Energy and Power Engineering, 2013, 5, 740-745
doi:10.4236/epe.2013.54B143 Published Online July 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/epe)
A New Placement Scheme of Distributed Generation in
Power Gr id *
Zhipeng Jiang1, Tiande Guo2, Wei Pei3
1Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
3Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Email: lstjzp07@yahoo.com.cn
Received March, 2013
ABSTRACT
Smart grid gets more and more popular today. Distributed generation is one of the key technologies, and especially, the
integration problem of the distributed generation is an important issue. Especially, the location and capacity of the dis-
tributed generation play an important role for the performance of the distribution network. In this paper, an optimization
model to minimize the loss cost of the unsatisfied demand is given. Th is model is based on a reliability computing me-
thod which avoiding power flow calculation in a previous work. Then the model is used on the IEEE-123 nodes ex-
periment network and a result of five distributed generation placement is got.
Keywords: Smart Grid; Distributed Generation; Optimal Integration ; Optimization Model
1. Introduction
The smart grid being more and more popular today and
distributed generation is one of the key technologies in it.
The distributed generation device is an independent gen-
eration, small modular and compatible with the environ-
ment whose power is from several kilowatts to 50 me-
gawatt. The power of the distributed generation is owned
by the power department, users or the third party, which
is used to meet the particular demand of the power sys-
tem and users. For example, adjusts the peak, supplies
the power for remote users and residents, decreases the
cost of the power transmission and transformation and
improves the reliability of the p ower supply. The distrib-
uted generation is deployed near the users in a distributed
way and it’s a system which can independently provide
power. The distributed generation mainly includes the
internal combustion engine micro gas turbine, wind
power generation as well as photovoltaic cells which use
liquid or gas as the fuel. The distributed generation is an
important supplement of self-healing strategy, which
plays an important role in peak averting, valley filling
and load balancing. However, it also brings about new
problems. For example, some types of distributed gen-
eration are stochastic, and increase the volatility of the
system voltage.
There are many issues concerned in distributed gen-
eration problem, among which the optimal integration is
one of the important problems. It involves many aspects
of factors. It has not only to find a proper optimization
objective, but also to analyze various elements like the
location, size and type of the distributed generation.
Hence, it is a very complicated issue. The location of
distributed generation is a location prob lem in the opera-
tions research, and it’s an NP (Non-Deterministic Poly-
nomial) problem which needs an appropriate algorithm to
solve it. The constraints need to synthesize the influence
of distributed generation on power grid when connecting
the grid, the equilibrium conditions of power gird and
voltage as well as the randomness of distributed genera-
tion; while objective function requires comprehensive
consideration of operation cost and power consumption.
2. Related Work
The In recent years, a variety of methods on the optimal
integration of distributed generation have been arisen. A
main method is establishing an optimization model with
multiple indicators as objective function and some char-
acteristics and restrictions of power grid as constraints.
The location and the access capacity of the distributed
generation can be achieved by solving the optimization
model. The most important object among these indicators
is to minimize the lin e loss [1-3]. In [1], th e authors gave
a method of line loss minimization based on analytical
method. The mathematical programming method is used
in [2] and in [3] the genetic algorithm is adopted. The
*This paper is supported by the Important Knowledge Innovation Pro-
j
ect of Chinese Academy of Sciences No.Y225011E
K
2
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. EPE
Z. P. JIANG ET AL. 741
cost minimization is also an important objective consid-
ered frequently. The representation of the cost is different
in different situation. For instance, the authors in [4]
consider the minimization of the cost from the perspec-
tive of distributed generation developers while the au-
thors in [5] consider it from that of operators, both them
adopts traditional mathematical optimization methods.
What mentioned above are all single-objective function
model and algorithm. For multi-objective programming,
in [6] the genetic algorithm based on trust region is given,
which optimizes five objectives including minimizing
power loss to find the optimal location and size of dis-
tributed generation. The randomness of load and distrib-
uted generation is considered in [7]. And its objective
function is given in the form of probability load current
in [8], in which the authors suppose that there is correla-
tion between distributed generations and loads. The
method in [9] is based on the Strength Pareto Evolution-
ary Algorithm (SPEA), and the objective function con-
tains the simple stochastic simulation of the distributed
generation and load, but this method is not superior to the
weighted single-objective programming, so the authors
suggest to adopting both of the two methods to seek op-
timal solution set. Literature [10] refers to calculate the
optimal operation of distributed generation according to
the method of multi-objective programming, with con-
sidering the uncertainty of distributed generation (e.g. the
wind power) and the relevance between the wind power
generation and the weather. Besides, in the literature, the
authors represent the changing condition of wind power
as time changes by the Markov's transition matrix. The
randomness of loads is considered when planning the
distribute d generation in [1 1] .
