Thermo-Mechanical Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr Alloy

Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry
Vol.08 No.01(2018), Article ID:81932,7 pages
10.4236/ampc.2018.81004

Thermo-Mechanical Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr Alloy

Xiaoping Luo1,2, Daqing Fang3, Baosheng Liu1,2

1College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China

2Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China

3College of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: November 29, 2017; Accepted: January 21, 2018; Published: January 24, 2018

ABSTRACT

The mechanical properties and microstructure of an as-cast Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr alloy were investigated during thermo mechanical treatments consisting of hot extrusion, rolling, and ageing at 200˚C. The results indicate that only Mg2Sn phases formed in the Mg matrix, Mn and Zr do not cause the formation of any new phases. The average grain size, tensile strength and elongation were 22 μm, 285 MPa, and 14.5%, respectively, after extrusion + rolling + ageing treatment (ERA). The mechanical properties of ERA alloys with a peak hardness of 81 HV and 6.7% are improved compared with those of EA (extrusion + ageing treatment) samples; these changes are attributed to grain refinement and solid solution strengthening, age hardening, and precipitation strengthening.

Keywords:

Mg-Sn-Mn-Zr Alloy, Thermomechanical Treatment, Microstructure,

Mechanical Properties

1. Introduction

Increasing demands to reduce the weight of automobiles and efforts to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases have accelerated the development of lightweight metallic materials. Many scientists have long believed in the promise of Mg alloys in automotive applications for weight reduction while maintaining their mechanical properties. However, the limited mechanical properties and unsatisfactory corrosion-resistance of most of the commonly used Mg alloys cannot match the requirements of many applications [1] [2] [3] .

The typical Mg-Al based and Mg-Zn based alloys are unsuitable for use at temperatures above 150˚C, due to their greatly decreased strength at elevated temperatures, and poor creep resistance [4] . Therefore, enhancing high temperature stability is a key issue for possible high temperature applications. Many approaches have been adopted to address these problems [5] [6] [7] . The most common method for improving high temperature performance is via alloying elements and forming thermally stable precipitates along the grain boundaries to restrict grain boundary sliding during deformation. Some Mg-Sn based alloys have great potential, among heat resistant Mg-alloys for applications using hot components. It has been reported that the Sn element could significantly improve the elevated temperature properties of Mg alloys via solid solution strengthening and age strengthening [8] [9] . Because of the low cost of the Sn element with a high solid solubility (14.48%) at 561˚C, there is the possibility of precipitating a cubic Mg2Sn phase in the Mg-rich matrix with decreasing temperature, whose formation during ageing is accompanied by strengthening [10] . Secondly, the Mg2Sn phase with a high melting point of 770˚C plays an important role in thermal-resistant properties, which is higher than that of other strengthening particles, such as Mg17Al12 phases. In addition, Mn is the only metallic element which not only generates a compound with Sn, but also precipitates in the magnesium matrix in its elemental substance form. And Mn could be significantly reinforced by the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys, which are attributed to the formation of Fe-Mn compounds to eliminate deleterious Fe during the melting alloy process. Also, the precipitation of a-Mn within a Mg matrix also can form Mn-containing inter-metallic compounds to improve creep-resistance [11] .

As we all know, a thermo mechanical grain-refinement technique could increase the available amount of a strengthening precipitate, and improve its properties simultaneously. In the present work, we prepared as-cast Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr alloys to perform comparative investigations among different thermo mechanical treatments, which could provide some valuable clues towards improving the mechanical properties of the alloy in the future.

2. Experimental

A Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr alloy was prepared using a magnesium-30 zirconium master alloy, pure Mg (99.95%) and Sn (99.9%) metals, and MnCl2 melted at 750˚C under protected gas including CO2 and SF6, and poured into a permanent mold with Ф125 mm × 280 mm dimensions. The thermo mechanical treatment is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. The as-cast Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr alloys with 90 mm in diameter were heat-treated (homogenized) at 480˚C for 10 h, and then extruded at 320˚C, with an extrusion ram speed of 0.1 mm/s and an extrusion ratio of 21:1, using graphite spray to reduce friction during extrusion. The extruded samples were age treated at 200˚C for 100 h (extrusion + ageing treatment: EA), respectively. As a comparison, before the ageing treatment extruded 8 mm-thick samples were hot-rolled at 320˚C along the extrusion

Figure 1. Thermomechanical processing route. Homo = homogenisation; Ext = extrusion; H.R. = hot rolling.

direction with a final thickness of 2.4 mm. The thickness reduction in the hot rolling was 20% per pass, and rolling speed was 0.5 m/s. After rolling pass, the sample was treated at 200˚C for 100 h (extruded + rolled + ageing treatment: ERA).

