Psychology
 Vol.5 No.5(2014), Article ID:45034,9 pages DOI:10.4236/psych.2014.55045

Stress and Marital Satisfaction of Parents with Children with Disabilities in Hong Kong

Yuen Wing Ki1, Chan Chung Yan Joanne1,2

1Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

2The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Email: chanchungyan@cuhk.edu.hk

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 28 October 2013; revised 29 November 2013; accepted 25 December 2013

ABSTRACT

This study examined the associations among sources of parenting stress, sharing of child care responsibilities, and marital satisfaction of parents with children with disabilities in Hong Kong. This is a cross-sectional quantitative study. Seventy-two parents completed a survey about their sources of parenting stress, sharing of child care responsibilities and marital satisfaction. Results indicated that handling their children’s emotions and behaviours was the most stressful experience. Linear regression analysis showed that the amount of sharing of child care responsibilities and the stress of time allocation were significant predictors for marital satisfaction. Implications for providing support to parents with children with disabilities in Hong Kong were discussed.

Keywords

Children with Disabilities, Marital Satisfaction, Parenting, Stress

1. Introduction

Parenting children with disabilities may influence the parents positively or negatively (Hock, Timm, & Ramisch, 2012). While it is helpful for social workers to be aware of the positive impacts, the negative impacts on the parent, the marital relationship and the family are often the focus of attention for designing and implementing prevention and intervention services for families with children with disabilities.

Research has indicated that parents with children with disabilities experience intensified parenting stress, poorer mental health, disruption to career, decrease in leisure time and are more likely to divorce than parents with normal children (Brobst, Clopton, & Hendrick, 2009; McConkey, Truesdale-Kennedy, Chang, Jarrah, & Shukri, 2008; Risdal & Singer, 2004; Rogers & Hogan, 2003). Moreover, the subsequent childbearing decisions, caring labor, living arrangements, allocation of time for caring of other children may be affected and lead to poor family functioning (Cohen & Petrescu-Prahova, 2006; MacInnes, 2008; McConkey et al., 2008; Rogers & Hogan, 2003).

Although substantial research has been done on parents with children with disabilities, most research has been conducted in Western cultures with very few exceptions (e.g. McConkey et al., 2008) and overlooked potential cultural differences. According to Markus and Kitayama (1991), Western cultures and many Asian cultures differ in their construals of the self, others, and the interdependence between self and others. These differences in turn have implications for cognition, emotion and motivation (Markus & Kitayama, 1991). For example, Chinese culture values group harmony whereas American culture typically emphasizes independence (Higgins, Zheng, Liu, & Chun, 2002). These fundamental cultural differences are likely to influence the experience of parenting children with disabilities, the susceptibility to different sources of parenting stress, the perception of sharing of child care responsibilities and the evaluation of marital satisfaction. Hence, the objective of this study was to explore the associations among different sources of parenting stress, marital satisfaction, and sharing of child care responsibilities of parents with children with disabilities in a Chinese culture, namely, Hong Kong.

2. Literature Review

2.1. The Chinese Experience of Stress

According to Phillips and Pearson (1996), Chinese people experience stress differently compared to individuals in Western cultures. Chinese people tend to keep stressful events to themselves and Chinese parents are not encouraged to express their emotions (Bond, 1993; Kim & Wong, 2002; Lai & Salili, 1997). Rogers and Hogan (2003) suggested that the stress of one family member asserts a reciprocal effect on other family members, and parenting stress is associated with children’s negative outcomes such as behavioural problems and affects parent-child interaction negatively (Åsberg, Vogel, & Bowers, 2008). Therefore, it is important to understand the sources of stress of parents with children with disabilities for tailoring interventions for the children and responding to the needs of the parents (Smith, Oliver, & Innocenti, 2001).

