American Journal of Plant Sciences
Vol.3 No.3(2012), Article ID:17913,7 pages DOI:10.4236/ajps.2012.33039

Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Morpho-Agronomic Characteristics of Soybeans (Glycine max L.)

Justin Mudibu1,2, Kabwe K. C. Nkongolo3*, Adrien Kalonji-Mbuyi1,2, Roger V. Kizungu1,4

1Faculty of Agronomy, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DR-Congo; 2Regional Nuclear Energy Center, Kinshasa, DR-Congo; 3Department of Biological Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada; 4National Institute for Research and Agronomic Studies (INERA), Kinshasa, DR-Congo.

Email: *knkongolo@ laurentian.ca

Received December 9th, 2011; revised December 28th, 2011; accepted January 14th, 2012

Keywords: Gamma irradiation; Glycine max; DR-Congo; Genetic variation; Crop yield

ABSTRACT

Mutation breeding in crop plants is an effective approach in improvement of crop having narrow genetic base such as soybean. The main objective of the present study is to determine the effect of different doses of gamma irradiation on different morpho-agronomic characteristics. Agronomic traits that were analyzed included; grain yield, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/plant and weight of 100 seeds and numbers of days to 50% flowering. Morphometric characterization of the descriptive data included plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves/plant, leaflet length, leaflet width, number of ramifications/plant, and pod length and width at 3 lodge stage. The results of the present study revealed that the two gamma irradiation doses used (0.2 kGy and 0.4 kGy) decreased significantly most of agronomic and morphological traits evaluated in M1 populations. Different effects of 0.2 kGy and 0.4 kGy irradiation were observed in M2 populations with significant increase of grain yields and yield components in all the three soybean varieties. In general, a significant decrease or no changes of morphological traits were observed for the two irradiation doses in M2 populations. The levels of changes varied among varieties. Potential high yielding mutants were identified in progenies of irradiated seeds.

1. Introduction

The soybean (Glycine max L.) is native to East Asia and it is currently widely grown in many countries worldwide. The US, Brazil, Argentina, China and India are the world’s largest soybean producers and represent more than 90% of global soybean production. The majority of African countries growing soybeans use tropical soybean varieties developed by the International Institute of tropical Agriculture (ITTA) [1-3].

Despite the richness of the soybean germplasm collections, the genetic base of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars developed in many breeding programs is very narrow. Several studies have shown that only a few accessions have contributed to the majority of the genes in current cultivars [4-10]. This may threaten the ability of breeders to sustain improvement for high yield, resistance to pests and abiotic stresses. Mutation breeding in crop plants is an effective approach in improvement of crops having narrow genetic base as such soybean. It is an important supplementary approach to crop improvement. Many mutant lines have been identified in soybean mutation breeding programs based on morphological characteristics [11-14].

Genetic variability can also be increased by inducing mutations with ionized radiations [3,15,16]. Genetic diversity of mutant lines can be monitored using morphological, agronomic and molecular characterizations. In addition, the effectiveness of gamma radiation in improving plant growth, seed quality, cooking time and physiological processes is highly related to the level of doses used [3,17,18]. For example, Hezazi and Hamideldin [17] showed that gamma irradiation at 0.4 kGy gave the highest effect in improving okra plant growth and seed yield compared to 0.3 kGy and 0.5 kGy. Lima et al. [18] demonstrated that gamma irradiation at doses varying from 1 kGy to 10 kGy were efficient for the destruction of the fungal genera found in cowpeas bean grains. The application of gamma irradiation in developing high grain yield soybean varieties is limited.

The main objective of the present study is to determine the effect of different doses of gamma irradiation on different morpho-agronomic characteristics and to identify mutant lines with a potential of high grain yield.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Gamma Radiation

The study was carried out in the DR-Congo. Soybean seeds were provided by the Mvuazi and Gandajika research stations of the national institute for agronomic and research studies (INERA). To determine the effects of gamma radiations on morphometric and agronomic traits, 168 seeds from Kitoko, Vuangi, and TGX814-49D varieties were irradiated with different doses of gamma radiations with a cesium 137 source using “Lisa 1 conservatome” equipment at the Regional Nuclear Energy Center of Kinshasa (CRENK) in the DR-Congo. The treatments include 0 kGy, 0.2 kGy, 0.4 kGy, 0.6 kGy, and 0.8 kGy of gamma rays. Irradiated seeds were grown and M1 and M2 populations were produced for field trials.