All the works above provide various objectives and
constrains. In most of these works heuristic algorithms
are used to solve the optimization models such as Ge-
netic Algorithm, Simulated Anneal Algorithm, and Parti-
cle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, etc. A new method
of reliability calculation of the power grid without con-
sidering the power flow calculation is proposed in [12].
However, the reliability calculation result is much con-
sistent with the actual reliability. Based on this method,
in this paper, an optimization model for minimizing the
total loss cost caused by the unsatisfied demand, and the
model is used on the IEEE-123 nodes experiment net-
work.
3. An Optimization Model Based on
Minimum Total Loss Cost Caused
by the Unsatisfied Demand
3.1. The Basic Model
Suppose there is a main power source supplying power in
the micro-grid with N load points, and the capacity of the
main power can satisfy all the load points' demand. In
order to keep the power grid stable, that is, to keep it ru n
normally when the main power source is out of order or
the power load increases suddenly at some nodes, the
distributed generation is added. Consider there is M dis-
tributed power generations will be integrated into the
power grid. Suppose each generation can directly con-
nect to only one load nodes and transport the power to
other nodes h op by hop.
For the convenience, in this problem, the capacity of
each distributed generation and the loads of each point
are supposed to be constant and only the active power is
considered. Meanwhile, according to the assumption in
[12], an important assumption in this model is that when
a node receives power from a distributed generation di-
rectly or from other nodes, it satisfies its own demand as
much as possible then transport the excess power to its
neighbor nodes. Only micro grid is studied in this paper,
so the transmission loss is not considered in the model.
The model is as follows:


()
()
min
..max,0
max ,0
0
01
unsatisfy
ii
i
unsatisfy use
ii
surplus use
iii
ijiikk
jNi k
surplus
ij i
jNi
ij ji
ik
kP
st PPP
PPP
PPxC
PP
PP
xor




i

3.2. The Explanation of the Variables
unsatisfy
i
P: The unsatisfied power demand of N o d e i
s
urplus
i
PThe residual power of Node i
use
i
PThe power demand of Node i
i
PThe total power that Node i can get
ij
PThe transmission power from Node i to Node j
k
CThe capacity of distributed generation k
i
kThe weight of Node i
1distributedgenerationconnectwithnodei
0e
lse
ik
x
3.3. The Explanation of the Objective Function
The objective function unsatisfy
ii indicates
i
kP
minimizing the total loss cost caused by the unsatisfied
demand
3.4. The Explanation of the Constraints
max ,0
unsatisfy use
ii
PP
i
P: If the total power that
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. EPE
Z. P. JIANG ET AL.
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. EPE
742
Node i gets is less than the demand of node i, the unsatis-
fied demand of Node i will equal to use
ii
PP; Else, it
will equal to 0;
nodes is adopted to carry out the simulation test, the load
and weight of the nodes are both constant and the units of
the nodes’ load and the capacity of the distributed gen-
eration are all kilowatt (kW). The network structure is
shown in Figure 1, and the parameters of the nodes are
shown in Table 1
i
: If the total power that
max ,0
surplus use
ii
PPP
Node i gets is more than or equal to its demand, the re-
sidual energy of Node i will equal to ; Else, it
will equal to 0.
use
ii
PPOn the test network of IEEE-123 nodes above, five
distributed generations are set, whose capacities are: C1
= 700, C2 = 650, C3 = 500, C4 = 350, C5 = 600 respec-
tively.
k
C: The total received power
()
ijiik
jNik
PPx


of node i is equal to the total energy supplied by the dis-
tributed generation directly connected with node i and
the power transported from the neighbor nodes of node i.