2.2. Marital Satisfaction, Parenting, and Children with Disabilities in Chinese Culture

Research on marital satisfaction in Chinese couples has been rare as Chinese culture considers marital satisfaction “a private matter between a husband and wife rather than an issue that can be comfortably subject to open discussions” (Guo & Huang, 2005: p. 22). Research has found cultural differences in the differentiation of good and bad marriages (Pimentel, 2000). With regard to marital satisfaction, Wong and Goodwin (2009) found that British participants valued companionship more but Hong Kong participants placed more emphasis on harmonious marital relationship. For Chinese couples, divorce was less frequently considered a resolution to marriage compared to Westerners (Pimentel, 2000). Consequently, Chinese couples may endeavor to avoid the development of disharmony as divorce is not a culturally appropriate exit for marriage (Pimentel, 2000).

Traditionally, in Chinese culture, “the ultimate purpose of a marriage is to produce an heir to carry on the family line” (Lu, 2006: p. 475). Therefore, in the Chinese cultural context, children are expected to be an essential element of a family whereas many Westerners may be more ambivalent about childbearing (Pimentel, 2000). Consequently, the birth and subsequent care of a child with disabilities may have a particularly strong impact on Chinese couples who view children as the purpose of marriage (Lu, 2006). Moreover, given the traditional Chinese belief that the disabilities of a child are the consequences of something that the mother or her family has done (Holroyd, 2003), such cultural uniqueness in the conceptualization of marital satisfaction, parenting and attribution of children with disabilities warrants the examination of the associations among the sources of stress and marital satisfaction of parents with children with disabilities in Chinese culture.

2.3. Chinese Concept of Sharing of Responsibilities between Spouses

There has been research on the division of labor between parents of children with disabilities (Cohen & PetrescuPrahova, 2006). For instance, Simmerman, Blacher, and Baker (2001), in a longitudinal study, found that the mother’s satisfaction with the father’s involvement in helping their children with disabilities was associated with both parents’ marital adjustment. According to McConnell, Futris, and Bartholomae (2009), if mothers of children with physical disabilities were satisfied with the father’s parenting, they would perceive the behavioural problems of the children as less influential. Zuo and Bian (2001) found that although housework was unevenly distributed between Chinese couples, most of the husbands and wives thought it was fair. There was also a trend that the wife contributed three times more to child care compared to the husband (Zuo & Bian, 2001). Nevertheless, little is known about Chinese couples’ division of labor in caring for children with disabilities. In the current study, the sharing of child care responsibilities and its associations with sources of parenting stress and marital satisfaction were examined.

2.4. Significance of the Study

Very few studies (e.g. Keller & Honig, 2004) investigated the sources of stress and their associations with marital satisfaction of parents with children with disabilities. Though there were studies in Hong Kong that examined the stress faced by families with children with disabilities (e.g. Ma, Lai, & Pun, 2002), none has looked at the associations among sources of parenting stress, marital satisfaction and sharing of child care responsibilities. Shek (2006) highlighted the importance of research on Chinese families based on the huge size of the Chinese population and the strong emphasis of family in Chinese culture. This study will provide theoretical implications for furthering the understanding of how different sources of stress affect marital satisfaction of parents with children with disabilities. In addition, since supportive services for families with children with disabilities are crucial for adaptation (Tétreault et al., 2012), the findings of this study can inform social workers and other professionals such as family therapists and nurses about how to provide specialized assistance and counseling to parents with children with disabilities in Chinese culture.

2.5. The Context of Hong Kong

The current study focused on parents with children with disabilities in Hong Kong. The Government of Hong Kong provides various types of special services for disabled pre-school children, including Early Education and Training Centre (EETC), Integrated Programme in Kindergarten-Cum-Child Care Centre, Special Child Care Centre, Residential Special Child Care Centre and Small Group Home for Mildly Mentally Handicapped Children. In 2010 and 2011, approximately 5982 disabled children received early intervention (Social Welfare Department, HKSAR, 2011). EETC accommodates the largest number of disabled pre-school children and referrals are made either by social workers or government-run children assessment centres. Participation is voluntary. In 2010 and 2011, there were 37 centres in Hong Kong with a total of approximately 2341 cases (Social Welfare Department, HKSAR, 2012). Participants for this study were parents from two EETC in Hong Kong.