2.2. Field Trials

Field experiments were conducted over 2 years (2008- 2010) at two sites in Eastern Kasai (Gandajika) in the DR. Congo. Site 1 was located at INERA agricultural research station (23˚57'E, 06˚48'S and 754 m altitude) and site 2 in Mpiana (23˚56'E, 06˚36'S and 685 m altitude). The region falls within the Aw4 climate type according to Köppen classification characterized with 4 months of dry season (from mid-May to August) coupled with 8 months of rainy season, sometimes interrupted by a short dry season in January/February. Daily temperature averages 25˚C and annual rainfall is close to 1500 mm. Typically, Gandajika soils consist of a collection of sandy on clay sediment more often based on a shallow lateritic old slab.

At each site, gross plot size was 11 m long and 2 m wide for M1 populations and 6.4 m × 2 m for M2 populations. The sub-plots were 2 m × 1.8 m for both trials. Two seeds were were sown at every 10 cm to a depth of about 2 cm. Manual weeding was carried out as to keep the field clean.

The experiment was a split plot design with five replicates. The varieties represented the main plot and the irradiation dose treatments were the sub-plots. The trials were conducted with no fertilizer or pesticide applications.

In total 13 characters were selected for germplasm characterization. The descriptive data included plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves/plant, leaflet length, leaflet width, number of ramifications/plant, pod length and width at 3 lodge stage. Plant height was measured as the length of the main stem from the soil surface to the terminal node at maturity. Agronomic data include grain yield/ha, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/plant, weight of 100 seeds, numbers of days to 50% flowering.

Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GenStat Discovery Edition 3 and R software. Main effects were separated by least significant differences (LSD) at P = 0.05 level.

3. Results

Mutation breeding in crop plants is an effective tool in hands of plant breeders especially in crops having narrow genetic base such as soybean. In the present study, four main components of yields were analyzed in details. They include, number of pods per plant, number of seed per plant, grain yield per hectare, and weight of 100 seeds. Tables 1 and 2 describe data for the M1 generation and tables 3 and 4 for M2 progenies. Grain yield varied from 370.7 kGy (for TGX 814-49D at 0.4 kGy) to 2156.4 Kg/ha (for KITOKO at 0 kGy) in M1 and from 1513.3 kGy) (for VUANGI at 0 KGy) to 2542.7 Kg/ha (for KITOKO at 0 kGy) in M2. In M1, gamma irradiation at any dose decreased significantly grain yield compared to control for the three varieties evaluated.

There was a high level of variability in the M2 generation for all characters evaluated. In general gamma irradiation increased significantly grain yield, number of pods/plant and number of seeds /plant. The highest changes for agronomic grain yield, number of pods and seeds per plants were observed in variety Vuangi. In fact the gamma irradiation at 0.2 kGy increased significantly grain yield by 17% for Vuangi and 11% for TGX-814- 49D. An unexpected decrease of 32% was observed for Kitoko at the 0.2 kGy dose. The number of pods per plant was increased by 14% for Kitoko, 48% for Vuangi, and 7% for TGX814-49D. For the number of seeds per plant, there was a significant increase of 7% for Kitoko, 77% for Vuangi, and 7% for TGX 814-49D at 0.2 kGy dose. A similar trend was observed for the 0.4 kGy dose. For this treatment, there was a 13% grain yield increase for Vuangi and 15% for Kitoko. For the number of pods per plant, there was a 37% increase for Vuangi, 5% for Kitoko, and 13% for TGX814-49D. The number of seeds per plant was increased by 70% for Vuangi, 15% for Kitoko, and 6% for TGX814-49D. Several mutants showing significant increase of number of pods and seeds per plant were observed. The highest increase in pod production was observed in TGX814-49D variety where an individual plant from seeds subjected to 0.2 kGy irradiation produced 464 pods at M2 generation compared to the mean of 67 pods per plant produced in control treatment (0 kGy).

