Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
			![]() Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 2013, 3, 75-80  http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2013.32A012 Published Online July 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojfd)  Numerical Study on Internal Flow of Small Axial Flow   Fan with Splitter Blades  Lifu Zhu, Yingzi Jin*, Yuzhen Jin, Yanping Wang, Li Zhang  The Province Key Laboratory of Fluid Transmission Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China  Email: *jin.yz@163.com  Received May 30, 2013; revised June 7, 2013; accepted June 14, 2013  Copyright © 2013 Lifu Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which  permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.  ABSTRACT  The splitter blades are widely used in axial compressors and play an active role in the improvement of the overall per-  formance of compressors. However, little research on the application of splitter blades to small axial flow fans is con-  ducted. This paper designs a splitter blade small axial flow fan (model B) with a small axial flow fan as the prototype  fan (model A) by adding short blades at the second half part of the passageway among long blades of model A. The  steady simulation for the two models was conducted with the help of RNG k-ε turbulence model provided by software  Fluent, and static characteristics and internal flow characteristics of the two models were compared and analyzed. Re-  sults show that splitter blades can improve the unsteady flow in the small flow rate region and also have a positive role  to increase static pressure rise and efficiency in the higher flow rate region. The variation of static pressure gradient on  the meridian plane in model B is well-distributed. The static pressure on the blade surface of model B distributes more  uniformly. Splitter blades can suppress the secondary flow from pressure side to suction side in the leading edge be-  cause the pressure difference between suction side and pressure side in model B is generally lower than that of model A.  And it also can restrain the vortex shedding and flow separation, and further it may be able to get the aerodynamic noise  lower because static pressure gradient on the blade surface is well-distributed and the vortex shedding is not developed.  Therefore, the performance of the fan with splitter blades is better than that of the prototype fan. The findings of this  paper can be a basis for the design of high performance small axial flow fans.  Keywords: Small Axial Flow Fan; Splitter Blade; Internal Flow; Performance  1. Introduction  The technology of splitter blade is adding short blades at  the passageway among the original long blades of impel-  lers, and the splitter blade is known as short blade or  small blade. The short blades and long blades are alterna-  tive arrangements, which can improve the distribution of  the internal flow field of impellers; what’s more, it also  can increase the load of blades and pressure ratio of im-  pellers, it is an effective method to improve the overall  performance of impellers [1]. The technology of splitter  blade is widely used in centrifugal impellers, and then  the research and application in the axial impellers are  starting lately. In 1974, Wennerstrom [2,3] applied the  technology of splitter blade in the axial compressors, he  decreased the deviation angle of outlet airflow in the high  load rotor by changing the aerodynamic arrangement.  Because of being limited by the methods of numerical  simulation and experiment at that moment, the applica-  tion of splitter blades to the axial impellers was not suc-  cessful and this technology was stalled. Since 1980s,  with the development of computer and methods of full  three-dimensional numerical simulation, the technology  of splitter blade was applied again and it had obtained the  significant achievements [4-6]. Tzuoo et al. [7] reviewed  the results of a detailed analytical study performed on  Wennerstrom’s rotor, followed by the details of a redes-  ign effort using advanced design methodology, and the  results showed that the extensive flow separation ob-  served in Wennerstrom’s rotor can be completely elimi-  nated by redesigning the main blade and splitter vane.  Yongxin Zhang et al. [8] found that splitter could recon-  struct the balance of pressure in rotor passage, and con-  trolled the flow near rotor blade. Ming Yan et al. [9]  studied flow characteristics of one axial compressor rotor  with splitter, they concluded that the rotor with splitter  could be operated with higher total pressure ratio, higher  efficiency and larger mass flow than normal designed  rotors, under the high loaded condition and with the same  *Corresponding author.  C opyright © 2013 SciRes.                                                                                OJFD  ![]() L. F. ZHU    ET  AL.  76  surge margin. Besides, many scholars paid their attention  to the influence of the chord length of splitter blades and  circumferential position in impeller to the performance of  rotors [10,11].  The small axial fans are influenced by sizes and appli-  cations, and the internal flow characteristics of small  axial fans are different from the large scale fans. So, the  researches about small axial flow fans have attracted  many scholars in recent years. The application of splitter  blades in axial machineries is mainly concentrated on  high-loaded compressors currently. However, little re-  search on the application of splitter blades to small axial  flow fans is conducted. This paper designs a splitter  blade small axial flow fan (model B) with a small axial  flow fan as the prototype fan (model A) by adding short  blades at the second half part of the passageway among  long blades of model A. The steady simulation for the  two models is conducted with the help of RNG k-ε tur-  bulence model provided by software Fluent, and static  characteristics and internal flow characteristics of the two  models are compared and analyzed.  2. Geometrical Models  In this paper, model A is the prototype fan, as shown in  Figure 1(a).The diameter of fan is 85 mm, hub ratio is  0.72, number of blades is 5, the rated rotating speed is  3000 r/min, and the tip clearance is 1.5 mm. On the basis  of model A, this paper designs a small axial flow fan  with splitter blades (model B), i.e. adding short blades at  the second half part of the passageway among long  blades of model A, as shown in Figure 1(b). Meanwhile,  the location of short blades is in the middle of passage-  ways, the geometric similarity ratio between long blades  and short blades is 5:2.  