2.6. Hypothesis

In this study, the main hypothesis was that marital satisfaction would be negatively correlated with parenting stress in parents with children with disabilities in Hong Kong. In addition, the associations between sharing of child care responsibilities and marital satisfaction were explored.

3. Methods

3.1. Participants

The final sample consisted of 72 participants (either the father or mother of a family). There were 55 female participants and 17 male participants. The mean age of participants was 35.11 years (SD = 5.64 years). All of the participants were married and the mean duration of marriage was 8.77 years (SD = 4.65 years) (range: 2.17 years to 24.08 years). Of the participants, 40% were employed, 58% were unemployed and 1% did not report the employment status. For the spouses of the participants, 82% were employed and 18% were unemployed. In this sample, 33% of both the participants and their spouse were unemployed. The family income per month of 74% of participants was over HKD 10000 (~USD 1289); 13% were between HKD 7001 to HKD 10,000 (~USD 902 - 1289); 7% were between HKD 4001 to HKD 7000 (~USD 516 - 902); 3% were between HKD 1001 to HKD 4000 (~USD 129 - 515) and 3% had less than HKD 1000 (~USD 129), 1% did not report the monthly family income. The average number of members per household including the participant was 3.65 (SD = .68).

3.2. Procedures

Parents with children with disabilities including developmental delay, physical and mental handicap, and psychological problems, and had been admitted to two branches of Early Education and Training Centre in Hong Kong were recruited for this study. A total of 80 questionnaires with consent forms were distributed to the parents either in person or via mail. Eight questionnaires were discarded either because they were missing important data or the participants were not married. The participants did not receive any monetary compensation for their participation. The participants either returned the questionnaires in person or via mail. The questionnaires were anonymous.

3.3. Measures

Demographics. Participants provided information about their gender, age, marital status, duration of marriage, their employment status and that of their spouse, monthly family income and the total number of family members in the household.

Marital satisfaction. A single-item measure was used for measuring marital satisfaction (Fowers, 1991). Participants responded to the question “What is your level of satisfaction with your marriage?” on a 10-point scale (1 = extremely dissatisfied to 10 = extremely satisfied).

Stress level. Similar to previous research (Baxter, Cummins, & Yiolitis, 2000), we developed items to measure the different sources of stress of parents. Participants evaluated their stress level with regard to seven sources of stress on 7-point scales (1 = do not feel any pressure to 7 = feel a lot of pressure). The seven sources of stress were as follows: 1) accompanying child to training in the centre (the Early Education and Training Centre), 2) domestic training with child, 3) allocating time between child care and work or housework, 4) guiding child to learn, 5) handling the emotions and behaviours of child, 6) the differences between the development of their child and that of other children of the same age, and 7) other people’s view of their child care. The Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.90, indicating high internal reliability.

Sharing of child care responsibilities. Participants assessed their spouse’s level of sharing of child care responsibilities using a single item similar to previous research (Goff, Mount, & Jamison, 1990) on a 7-point scale (1 = does not share responsibility to 7 = sharing much responsibility).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Version 21 was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics, correlational analyses and linear regression analysis will be reported.

4. Results

4.1. Descriptive Statistics

Marital Satisfaction and Sharing of Child Care Responsibilities On a scale from 1 - 10, the level of marital satisfaction was considered as relatively high (M = 7.96, SD = 1.62) and on a scale from 1 - 7, the level of sharing of child care responsibilities was above mid-point (M = 4.46, SD = 1.77).