We establish a model according to the method pro-
posed in this paper, and solve it by Lingo. The results of
the distributed generation’s placement and power trans-
mission are as follows. The place result of the distributed
generation is shown in Figure 2 and the result of the
power transmission (direction and size) between the
nodes is shown in Table 2. The final value of the objec-
tive function (that is the total loss cost) is: 6868.2. And
()
s
urplus
ij i
jNi
PP
: The residual power of the node i
can be transported to its neighbor nodes through any way
of distribution, or keep it to itself.
0PP: The power can only be transported in
ij ji
one direction on each line Distributed generation P1 is placed on the node 36;
Distributed generation P2 is placed on the node 30;
4. Solution and Simulation Distributed generation P3 is placed on the node
160;
In this paper, the standard testing network of IEEE-123
33
32
31
27 26 25
28
29 30 250
1
3
4
56
2
78
12
11 14
10
20 19
22 21
18 35
37
40
135
48 47 49 50
45
41
51
44
46
42
43
36 38 39
66
65 64
63
62
60 160 67
57
58
59
5453
52 55 56
13
34
15
16
17
96
95
94
93
152
92 90 88
91 89 87 86
80
81
82 83
84
78
85
72
73 74
75
77
79
300 111 110
108
109 107
112113 114
105
106
101
102
103 104
450
100
97
99
68 69
70
71
197
151
150
61 610
9
24
23
251
195
451
149
350
98
76
76
Figure 1. The network structure of the IEEE-123 nodes.
Z. P. JIANG ET AL. 743
Table 1. The parameters of the nodes.
idload weightidload weightidload weight
1358.4141 202.7780 409.97
2407.2542203.2681401.7
3203.8543 206.5482 354.98
7359.5544 405.2684 401.96
4201.3145 354.1683 209.66
5404.9547 208.4885 201.04
6204.4346 356.2787 407.97
8407.8948 205.9588 404.14
1235 8.164970 9.258940 8.36
9202.6850 703.5790 358.82
1340 5.415140 7.819140 1.76
1435 5.015220 7.7892354.6
3435 6.825340 4.429340 3.34
1840 7.385440 6.1194358.2
1135 7.795535 1.689540 4.88
1040 3.485720 1.4996209.2
1520 7.125635 5.789820 2.64
16356.95820 8.019940 3.37
1740 2.466020 9.4110040 2.31
1920 2.075920 2.1745040 2.22
2140 5.496120 6.1210135 8.82
2035 9.646235 5.2210235 6.22
2240 4.066340 1.1110520 5.95
2340 6.276440 4.03103352.3
2435 3.016575 2.4610440 8.68
2540 7.766670 8.15106406.6
2635 3.3 6775 3.8108404.16
2835 5.556835 5.7610735 5.62
2740 7.297220 2.4910940 4.62
3135 9.029735 6.4230040 1.68
3320 9.636935 3.3711035 3.16
2940 5.927040 6.8911135 2.11
3040 2.2571207.2 11220 2.66
25040 2.347340 7.7311320 3.16
3235 3.327640 5.0511440 4.76
35208.57741051.75 135201.45
3640 3.297540 3.0614935 9.12
4035 8.337740 9.22152359.5
3735 3.198640 2.3716035 5.42
3840 9.367820 8.43197355.4
3920 4.157935 5.85
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. EPE
Z. P. JIANG ET AL.
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. EPE
744
1
3
4
56
2
78
12
11 14
10
20 19
22 21
18 35
37
40
135
33
32
31
27 26 25
28
29 30 250
48 47 49 50 51
44
45 46
42
43
41
36 38 39
66
65 64
63
62
60 160 67
57
58
59
5453
52 55 56
13
34
15
16
17
96
95
94
93
152
92 90 88
91 89 87 86
80
81
82 83
84
78
85
72
73 74
75
77
79
300 111 110
108
109 107
112113 11
4
105
106
101
102
103 104
450
100
97
99
68 69
70
71
197
151
150
61 610
9
24
23
251
195
451
149
350
76
98
76
4
P
2
P
1
P
5
P
3
P
Figure 2. The placement result of the distributed generation.
