Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 2013, 3, 436-440
Published Online November 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojapps)
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2013.37054
Open Access OJAppS
Social Organization of Transgender Sex Workers
Anwaar Mohyuddin*, Muhammad Ali
Department of Anthropology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Email: *unwaar@gmail.com, alighous@gmail.com
Received September 16, 2013; revised October 18, 2013; accepted October 25, 2013
Copyright © 2013 Anwaar Mohyuddin, Muhammad Ali. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons At-
tribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is pro-
perly cited.
ABSTRACT
This paper is an attempt to document life of male sex workers as transgender in Pakistan and to describe their cultural
practices with reference to ritual performs on different occasion. Qualitative research methods combing in-depth inter-
views, FGDs, and observation were employed to gather information. An effort has been made to investigate the cultural
life of the transgender and the pattern of their social interaction within the community as well as with the outsiders.
Analysis based on thematic description of the themes generated after r eviewing data. The r esear ch proc ess rev ealed th at
males who were engaged in the sex industry hav e two types of socio logical division: firs t, young and having male iden-
tity with potential to transform in transgender; while other transgender plays dual roles: a) within sex worker commu-
nity as transgender women, b) male outside the transgender community. These males fulfill their socio-psychological
and economic needs through entrance in the transgender community. Most of them consider themselves as having
feminine soul and masculine body. The male engaging in sex work is a complex phenomenon with reference to their
identity and performance of cultu ral rituals. An explor atory research stud y needs to be con du cted to unfold th e no tion of
dual identity which male sex workers have.
Keywords: Guru; Chela; Khusras; Kachay; Pakay; Yar; Garria; Power Structu re
1. Introduction
Gender is not something we are born with, and not so-
mething we have, but something we do [1] and sex is a
biological categorization based primarily on reproductive
potential, whereas gender is the social elaboration of
biological sex [2]. Around the world it is estimated that
2% - 3% of biological males engage in cross-dressing [3].
Sex work has always been relevant to queer and trans-
communities [4]. In most of the places around the world
transgender is isolated from the society. As in India 85%
of the transgender is thrown out of homes to survive as
sex worker and street dancer [5]. In contemporary usage,
“transgender” has become an umbrella term that is used
to describe a wide range of identities and experiences,
including but not limited to: pre-operative, post- opera-
tive and non-operative transsexual people (who strongly
identify with the gender opposite to their biological sex),
male and female “cross-dressers” (sometimes referred to
as “transvestites”, “drag queens”, or “drag kings”), and
men and women, regardless of sexual orientation, whose
appearance or characteristics are perceived to be gender
atypical [6]. According to epidemiological category of
biological male who sell sex, there are three sociologi-
cally different sexual identities: khusras (transgender),
khotkis (f emin ized male s) a nd banthas (mainstream male
identity). Both khusras and khotkis are organized in
strong social structures based on a shared identity [7].
However, to avoid imposing a “false clarity” on catego-
rization of identity and assumed behaviour, it is neces-
sary to go beyond verbal accounts to document the fluid-
ity of everyday reality [7]. This would widen sp ec tr u m f o r
the intervention to address issues and challenges which
are faced by the transgender sex worker.
Transgender is one of the deprived groups of the soci-
ety which are neglected in the social sphere. They are
faced with situation of isolation stigma and hatred due to
their identity crisis and the roles they are playing which
push them to join the sex work profession. Most of the
researchers have studied transgender with reference to
the HIV/AIDS. However, very few of the researchers had
focused their attention on the lives of transgender and
their culture. So, this research study will share cultural
life of the transgender and the community which they
have created in already existing world.
*Corresponding author.
A. MOHYUDDIN, M. ALI 437
2. Methodology
This research study is based on the descriptive research
design. This research design was adapted to get rich de-
scriptive details about the culture of the transgender and
other associated phenomena as this design could help us
to know what, how and why the things are happening.
We knew target population and were interested to cap-
ture their life in their community. So, descriptive re-
search design was chosen to get the cultural insight.