Sources of Stress Among the sources of stress, handling the emotions and behaviours of child induced the highest level of stress, followed by guiding child to learn and stress brought by the differences between the development of child and other children of the same age. Parents had moderate level of stress from domestic training and other people’s views of their child care. Parents had the least stress from accompanying child to attend training in centres. The means and standard deviations of the stressors are listed in Table 1.

4.2. Correlations of Demographics, Sources of Parenting Stress, Sharing of Child Care Responsibilities and Marital Satisfaction

Demographics including age, duration of marriage, employment status of the participants and their spouses, number of members in the household, and level of family income per month were not significantly correlated with marital satisfaction. Sharing of child care responsibilities was positively correlated with marital satisfaction. Among the sources of stress, only one source which was “accompanying child to training held in the center” was not significantly correlated with marital satisfaction. All the other sources were negatively correlated with marital satisfaction (see Table 2).

Table 1. Sources of stress of parents with children with disabilities: descriptive statistics.                              

Table 2. Correlations of demographics, sources of parenting stress, sharing of child care responsibilities and marital satisfaction.                                                                                           

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

4.3. Linear Regression Analysis

Variables that had significant correlations with marital satisfaction were then entered as predictors in a linear regression with marital satisfaction as the dependent variable. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the effects of six sources of stress and sharing of child care responsibilities on marital satisfaction. The results showed that the model explained 27% of the variance in marital satisfaction (R2 = .34, F(7.64) = 4.79, p < .001). Only sharing of child care responsibilities (β = 0.24, p < .05) and the source of stress “allocating time between child care and work or housework” (β = −.36, p < .01) were significant predictors in the model. Please refer to

Table 3.

5. Discussion

5.1. Sources of Parenting Stress

Among the seven sources of parenting stress, handling the emotions and behaviours of children with disabilities was the most stressful for parents. This is consistent with previous findings in Western culture which showed that the behavioural and emotional problems of children with disabilities had impacted their parents’ level of stress (Baker, Blacher, Crnic, & Edelbrock, 2002; Baker et al., 2003; Hastings, 2002; Herring et al., 2006). According to Howe (2006), children with disabilities may have difficulty in expressing their mental states, therefore, social workers and other professionals may endeavor to tailor training programs to enhance the communication between parents and children which may help reduce parents’ stress in managing the behaviours and emotions of the children.

In contrast, accompanying their child to training in the Early Education and Training Centre was the least stress-inducing for parents. It could be due to the effectiveness of the training programs or opportunities to interact with other parents. According to Resch, Benz, and Elliott (2012), compared to demographics of parent and child as well as the severity of the child’s disability, the availability of social support and resources had a larger direct effect on the well-being of the parents. Previous research has also shown that parents with children with Table 3. Summary of linear regression analysis for variables predicting marital satisfaction of parents with children with disabilities.                                                                                            

*p < .05; **p < .01.

disabilities benefited from receiving emotional, social as well as practical support from other parents with children with disabilities (Kerr & McIntosh, 2000). These centres might have served as a platform for parents to provide mutual support to each other, hence alleviating their level of stress of accompanying their child to training. According to Glidden, Billings, and Jobe (2006), finding resources and accessing care services are challenges for parents with children with disabilities. Therefore, the government and non-government organizations need to collaborate to maximize the capacities of training and child care centres for children with disabilities to assist the parents.

Among the sources of stress, only the source “allocating time between child care and work or housework” was a significant predictor of marital satisfaction. The more stress parents had with time allocation, the less satisfied they were with their marriage. Therefore, professionals who work with these parents can equip them with time management skills.

5.2. Stress Level and Marital Satisfaction

The stress level of the majority of stressors of parents in this study was moderate and marital satisfaction was high. Parents in this study might be similar to parents with children with autism in Western culture who demonstrated resilience and were highly adaptive (Twoy, Connolly, & Novak, 2007), and thus did not experience a high level of stress in most of the stressors. According to Eddy and Walker (1999), having a child with disabilities may not necessarily result in marital distress. The current study supports such claim. An alternative explanation is that the norms of harmony in Chinese culture might have led parents to report their marital satisfaction in a positive light (Stander, Hsiung, & MacDermid, 2001).