The microstructure was examined along the rolled direction (RD) and the extruded direction (ED) using optical microscopy (OM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S4800), equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS). The grain sizes were determined using the lineal intercept method; the average of the measured values was used as the grain size of the alloy. All the specimens were polished and etched with a solution of 10 ml of acetic acid, 5 g picric acid, and 10 ml of water. Thin foils for TEM were prepared after mechanical grinding to 0.1 mm, followed by twin-jet electrical polishing under cooling by liquid nitrogen. Standard tensile tests were performed at a strain rate of 1.0 × 10−3 s−1. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), and elongation to fracture were determined using three samples. The tensile fractured surfaces of the specimens were examined using SEM. The Vickers hardness (HV) was measured using a loading force of 100 g and a holding time of 20 s.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure Evolutions

Figure 2 shows the optical micrographs of the experimental as-cast alloys under different conditions. The microstructure of as-cast alloy with an average grain size (AGS) of 204 μm is shown in Figure 2(a). In order to eliminate the non-equilibrium phase, a solid solution treatment is employed; the AGS increases slightly to 210 μm and most of the secondary phase on the grain boundary is dissolved into the Mg matrix (Figure 2(b)). For the 320˚C extruded alloy, the AGS is greatly refined to about 120 μm during the extrusion process (Figure 2(c)), and the alloy consists of mostly equiaxial grains, which showed remarkable fluctuation. In addition, some fine second-phase particles are distributed in the grains. This result occurred because the forward extrusion temperature mainly affects the nucleation and growth of dynamic recrystallization. In contrast, there is big change in the size and shape of grains in the 320˚C extruded and 300˚C rolled alloy (Figure 2(d)). The average grain size is about 60 μm, the grains remain equiaxed, and their size distribution is similar to those in the as-extruded condition.

Figure 2. Microstructure of experimental alloy under different conditions. (a) As-cast; (b) Homo; (c) Extruded; (d) Extruded + rolled.

Compared with the above alloys, there are new many deformation twins appearing, acting as primary obstacles against dislocation motion. Because the grain boundary diffusion speed is fast in the hot-rolling process, dynamic recovery does not easily occur.

Figure 3 shows the peak ageing optical microscopy of the alloy at different thermo mechanical treatments. It can be seen that the grain size is more refined in the EA state (Figure 3(a)), and the values of AGS for the alloys are about 50 µm and composed of equiaxial grains. While the value of AGS is about 22 µm, it is mostly compression twinning and regular polygon grains that are observed in Figure 3(b), owing to the dynamic recrystallization during ERA. The broken secondary phases are mostly distributed along the grain boundaries. However, the grain boundaries are severely deformed along the rolling direction. A number of tangled dislocation accumulations and rod-liked precipitations distributed along the dislocation walls are observed in TEM bright field graphs (Figure 3(c)). Figure 3(d) shows the XRD patterns of different thermo mechanical processing conditions for the alloy, only peaks from α-Mg and the Mg2Sn phase are observed, indicating that only Mg2Sn exists other than the Mg matrix. Mn and Zr do not cause the formation of any new phases. The peak intensity and positions of ERA state alloy change toward weak and low angle directions compared with those for EA.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical tests at room temperature were performed to determine the effect of the extrusion, rolling, and ageing process, and the results are presented in

Figure 3. The micrographs and XRD patterns of EA and ERA alloy. (a) Micrograph of EA; (b)Micrograph of ERA; (c) TEM of ERA; (d) XRD patterns of EA and ER.

Figure 4. It can be seen that the additional rolling process can improve the tensile properties. The ERA alloy obtains the highest performance, and its YS, UTS and elongation are 179 MPa, 285 MPa and 14.5% respectively, which are mainly related to the grain refinement, twinning and dislocations caused by the plastic deformation containing extrusion and rolling, and the precipitation of fine Mg2Sn particles in the ageing treatment. In particular, the dislocations interacting closely with refined Mg2Sn precipitates can effectively improve the mechanical properties of the alloy.