Qualitative research methodology was used for this study
which mainly included in-depth interviews, focus group
discussions and observation. With the use of qualitative
methods it was possible to collect empirical data regard-
ing their individual as well as their group lives. A sample
of 30 sex workers aging between 15 - 45 years was se-
lected through snow ball sampling technique. This sam-
ple included 20 male sex worker having transgender
identity were interviewed along with 8 male sex worker
have not transgender identity and 2 Gurus. In-depth in-
terviews were conducted with all of them. For this re-
search data was collected during September to December
2012 at Maripur Karachi Truck-Ada (truck stand) and
residential places of the sex workers in Machor Colony
and Agra Taj.
Objectives
1) To find out the way they (transgender) are in their
social life.
2) To know the rituals, custom, norms perform by the
transgender in their community.
3) To know transgender lives as sex worker.
3. Demographic Profile
As mentioned earlier 30 TGSW (transgender sex workers)
aging between 15 - 45 years were selected as sample for
this research. Majority among them were between 15 -
24 years. They belonged to different part of the Pakistan
however; majority of them came from Punjab (Hydera-
bad, Sialkot, Bahwalpur, Faisalabad and Sahiwal). From
their appearance and style they looked like khusras (the
third-gender), but, most of them were transgender. Here
by saying transgender we mean that they had changed
their gender identity and were portraying themselves as
female. While, by mean of biological division they were
male. Along with these transgender other major group in
this profession belonged to the Khusra community. By
using word Khusra we mean those people who neither
males nor the females. Some of the male were also
working as sex worker and living with the transgender
but they had dual role. When they were with transgender
they had their feminine names and adopted conversation
style like females. They performed and acted like trans-
gender. However, on the other hand they had their wives
and children and used to visit them back to their native
area. Usually these types of sex workers were coming to
the truck-stand as massager but not providing massage
services to their clients, actually they were performing as
sex workers. Hijras (the third-gender) of 40 years and
above were working as pimp as well. Following is the
sample profile (see Table 1).
4. Results and Discussion
The people in every society have different ranks as high
and low. People in different societies are distributed in
groups on the basis of this status called stratification.
This stratification may be on the basis of occupations,
caste, and education source of income, prestige and po-
litical power. The people attain th ese sources and get into
a class. In this way the whole society is divided into a
few classes, generally high, middle, lower middle and
lower. Stratification among TGWS was also found but
based on different factors. The first two are based on the
age and the next two are based on the biological status
and role. Their categories are as under.
Kachay (young): Tho se wh o we re less th an 18 year of
age or look younger like a child.
Pakkay (mature): Those who were above age of 18
years.
Some other characteristics of stratification were also
prevailing among them which are as under:
Khusra: These were less in number but had prominent
position among sex worker community. Most of the
gurus (leaders) among sex worker community were
Khusras”.
Pimp: These were also less in number. Their role was
to protect the sex workers and arrange customers for
them. They worked as agents as well as the sex wo r k er .
Sometimes they transported sex worker from one
place to other and took their share of money as book-
ing or transport charge s.
4.1. Young Sex Workers (Kachay)
These were the youngest group among TGWS and were
found very less in number. Mostly they did not have any
skills other then earn their livelihood through sex work
Table 1. Sample Profile.
Sr Age Occupation Frequency
1 15 - 18 6
2 19 - 24 8
3 25 - 29 5
4 30 - 34 5
5 35 - 40 3
6 41 - 45
Sex worker, Pimp, Massager,
3
Total 30
(Source: Socio-economic survey).
Open Access OJAppS
A. MOHYUDDIN, M. ALI
438
profession. Mostly they lived with one or two elder part-
ners, but not in big groups. They were totally under con-
trol of their partner and followed their direction in every
walk of their life. Main reason behind this partnership
was the protection for the younger because they were less
confident and were finding it difficult to face the social
surroundings. These young workers who lived with their
partners were called as kach ay and the people normally
referred as, “un ki pakki nhi howi abhi tak” (they are not
mature sex worker). One respondent said that “un ki abhi
tak kachi hay” (they are immature sex worker). It means
that they had opted sex as their profession but not work-
ing openly because they could not face police. They co u ld
not find their clients even. Their elder partners arranged
clients for them who stayed in contact with them for a
longer time. They did not change them frequently.
4.2. Power Structure among Young Sex Worker
(Kachay)
Young transgender-sex workers, who were commonly
known as kach a y, were earning more money as com-
pared to their elder colleagues. They had higher demand
among the clients however; to approach them was diffi-
cult. They had fewer but permanent and regular clients
who invested more on them. Their elder partner mostly
worked as pimp for them and kept all the money with
them. They just gave them pocket money. Some of the
young sex workers became popular among clients due to
their beauty and smartness, than elder partner became
extra caring for them fulfilling most of their demands.