5.3. Sharing of Child Care Responsibilities

Sharing of child care responsibilities was a significant predictor of marital satisfaction. The more the spouse shared responsibilities of child care, the higher the marital satisfaction. In a collectivistic culture like Chinese culture which emphasizes social harmony and group needs, spouses may have more motivation to prioritize harmony of marriage as a subset of social harmony. For Chinese parents with children with disabilities, one of the means to achieve the goal of social harmony may be to share the responsibilities of child care. The results of the current study indicated that sharing of child care responsibilities should be encouraged to increase marital satisfaction. Social workers and other professionals can aim at equipping both parents with the skills of child care to increase the effectiveness of the division of labour.

5.4. Limitations and Future Research Directions

This study had several limitations. The participants were parents of children who attended two EETC. As these centres provide support for families with children with disabilities, this study was limited in its generalizability and might not represent parents who were not receiving support from these centres. As most of the participants were clients of one of the researchers, there might be the issue of social desirability. Parents might have underrated their stress level, or overrated their marital satisfaction. Future research can recruit parents from multiple sites for a more representative sample to increase the generalizability of the results. Only quantitative data was collected in this study, future studies may use interviews to understand the reasons behind the different sources of stress and other factors that contribute to marital satisfaction of parents with children with disabilities in a Chinese cultural context. In particular, females were over-represented in the participants. Given that previous research has found gender differences in marital satisfaction of parents with children with disabilities (Berge, Patterson, & Rueter, 2006), future research can aim at including both spouses to explore potential discrepancies in the experience of stress and marital satisfaction within a family. Future research can also compare maternal and paternal stress in parents with children with disabilities in Chinese culture. The current study did not differrentiate among the different types of disabilities that children had. Future research can examine the potential differences in stress and marital satisfaction of parents with children with different disabilities, different severities of disability, and at different stages in the developmental trajectory. Such knowledge would be essential for professionals when they provide services and counseling for families with children with special needs.

6. Conclusion

This is the first study to examine the associations among sources of parenting stress, sharing of child care responsibilities and marital satisfaction in parents with children with disabilities in a Chinese cultural context. The findings suggest that emphasis should be placed on helping these parents to handle the emotional and behavioural problems of their children to alleviate the stress of the parents. For enhancing marital satisfaction, alleviating the stress of time allocation and increasing the sharing of child care responsibilities will be beneficial. Social workers and other professionals working with parents with children with disabilities should pay more attention to educating parents about time management, sharing of child care responsibilities and how to handle the emotional and behavioural problems of the children.

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on Yuen Wing Ki’s thesis completed at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Part of this paper had been presented at the 10th International Family Nursing Conference in Kyoto, Japan in June, 2011. We would like to thank Doris Leung for her advice. We would like to thank Wong Kit Yi, Miranda, Pang Cho Kwan, Chan Mei Mei, Olive, Lau Wai Ming, and Lai Hoi Lam for their help in the preparation of the manuscript. The project and the preparation of the manuscript were supported by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