Compared with the EA alloy, the hardness of the ERA alloy is 81 HV, an improvement of 6.7%, displaying better age-hardening of grain-refinement strengthening. Therefore, it is credible that the tensile properties of the alloy increased sharply because of the accumulated deformation of the ERA treatment in preventing edge cracking of the rolling process.

The tensile fracture surfaces of the peak-aged alloys were analyzed by SEM to infer the microscopic mechanisms controlling the overall fracture response. In Figure 5(a), cleavage steps and a river pattern are observed in the fracture surfaces of the EA sample, indicating the occurrence of the typical cleavage fracture mechanism. Many dimples and tearing ridges are observed on the fracture surface of the ERA alloy (Figure 5(b)). Some second phase particles are observed within these dimples. These deep dimples, which are associated with the drawing of particles, indicate that a certain amount of plastic deformation occurred before rupture. This effect will positively benefit the strengthening behavior

Figure 4. Mechanical properties of experimental alloy in different conditions.

Figure 5. Tensile fracture micrographs of the peak-aged alloys. (a) EA; (b) ERA.

instead of deteriorating the mechanical property because of its more refined microstructure.

4. Conclusion

Thermo mechanical treatments were performed on a Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr alloy. After EA of the as-cast alloy, dynamic recrystallization occurred; the tensile strength increased, and the ductility improved. After the ERA process, many twins appeared, dislocations were formed in the interior of the grains, and grain refinement was observed. Also, the hardness reached a maximum value of 81 HV, and the tensile elongation increased to 14.5%, which is mainly related to deformation twinning the formation of dislocations during the ER state, and fine Mg2Sn precipitates forming in the ageing treatment.

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by both Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (No. 2017-082) and the nature science foundation of Shanxi Province, China (No. 201701D121041), and we have no conflict of interest.

Cite this paper

Luo, X.P., Fang, D.Q. and Liu, B.S. (2018) Thermo-Mechanical Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg-5.0Sn-1.0Mn-0.4Zr Alloy. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 8, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2018.81004

References

  1. 1. Czerwinski, F., Kasprzak, W., Sediako, D., Emadi, D., Shaha, S.K., Friedman, J. and Chen, D.L. (2016) High-temperature Aluminum Alloys for Automotive Powertrains. Advanced Materials and Processes, 174, 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200500013

  2. 2. Song, G. (2005) Recent Progress in Corrosion and Protection of Magnesium Alloys. Advanced Engineering Materials, 7, 563-586.

  3. 3. Watarai, H. (2006) Trend of Research and Development for Magnesium Alloys. Science & Technology Trend, 18, 84-97.

  4. 4. Zhang, J.H., Zhang, M.L., Meng, J. Wu, R.Z. and Tang, D.X. (2010) Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Heat-Resistant High-Pressure Die-Cast Mg-4Al-xLa-0.3Mn (x = 1, 2, 4, 6) Alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A, 527, 2527-2537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.12.048

  5. 5. Wang, Y., Liao, X. and Zhu, Y. (2009) Grain Refinement and Growth Induced by Severe Plastic Deformation. International Journal of Materials Research, 100, 1632-1637. https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110230

  6. 6. Kondoh, K., et al. (2004) Materials and Processing Designs for Magnesium Alloys—Grain Refining by Repeated Plastic Working and Solid-State Synthesis of Mg2Si (Review). Advances in Technology of Materials and Materials Processing, 6, 328-335.

  7. 7. Kang, S.H., Lee, Y.S. and Lee, J.H. (2008) Effect of Grain Refinement of Magnesium Alloy AZ31 by Severe Plastic Deformation on Material Characteristics. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 201, 436-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.305

  8. 8. Sasaki, T., Elsayed, F., Nakata, T., Ohkubo, T., Kamado, S. and Hono, K. (2015) Strong and Ductile Heat-Treatable Mg-Sn-Zn-Al Wrought Alloys. Acta Materialia, 99, 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.060

  9. 9. Nayyeri, G. and Mahmudi, R. (2010) Effects of Sb Additions on the Microstructure and Impression Creep Behavior of A cast Mg-5Sn Alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 527, 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.056

  10. 10. Clark, J.B., Zabdyr, L. and Moser, Z. (1988) Phase Diagrams of Binary Magnesium Alloys. ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 353-364.

  11. 11. Clark, J.B., Zabdyr, L. and Moser, Z. (2001) Phase Diagrams of Binary Magnesium Alloys. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 117, 276-281.