When those youngsters started earning more and became
popular they started demanding more power and auton-
omy with reference to their mobility, development of
friendship and extra share of income. However, the elder
partners exercised all the means and ways to control
them. Ultimately those young sex workers became inde-
pendent.
4.3. Mature/Elder Sex Worker (Packay)
The transgender sex workers aging 18 years and above
are called as pakay. They mostly earn their livelihood
through sex trade. However, life history of some of the
workers indicated that in the past they were earning their
livelihood through other occupations as well. In their
appearance, some of them (packay) had dominant mas-
culine characteristics with male identity and the others
had feminine characteristics in their personality. Most of
the transgender in this profession belonged to this cate-
gory. They lived in shape of groups with one of them as
their leader known as “guru”. Some of the groups in-
cluded khusras among them as well and those groups had
a better reputation and respect. In majority of the cases
guru are selected from the khusra community. However,
notion of packa was not associated with the khusras.
This term specifically referred to the adult transgender
sex workers only. They were difference from kachay sex
workers in different regards. They were not hiding them-
selves like the youngsters. They were known to the pub-
lic living in their su rroundings. They often visited public
places in search of the clients as well. This openness ba-
sically was the demarcation between kacha and packa
workers. One of the respondents (23 year old-sex worker)
reported that “jin ki pakki ho jati hay wo hei kholay aam
public mian a ker appna dhanda kerty hain or yeh tab hei
hoti hay jab tajrba hota hay” (those who work openly
know as mature, this happened when they acquire enough
experience in sex industry).
4.4. Power Structure among Packay
As discussed earlier mostly adult workers (packay) lived
in groups and their groups were controlled by the gurus.
The place where they lived was known as dera. The group
size varied from 3 - 6 members majority of which were
transgender and sometime one or two khusras as well.
They lived under defined rule and regulation of their
guru who was considered as head of the family and had a
significant influence on their lives. Guru also got some
share from their income. He was looking after and taking
care of all group activities. He was controlling the visits
of the guest/c lients as well. Mo stly the sex wo rkers s ou g h t
his permission before inviting their clients o r guests. One
of the sex workers Dilshad (21 year of age) gave us an
appointment but later refused because his guru did not
allow him to bring us at their dera. He said, “Guru ji
kehty hain kissi ko bahir say lanay ki zaroora t nhi hay
(guru says that you do not need to bring outside here).
Researchers further inquired about the reasons why guru
refused. He said, “Guru jo kehty hain theak kehty hain,
guru tasali kay bagir kissi ko anay nhi detay” (what so
ever guru says is right, without clarification guru do not
allow out si d er).
Guru was also responsible for the arrangements of the
various rituals performed in their community. Gurus hav-
ing performed more rituals and at larger scale were con-
sidered as big gurus. They had better reputation and re-
spect in the community. Ti me of the rituals, participation,
dress patterns and places were always finalized by the
guru. Researchers could not attend any rituals because a
long time was needed to earn their confidence and per-
mission to attend the rituals. Even the members were not
allowed to discuss place and time of any ritual which
they called Jalsa. One of the respondents said, “Hum ko
ijazat nhi hoti kay appni community say abhir kay logo
ko Jalsay ki jaga ka batain” (We are not allowed to in-
form outsiders about the place of festival).
Open Access OJAppS
A. MOHYUDDIN, M. ALI 439
4.5. Yar Making Ritual (Marriage)
One of the rituals performed among transgender was Yar
Making Ritual. This ritual was similar to a marriage ce-
remony. Marriage is considered as union of two opposite
sex people with socially legitimate sexual relationship.
However, among transgender community Yar Making
Ritual is performed between two people of same sex but
different gender. The concept of yar among transgender
sex workers vary from person to person. One of the re-
spondents (18-year-old sex worker) stated, “Yar wo hota
hay jo zada tar sath rehy or us say sab say zada pyar
keray” (Yar is the person who lives with sex worker and
loves him more than anybody). Another 24 year old-sex
worker said, “Jo hum ko sab say za da pyar keray or
hamari zaroor to ko pora keray wo Yar hota hay” (Yar is
the person who loves us more than anybody and fulfills
our needs) .