Table 2. The power flow transmission result. Distributed generation P4 is placed on the node 34;
Distributed generation P5 is placed on the node
106;
1->2 40 29->28 570 72->76 295
1->3 80 30->29 610 76->77 100
1->149 35 34->13 260 76->86 155
3->5 60 34->1555 77->78 60
5->6 20 35->40 525 78->80 40
7->1190 35->13520 86->87 115
8->7225 36->35 565 87->8975
8->12 35 36->3735 89->90 35
8->9 90 36->3860 101->102 110
9->14 70 38->3920 101->197 35
13->839040->4120 102->103 75
14->11 35 40->42 470 103->104 40
15->16 35 42->4320 105->101 180
18->13 170 42->44430 105->108 325
18->19 55 44->4570 106->105 525
19->20 35 44->47 320 106->107 35
21->18 265 45->4635 108->109 245
21->222047->4820 108->300 40
23->21 325 47->49280 109->110 205
25->23 365 49->50210 110->111 35
25->26 130 50->5140 110->112 135
26->27 60 67->72 355 112->113 115
26->31 35 67->9735 113->114 40
27->33 20 72->7340 160->67465
28->25 535
5. Conclusion
The optimal integration problem of distributed genera-
tion is one of the key issues of the smart power grids. In
this paper we propose an optimization model of placing
the distributed generation, aiming to minimize the total
loss cost caused by the unsatisfied power of every node.
Meanwhile, we use this model to a five distributed power
generation placement problem on the network of
IEEE-123 nodes. The result of the distributed generation
placement and the power transmission is got.
REFERENCES
[1] C. Wang and M. Hashem, “Analytical Approaches for
Optimal Placement of Distributed Generation Sources in
Power Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,
2004, 19.
[2] S. Narayan, S. M. Rau and W. M., “Yih-heu Optimum
Location of Resources in Distribution Planning,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, Vol. 9.
[3] J. O. Kim, S. W. Nam, S. K. Park and C. Singh, “Dis-
Z. P. JIANG ET AL. 745
persed Generation Planning Using Improved Hereford
Ranch Algorithm,” Electric Power Systems Research,
1998, Vol. 47, pp. 47-55.
doi:10.1016/S0378-7796(98)00038-8
[4] H. L. Willi s and W. G. “Scott Distributed Power Genera-
tion,” Planning and Evaluation. New York, USA: Marcel
Dekker; 2000, ISBN: 0-8247-0336-7.
[5] R. C. Dugan, T. E. McDermott and G. J. Ball, “Planning
for Distributed Generation,” IEEE Industry Applications
Magazine, 2001.doi:10.1109/2943.911193
[6] G. Celli, E. Ghiani, S. Mocci and F. Pilo, “A
Multi-objective Formulation for the Optimal Sizing and
Siting of Embedded Generation in Distribution Net-
works,” In: Power tech conference proceedings, 2003
IEEE, Vol. 1, 2003.doi:10.1109/PTC.2003.1304113
[7] G. Celli, E. Ghiani, S. Mocci and F. Pilo, “A
Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm for the Sizing
and Siting of Distributed Generation, IEEE Transactions
on Power System, 2005, 20.
[8] G. Celli, S. Mocci, F. Pilo and R. Cicoria, “Probabilistic
Optimization of MV Distribution Networks in Presence
of Distributed Generation. In: Proceedings of the 14th
PSCC; 2002.
[9] E. Haesen, J. Driesen and R. Belmans, “A Long-term
Multi-objective Planning Tool for Distributed Energy
Resources. In: IEEE PES Power Systems Conference &
Exposition, 2006, p. 741-747.
[10] A. C. Rueda-Medina, J. M. Lopez-Lezama and A.
Padilha-Feltrin, A Multi-objective Programming Ap-
proach for the Optimal Operation of Distributed Genera-
tion Considering Uncertainty.
[11] A. G. Marinopoulos, M. C. Alexiadis and P. S. Do-
kopoulos, “Energy Losses in a Distribution Line with
Distributed Generation Based on Stochastic Power Flow,”
Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 81, 2011, pp.
1986-1994.doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2011.06.006
[12] I.-S. Bae and J.-O. Kim, “Reliability Evaluation of Dis-
tributed Generation Based on Operation Mode,” IEEE
Tranactions Power Systems, Vol. 22, 2007, pp. 785-790.
doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2007.894842
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. EPE