The effect of gamma irradiation on plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves/plant, leaflet length, leaflet width, number of ramifications/plant and pod length and width at 3 lodge stage varied between treatments and varieties. Using the non-irradiated seeds as control or

Table 1. Grain yield, number of pods and seeds per plant, weight of 100 seeds and days to 50% flowering in M-1 generation of three soybean accessions subjected to different doses of gamma irradiation.

Table 2. Plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves per plant, leaflet width, number of ramification per plant, pod length and width in M-1 generation of three soybean accessions irradiated with different doses of gamma radiations.

reference, the effects of different doses were determined. In general 0.2 kGy and 0.4 kGy treatments resulted in reduction or no significant effect for the targeted descriptive traits. In the M1 generation, there was a 25% reduction of height for Kitoko, 13% for Vuangi, and TGX814- 49D irradiated at 0.2 kGy dose. The levels of reduction were 18%, 23%, and 19% for stem diameter for Kitoko, Vuangi, and TGX814-49D, respectively. A similar level

Table 3. Grain yield, number of pods and seeds per plant, weight of 100 seeds and days to 50% flowering in M-2 generation of three soybean accessions subjected to different doses of gamma irradiation.

Table 4. Plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves per plant, leaflet width, number of ramification per plant, pod length and width in M-2 generation of three soybean accessions irradiated with different doses of gamma radiations.

of reduction was observed for the 0.4 kGy treatment with 25%, 13% and 38% decrease of plant height for Kitoko, Vuangi, and TGX814-49D, respectively. Reduction of stem diameter was 6.5%, for Kitoko, and 18.5% for Vuangi and TGX814-49D. Significant decrease of the number of leaves per plant, leaflet width, and number of ramifications per plant was observed only for the 0.4 kGy treatment. For this treatment, 12% and 13% decrease of the number of leaves per plant were observed for Vuangi and TGX814-49D, respectively. Leaflet width change was observed at 0.4 kGy treatment for Vuangi (−20%) and TGX814-49D (−15%). The highest change for the M1 generation was noted in the number of ramifications per plant with a 38% and 46% reductions in Vuangi and TGX814-49D, respectively.

The results from the 0.2 kGy treatment showed no significant differences in plant height and other morphological traits in the M2 generation for the three varieties with the exception of a 13% reduction of plant height for Kitoko and 30% decrease for the number of leaves per plant in TGX814-49D. The 0.4 kGy irradiation induced a significant reduction of plant height in Kitoko (14%), a decrease of the number of leaves per plant (37%) in TGX 814-49D, and a reduction of leaflet width (19%). Surprisingly an increase of 18% and 15% of the stem diameter was observed for stem diameter for the 0.2 kGy and 0.4 kGy treatments, respectively for TGX814-49D. No significant difference was observed for days to 50% flowering among different treatments for both M1 and M2 generations.

4. Discussion

By comparison of the different treatments (different radiation doses) and the control (not irradiated), it was observed that there were significant alterations in the plant development and production in the M1 generation for all the gamma rays doses. Significant reduction of all the agro-morphometric characteristics was observed at that stage. Seeds treated at irradiation dose of 0.6 kGy and 0.8 kGy did not survive to produce progenies for evaluation. Higher exposures of gamma rays may cause injury to seeds. These data are consistent with other irradiation results reported by Yakoob and Ahamad [19] in mung beans, and Kon et al. [20] in long beans. Many studies showed that treatment with higher dose of gamma rays were inhibitory, whereas lower exposures were sometimes stimulatory. Gamma rays produce radicals that can damage and affect differentially plant morphology, anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology depending on the irradiation level.

On the other hand, the results of the M2 generation reported in the present study showed that it is possible to increase grain yields components to a maximum dose of 0.4 kGy. Improvement of agronomic characteristics by using gamma radiation has been reported in several studies. Khan et al. [21] reported a significant increase of chickpea grain yield using gamma irradiation at 0.6 kGy. Gustafson et al. [22] developed a high yielding and early maturing barley by mutation breeding methods. Rahimi and Bahrani [23] reported the highest grain yield increase in canola irradiated with 0.2 kGy of gamma rays. Similarly, they reported also a significant improvement of 1000 kernel weight and harvest index for 0.1 kGy gamma ray treatments.