Initially yar appears in the life of sex wo rker as client.
Ultimately relations of intimacy, affectation, closeness
brings both the parties (sex worker and client) close to
each other. They start living together and stay with each
other for most of the times. Sex worker community starts
recognizing them as a couple having close relationship.
In this regard one of the respondents a 33 year old-sex
worker said, “Yar to wo hota hay jo har waqat sath ho or
logo ko pata ho” (Yar is th e person most often stays with
the sex worker and people know about their relationship).
Yar starts exercising his authority and control over the
sex worker. He becomes his sole client and never likes to
share his passive partner with any other. He never allows
his to entertain the other clients. He solely bears his ex-
penditures. Than sex worker demands his yar to perform
Yar Making Ritual front of his community. Sometimes
yar agrees to perform ritual and sometimes denies. One
of the respondents a 23 year old-sex worker stated, “Yar
to har koi bana chata hay magar yar banay ka hosla wo
hei kerta hay jo sach a hota hay” (everybody wants to be
a yar but very few of them dare to perform ritual jalsa).
As already discussed all the rituals performed among
transgender sex workers were known as jalsa and con-
trolled by guru. Main purpose of these rituals was just to
arrange for community gathering. Yar Making Rituals
were also controlled by the guru. However, the expendi-
tures were mostly borne by the yar. These expenditures
were directly associated with love and closeness among
the worker and yar . If yar was truly in love with his
partner (commonly known as garria) than he spent more.
One respondent (37 year old guru) said, “jeetna zada yar
pyar kerta ho ga woo otna zada khurcha keray ga” (the
yar who loves more spends more). Another respondent
(42 year old guru) stated, “Yeh yar ki zamadari hoti hay
kay wo hamaray guru ki izat keray or un ko tohfa day
(this is yars responsibility to respect guru and present
him gifts).
Guru used to invite the community member for jalsa.
However, before the invitation he consulted his chela
(disciple of guru, a sex worker) to know about the am ount
of money given by the yar for the ja lsa because lunch or
dinner which is known as valima had to be served to all
invitees. So number of the guests had to be in accordance
with the money available. Yar presented gifts to the guru
and sex worker at the occasion of Yar Making Rituals.
He also presented ladies clothing to the yar for the occa-
sion. Sex worker dressed up like a bride and used cos-
metics also. If garria did not wear ladies dress, at least he
had to put dupata (scarf) on his head. Among sex worker
community all these kind of preparation enhanced the
prestige of sex worker as well as his guru. A 26 year
old-sex worker pointed out, “os din ka maza hei koch or
hota hay jeetna acha jalsa hota hay otna hei hum khoob
tyari kertay hain” (day of jalsa brings a lot of entertain-
ment and our preparation is also linked with it. If the
jalsa is bigger we prepare ourselves better).
The ritual completed after exchange of rings in the
fingers of garria and yar. All the guests cheered, pre-
sented gifts to sex worker and yar. After performing Yar
Making Ritual, garria was treated as wife of yar. While,
in some cases sex workers fall in love with some specific
client and started providing him services free of cost.
Unconditionally and without any ritual they started living
together. Garria bore all the expenditure of his yar and
only demanded love, care and affectation from him. He
always remained prepared for any type of sacrifice for
his yar and in return he demanded faithfulness. He de-
veloped hatred and jealousy when his yar made sexual
relation with other sex worker or when he did not give
attention to him. Once a sex worker tried to kill his yar
because, he was not paying full attention to him. Another
22 year old sex worker said, “agar yar tmara na ho to us
ko kissi or ka bhe nhi hona chay”. (If yar did not belong
to you then he would not h ave relation with the others as
well).
4.6. Guru Making Ritual
Guru was the most important person of sex worker com-
munity. Most of the gurus attained this status on th e basis
of their age, experience as sex worker and their relations
with the community members. All of the gurus in this
community were above 35 year of age and some of them
had primary level education also. Two of them were skil-
led laborers who later switched over as sex workers. Two
of them also had families in their native villages. In itially
they started their carrier as male sex worker but later
shifted their identity as transgender. They had multifac-
eted manifestation of gender identity. On one hand they
were fathers, brothers, and sons, while on the other hand
Open Access OJAppS
A. MOHYUDDIN, M. ALI
Open Access OJAppS
440
they were transgender with feminine name wearing la-
dies cloth and behaved like females.