References

  1. Åsberg, K. K., Vogel, J. J., & Bowers, C. A. (2008). Exploring Correlates and Predictors of Stress in Parents of Children Who Are Deaf: Implications of Perceived Social Support and Mode of Communication. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17, 486-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-007-9169-7
  2. Baker, B. L., Blacher, J., Crnic, K. A., & Edelbrock, C. (2002). Behavior Problems and Parenting Stress in Families of Three-Year-Old Children with and without Developmental Delays. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 433- 444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2002)107<0433:BPAPSI>2.0.CO;2
  3. Baker, B. L., Mclntyre, L. L., Blacher, J., Crnic, K., Edelbrock, C., & Low, C. (2003). Pre-School Children with and without Developmental Delay: Behaviour Problems and Parenting Stress over Time. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00484.x
  4. Baxter, C., Cummins, R. A., & Yiolitis, L. (2000). Parental Stress Attributed to Family Members with and without Disability: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 25, 105-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13269780050033526
  5. Berge, J. M., Patterson, J. M., & Rueter, M. (2006). Marital Satisfaction and Mental Health of Couples with Children with Chronic Health Conditions. Families, Systems, & Health, 24, 267-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1091-7527.24.3.267
  6. Bond, M. H. (1993). Emotion and Their Expression in Chinese Culture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 245-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00987240
  7. Brobst, J. B., Clopton, J. R., & Hendrick, S. S. (2009). Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: The Couple’s Relationship. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 38-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088357608323699
  8. Cohen, P. N., & Petrescu-Prahova, M. (2006). Gendered Living Arrangements among Children with Disabilities. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 630-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00279.x
  9. Eddy, L. L., & Walker, A. J. (1999). The Impact of Children with Chronic Health Problems on Marriage. Journal of Family Nursing, 5, 10-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107484079900500102
  10. Fowers, B. J. (1991). His and Her Marriage: A Multivariate Study of Gender and Marital Satisfaction. Sex Roles, 24, 209-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288892
  11. Glidden, L. M., Billings, F. J., & Jobe, B. M. (2006). Personality, Coping Style and Well-Being of Parents Rearing Children with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 949-962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00929.x
  12. Goff, S. J., Mount, M. K., & Jamison, R. L. (1990). Employer Supported Child Care, Work/Family Conflict, and Absenteeism: A Field Study. Personnel Psychology, 43, 793-809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb00683.x
  13. Guo, B., & Huang, J. (2005). Marital and Sexual Satisfaction in Chinese Families: Exploring the Moderating Effects. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 21-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00926230590475224
  14. Hastings, R. P. (2002). Parental Stress and Behaviour Problems of Children with Developmental Disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 27, 149-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1366825021000008657
  15. Herring, S., Gray, K., Taffe, J., Tonge, B., Sweeney, D., & Einfeld, S. (2006). Behaviour and Emotional Problems in Toddlers with Pervasive Developmental Disorders and Developmental Delay: Associations with Parental Mental Health and Family Functioning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 874-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00904.x
  16. Higgins, L. T., Zheng, M., Liu, Y., & Chun, H. S. (2002). Attitudes to Marriage and Sexual Behaviors: A Survey of Gender and Culture Differences in China and United Kingdom. Sex Roles, 46, 75-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016565426011
  17. Hock, R. M., Timm, T. M., & Ramisch, J. L. (2012). Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Crucible for Couple Relationships. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 406-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00794.x
  18. Holroyd, E. E. (2003). Chinese Culture Influences on Parental Caregiving Obligations toward Children with Disabilities. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 4-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732302239408
  19. Howe, D. (2006). Disabled Children, Parent-Child Interaction and Attachment. Child and Family Social Work, 11, 95-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00397.x
  20. Keller, D., & Honig, A. S. (2004). Maternal and Paternal Stress in Families with School-Aged Children with Disabilities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74, 337-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.74.3.337
  21. Kerr, S. M., & McIntosh, J. B. (2000). Coping When a Child Has a Disability: Exploring the Impact of Parent-to-Parent Support. Child: Care, Health and Development, 26, 309-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00149.x