In the present study, an increase of the number of pods per plant was observed in all the varieties for gamma irradiation at 0.2 and 0.4 kGy doses. Khan et al. [21] reported a decrease of pod number at 0.4 kGy treatment and an increase at 50 kGy without a change in the number of seed per pod. Similar results have been reported by Shakoor et al. [24,25] in mungbean, Khan et al. [21,26] in sorghum and chickpea, and Bhatnagar [14] in chickpea.

The results of the present study on plant height revealed non-significant changes between different irradiation treatments compared to the control in M2 generation. This data are consistent with report by Khan et al. [21], Rao [27] and Shakoor et al. [24,25] in mungbean, and Ramani and Jadon [16] in groundnut. The reports of Rao [27] in pigeon pea and Khan et al. [26] in sorghum did not agree with these results. They observed that plant height increased with the application of gamma irradiation. This may be due to the different genetic material and environmental conditions.

The dose of gamma rays radiation is important for inducing genetic variation that can lead to positive mutant. Previous studies in soybean has shown that gamma ray irradiation at a dose of 0.2 kGy gamma rays effectively lead to genetic diversity in plants Mudibu et al. [3] demonstrated using ISSR markers that the level of polymorphic loci observed within soybean varieties was significantly increased by more than 10 % when 0.2 kGy gamma-rays treatment was compared with the control. Hanafiah et al. [6] reported also that the highest genetic variation at M2 generation of soybean was on 0.2 kGy doses.

5. Conclusion

The results of the present study revealed that the two irradiation doses used decreased significantly most of agronomic and morphological traits evaluated in the M1 populations. Different effects of 0.2 kGy and 0.4 kGy irradiation were observed in the M2 populations with significant increase of grain yields and yield components in all the three soybean varieties. In general, a significant decrease or no changes of morphological traits were observed for the two irradiation doses in the M2 populations. The levels of changes varied among varieties. Potential high yielding mutants were identified in M2 populations.

6. Acknowledgements

This research was conducted through a partnership between Laurentian University (Ontario, Canada), University of Kinshasa (DR-Congo), and Caritas Congo. The authors are grateful to the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) for financial support through the University Partnerships in Cooperation and Development (UPCD) Tier 2 program.