Chela (sex worker) is the person who gave identity to
other sex worker as a guru through acceptance of his
experience and adoption as a leader who could support
him. A 32 year old sex worker said, “Guru hay to hum
hain” (our existence is because of guru). Another one
said, “Guru to hamari ankhain hota hay” (guru is our
eyes). Third respondent said, “Guru ki zindagi hei zamany
dhekty howay guzarti hay jo wo janta hay main nhi janta
(guru is experienced and he knows those things which we
do not).
For this purpose chela organized a ceremony which
was known as “Jalsa”. In this ceremony chela and guru
invited all other community member and performed a ri-
tual. In this ritual guru made a whole in the ear of the
chela. After performing this ritual and making whole in
the ear they became guru and chela. Guru enjoyed the
status of father/mother for his chela. During these ritual
gu ests and the chela presented gifts to the guru and some-
time guru also presented gifts to the chela as well. The
value of the gift was determined by its price and pre-
ciousness. Presenting precious gift to guru enhanced his
prestige and became a symbol of strong relationship be-
tween each other. A 29 year old respondent said, “Jeetna
jalsa acha ho ga otni hei humari izat ho gi” (Julsa deter-
mine our respect).
5. Conclusions
Formation of transgender community is the coping strat-
egy against the isolation and stigma. Most of the trans-
gender had multifaceted manifestation of sexual identity.
They were performing dual roles in their social and sex-
ual life. When they had status of husbands and fathers
they had identity of transgender as well. Most of them
preferred to be “transgender women”. It might be the
reason that they were male and had feminine orientations
in their self. They lived in groups and were controlled by
the guru. Younger sex workers who even didn’t have a
complete identity as transgender used to live with one
partner who actually controlled his business. However, as
time went by, when he acquired his identity and started
earning money then he joined the community of the
transgender.
In addition, various rituals were performed by the
transgender sex worker community. All of these rituals
were created on the pattern of societal rituals. History of
these rituals was not known, while its functional utility
was visible. These rituals transformed their psychological
condition through practical behavior. Through birth ritual
transgender sex workers fulfill their psychological needs.
Physically they were born as males but psychologically
they wanted to be female. However, in their native com-
munity they were not allowed to be trans-women or they
did not have courage to do so. Therefore, through mar-
riage ritual they fulfilled their psychological need by
playing bridal role. Furthermore, they faced stigma, ha-
tred and aggression. So by performing this role they ful-
filled their desire to have a person who loves them with-
out discrimination on the basis of their identity.
Guru Making Ritual provided guider, protector and ah
father to the transgender. He taught his chela about the
profession and introduced him into the community. Be-
ing chela of Guru, sex workers acquired recognition and
social prestige among their community. Moreover, eco-
nomic as well as social utility was highly associated with
all ritu als. Sex worker community maintained power stru-
cture which performed various functions and fulfilled
their social, moral, economic and psychological needs to
sustain rigid behavior against their identity as sex wor-
ker.
REFERENCES
[1] C. West and D. H. Zimmerman, “Doing Gender,” Gen-
der and Society, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1987, pp. 125-151.
[2] P. Eckert and G. S. McConnell, “Language and Gender,”
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147
[3] B. Reed, et al., “Gender Variance in the UK: Prevalence,
Incidence, Growth and Geographic Distribution,” Gender
Identity Research and Education Society, 2009.
[4] P. S. Savati, “Sex Work and Queer Politics in Three
Acts,” 2013.
http://sfonline.barnard.edu/a-new-queer-agenda/sex-work
-and-queer-politics-in-three-acts/
[5] http://www.dellchallenge.org/projects/transgender-astitv
[6] United Nation Development Programme, “Hijras/Trans-
gender in India: HIV, Human Rights and Social Exclu-
sion,” 2013.
http://www.undp.org/content/india/en/home/knowledge-a
nd-solutions/voices-of-the-marginalized/hijras_transgend
erinindiahivhumanrightsandsocialexclusion/
[7] M. Collumbien, A. Qureshi, R. K. Verma and Naveed-
i-Rahat, “Reaching Male and Transgender Sex Worker
Communities in Pakistan: Addressing Public and Private
Identities,” Presented at XVII International AIDS Con-
ference, 3-8 August 2009, Mexico City, pp. 1.