  22. Kim, S. Y., & Wong, V. Y. (2002). Assessing Asian and Asian American Parenting: A Review of the Literature. In K. S. Kurasaki, S. Okazaki, & S. Sue (Eds.), Asian American Mental Health: Assessment Theories and Methods (pp. 185-201). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0735-2_13
  23. Lai, A. C., & Salili, F. (1997). Parental Stress, Coping Styles, and Social Supports in Chinese Families with Hepatitis-BCarrying Children. Current Psychology, 16, 65-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1016-x
  24. Lu, L. (2006). The Transition to Parenthood: Stress, Resources, and Gender Differences in a Chinese Society. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 471-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20110
  25. Ma, J. L. C., Lai, K., & Pun, S. H. (2002). Parenting Distress and Parental Investment of Hong Kong Chinese Parents with a Child Having an Emotional or Behavioural Problem: A Qualitative Study. Child and Family Social Work, 7, 99-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00232.x
  26. MacInnes, M. D. (2008). One’s Enough for Now: Children, Disability, and the Subsequent Childbearing of Mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 758-771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00519.x
  27. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  28. McConkey, R., Truesdale-Kennedy, M., Chang, M. Y., Jarrah, S., & Shukri, R. (2008). The Impact on Mothers of Bringing up a Child with Intellectual Disabilities: A Cross-Cultural Study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 65-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.007
  29. McConnell, A. D., Futris, T. G., & Bartholomae, S. (2009). Mothers of Children with Physical Disabilities: Influence of Family Processes on Mothers’ Depressive Symptomatology. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 68-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01494920802537522
  30. Phillips, M. R., & Pearson, V. (1996). Coping in Chinese Communities: The Need for a New Research Agenda. In M. H. Bonds (Ed.), The Handbook of Chinese Psychology (pp. 429-440). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
  31. Pimentel, E. E. (2000). Just How Do I Love Thee? Marital Relations in Urban China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 32-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00032.x
  32. Resch, J. A., Benz, M. R., & Elliott, T. R. (2012). Evaluating a Dynamic Process Model of Wellbeing for Parents of Children with Disabilities: A Multi-Method Analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57, 61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027155
  33. Risdal, D., & Singer, G. H. S. (2004). Marital Adjustment in Parents of Children with Disabilities: A Historical Review and Meta-Analysis. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 95-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.29.2.95
  34. Rogers, M. L., & Hogan, D. P. (2003). Family Life with Children with Disabilities: The Key Role of Rehabilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 818-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00818.x
  35. Shek, D. T. L. (2006). Chinese Family Research: Puzzles, Progress, Paradigms, and Policy Implications. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 275-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05283508
  36. Simmerman, S., Blacher, J., & Baker, B. L. (2001). Fathers’ and Mothers’ Perceptions of Father Involvement in Families with Young Children with Disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 26, 325-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668250120087335
  37. Smith, T. B., Oliver, M. N. I., & Innocenti, M. S. (2001). Parenting Stress in Families of Children with Disabilities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71, 257-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.71.2.257
  38. Social Welfare Department, HKSAR (2011). Social Welfare Services in Figures 2011. http://www.swd.gov.hk/doc/res_stat/swdfig2011.pdf
  39. Social Welfare Department, HKSAR (2012). Early Education and Training Centre. http://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_rehab/sub_listofserv/id_earlyeduca/
  40. Stander, V. A., Hsiung, P. C., & MacDermid, S. (2001). The Relationship of Attributions to Marital Distress: A Comparison of Mainland Chinese and U.S. Couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 124-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.1.124
  41. Tétreault, S., Blais-Michaud, S., Deschênes, P. M., Beaupré, P., Gascon, H., Boucher, N., & Carrière, M. (2012). How to Support Families of Children with Disabilities? An Exploratory Study of Social Support Services. Children & Family Social Work, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00898.x
  42. Twoy, R., Connolly, P. M., & Novak, J. M. (2007). Coping Strategies Used by Parents of Children with Autism. Journal of American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 19, 251-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00222.x
  43. Wong, S., & Goodwin, R. (2009). Experiencing Marital Satisfaction across Three Cultures: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1011-1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347938
  44. Zuo, J. P., & Bian, Y. (2001). Gendered Resources, Division of Housework, and Perceived Fairness—A Case in Urban China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1122-1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01122.x

Journal Menu >>