REFERENCES

  1. I. J. Ogoke, R. J. Carsky, A. O. Togun and K. Dashiell, “Maturity Class and P Effects on Soya Bean Grain Yield in the Moist Savanna of West Africa,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sciences, Vol. 6, 2003, pp. 422-427. doi:10.1046/j.0931-2250.2003.00067.x
  2. A. Singh, R. J. Carsky, E. O. Lucas and K. E. Dashiell, “Soybean Maturity and Environmental Effects in Savanna Systems I. Dry Matter Accumulation,” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2002, pp. 75-93. doi:10.1300/J064v20n01_08
  3. J. Mudibu, K. K. Nkongolo, M. Mehes-Smith and A. Kalonji-Mbuyi, “Genetic Analysis of a Soybean Genetic Pool Using ISSR Marker: Effect of Gamma Radiation on Genetic Variability,” International Journal of Plant Breeding, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2011, pp. 235-245. doi:10.3923/ijpbg.2011.235.245
  4. D. M. Hiromoto and N. A. Velo, “The Genetic Base of Bra- zilian Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) Cultivars,” Brazilian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1986, pp. 295- 306.
  5. Z. Gizlice, T. E. Carter and J. W. Burton, “Genetic Base for North American Public Soybean Cultivars Released between 1947 and 1988,” Crop Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1994, pp. 1143-1151. doi:10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400050001x
  6. G. L. Brown-Guedira, J. A. Thompson, R. L. Nelson and M. L. Warburton, “Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Soybean Introductions and North American Ancestors Using RAPD and SSR Markers,” Crop Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2000, pp. 815-823. doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.403815x
  7. Z. Li and R. Nelson, “Genetic Diversity among Soybean Accessions from Three Countries Measured by RAPDs,” Crop Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2001, pp. 1337-1347. doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.4141337x
  8. R. H. G. Priolli, C. T. Mendes-Junior, N. E. Arantes and E. P. B. Contel, “Characterization of Brazilian Soybean Cultivars Using Microsatellite Markers,” Genetics and Molecular Biology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2002, pp. 185-193. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572002000200012
  9. A. L. V. Bonato, E. S. Calvo, I. O. Geraldi and C. A. A. Arias, “Genetic Similarity among Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Cultivars Released in Brazil Using AFLP Markers,” Genetic and Molecular Biology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2006, pp. 692-704. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572006000400019
  10. B. M. Mulato, M. I. Moller-Zucchi, V. Quecini and J. B. Pinheiro, “Genetic Diversity in Soybean Germplasm Identified by SSR and EST-SSR Markers,” Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2010, pp. 276-283.
  11. S. M. Rahman, V. Takag, K. Kubota, K. Miyamoto and V. Kawakita, “The High Oleic Acid Mutant in Soybean Induced by X-Rays Irradiation,” Bioscience, Biotechnology Biochemistry, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1070-1072. doi:10.1271/bbb.58.1070
  12. B. S. Ahloowalia and M. Maluszynski, “Induced Mutations—A New Paradigm in Plant Breeding,” Euphytica, Vol. 118, No. 2, 2001, pp. 167-173. doi:10.1023/A:1004162323428
  13. Y. Takagi and T. Anai, “Development of Novel Fatty Acid Composition in Soybean Oil by Induced Mutation,” Oleoscience, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2006, pp. 195-203.
  14. D. S. Hanafiah, Trikoesoemaningtyas, S. Yahya and D. Wirnas, “Induced mutations by gamma ray irradiation to Argomulyo soybean,” Biosciences, Vol. 2, No 3, 2010, pp. 121-125.
  15. S. M. Bhatnagar, “Induced Variability in Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Proceedings of International Symposium on the Contribution of Plant Mutation Breeding to Crop Improvement, Vol. 553, Vienna, Vol. 553, 18-22 June 1991, pp. 455-462.
  16. G. M. Ramani and B. S. Jadon, “Induced Variability in Groundnut in M2 Generation,” Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1991, pp. 23-26.
  17. A. Z. Hegazi and N. Hamideldin, “The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Enhancement of Growth of Okra [(Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] and Associated Molecular Changes,” Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2010, pp. 38-51.
  18. K. S. C. Lima, L. B. Souza and R. L. O. Godoy, “Effect of Gamma Irradiation and Cooking on Cowpea Bean Grains (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp),” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 80, No. 9, 2011, pp. 983-989. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.04.011
  19. M. Yaqoob and B. Ahmad, “Induced Mutation Studies in Some Mung Beans Cultivars,” Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 301-365.
  20. E. Kon, O.H. Ahmed, S. A. Saamin and N. M. Hussain, “Gamma Radiosensivity Study in Long Bean (Vigna sesquipedalis),” American Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 12, 2007, pp. 1090-1093. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2007.1090.1093
  21. M. R. Khan, A. S. Qureshi, S. A. Hussain and M. Ibrahim, “Genetic Variability Induced by Gamma Irradiation and Its Modulation with Gibberellic Acid in M2 Generation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Pakistan Journal of Botany, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2005, pp. 285-292.
  22. A. Gustafsson, A. Hagberg, G. Persson and K. Wikland, “Induced Mutation and Barley Improvement,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1971, pp. 239- 248. doi:10.1007/BF00277792
  23. M. M. Rahini and A. Bahrani “Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics of Canola (Brassica napus L.),” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2011, pp. 519-525.
  24. A. Shakoor, M. A. Haq and M. Sadiq, “Induced Genetic Variability in M2 and Evaluation of Promising Mutant Lines in M4 Generation of Mung Bean,” Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 1-2, 1978, pp. 1-6.
  25. A. Shakoor, M. A. Haq and M. Sadiq, “Induced Genetic Variability in Mung Bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek),” Environmental and Experimental Botany, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1978, pp. 169-175. doi:10.1016/0098-8472(78)90035-7
  26. A. Khan, K. Hayat, S. Hassan, M. Sadiq and M. Hashim, “Gamma Radiation Induced Variation in Some Genetic Parameters in Sorghum Cultivars in M2 Generation,” Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1989, pp. 199-203.
  27. S. K. Rao, “Gamma Ray Induced Morphological and Physiological Variations in Cicer arietinum L.,” Indian Journal of Botany, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1988, pp. 29-32.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.