Figure 2 shows the blade cascade of small axial fan  with splitter blades. It represents the distribution of short  blades in the passageway clearly. Meanwhile, it also can  be found that the aerodynamic arrangement of model B  must be changed by splitter blades, and differ from  model A.  (a)                          (b)  Figure 1. Fan models. (a) Model A; (b) Model B.  3. Meshing and Numerical Simulation  3.1. Computational Domain and Grid  In this study, the software Gambit is applied to divide  grids, and the center of hub is set as the coordinate origin.  To ensure the reliability of numerical calculation, the  inlet and outlet of fan should be extended. The computa-  tional domain is divided into 4 parts: the extension region  of inlet and outlet, rotating fluid region and pipeline re-  gion, as shown in Figure 3. Meanwhile, non-structural  grids (tetrahedral T-grid) are used in rotating fluid region  and pipeline region, and the Figure 4(a) represents the  grids of fan. The length of the extension of inlet is 85  mm and its diameter is 120 mm while the extensions of  outlet are 510 mm and 340 mm respectively. The struc-  tural grids (hexahedral cooper mesh) are used in the re-  gions of front channel and back channel, and the interval  of grids is three, as shown in Figure 4(b). additionally,,  the degree of twist of grids is predominantly between 0.1 -  0.5.  3.2. Boundary Conditions and Numerical  Calculation  In this paper, mass flow inlet is set as inlet boundary   Pressure side  Suctio n side Rotation directio n Flow Figure 2. Blade cascade of model B.  Pipeline region Rotating fluid region  Front channel Inlet Outlet Back channel  340 510  85 85 120 Figure 3. Computational domain.  Copyright © 2013 SciRes.                                                                                OJFD  ![]() L. F. ZHU    ET  AL. 77 (a)  (b)  Figure 4. Computational grids. (a) Girds of fan; (b) Girds of  the extension of inlet and outlet.  condition, while, the outlet boundary condition is pres-  sure outlet. The solid walls such as vane surfaces and hub  satisfy the no-slip condition in the computational do-  main.  The finite volume method is carried out in numerical  calculation. It is assumed that the flow field of the im-  peller is incompressible and inviscid. The steady simula-  tion for the two models is conducted with the help of  RNG k-ε turbulence model provided by software Fluent.  Meanwhile, second order upwind difference scheme is  adopted as numerical discretization method of governing  equation. The residuals are equal or less than the given  standard (10−3), and relative error of flow rate at the inlet  as well as outlet is less than 0.5%, then the calculation is  convergence.  4. Results and Discussions  4.1. Static Characteristics of Models  The static characteristics are an important factor to ana-  lyze the performance of small axial fan. Meanwhile, the  static characteristics are reflected by the P-Q and the η-  Q performance curves in general, where P is static pres-  sure and η is efficiency. In this research, the different  inlet flow rates are set, and the steady flow fields of fans  are got in 21 flow-rate conditions from Q = 0.002 kg/s to  Q = 0.012 kg/s at the flow-rate interval of Q = 0.0005  kg/s. Figures 5  and 6 represent P-Q and η-Q performance  curves obtained from steady simulation of two models.  Figure 5. Performance curve of flow rate and static pres-  sure.  Figure 6. Performance curve of flow rate and efficiency.  From Figure 5, it can be seen that the static pressure  rise at the inlet and outlet of the two models decrease  with the increase of inlet flow rate Q on the whole. In  addition to this, when the inlet flow rate Q is less than  0.045 kg/s, fans are working under the small flow rate at  the moment, so the flow is unsteady. For this reason, the  curve of model A have a concave region, nevertheless,  this phenomenon does not appear in model B. Thus it can  be concluded that splitter blades can improve the un-  steady flow in the small flow rate region. When the inlet  flow rate Q > 0.045 kg/s, the static pressure rise of model  B is always higher than that of model A. Hence, splitter  blades have a positive role to increase the static pressure  rise.  Figure 6 shows the η-Q curves of two models. It is  found that the efficiency of the two models are closely  similar while 0.002 kg/s < Q < 0.006 kg/s, when Q >  0.006 kg/s, the efficiency of model B is notably higher  Copyright © 2013 SciRes.                                                                                OJFD  ![]() L. F. ZHU    ET  AL.  78  than that of model A.  4.2. Pressure Distribution  Figures 7(a) and (b) illustrate the contour distribution of  the static pressure on the meridian plane of two models  respectively when the mass flow rate is 0.007 kg/s. It  indicates that the pressure at the outlet is higher than inlet  pressure because of the influence of fans. And beyond  this, it also shows that the static pressure rise at the inlet  and outlet of model B is higher than that of model A.  From Figure 7(a), it represents that there is a low pres-  sure region in front of the fan and this region is sur-  rounded by the higher pressure region, then the variation  of pressure gradient in model B is well-distributed in  Figure 7(b). Furthermore, the distribution of pressure  gradient is symmetrical distributed along the axis of hub  in model B, while model A is deflected sideways. For  these reasons, the internal flow of model A is very com-  plicated, so it may be easy to cause secondary flow and  vortex.  Figure 8 represents the distribution of the static pres-  sure along with the axial direction of two models. The  abscissa is axial position in this figure. After analysis, it  can be seen that the pressure at the outlet is higher than  inlet pressure, and the maximum pressure of model A is  higher than that of model B in the rotating fluid region or  Low pressure region  (a)  (b)  Figure 7. Distribution of static pressure on the meridian  plane. (a) Model A; (b) Model B.  5.00e+00 0.00e+00 -5.00e+00 Static Pressure/Pa  -1.00e+01 -1.50e+01 -2.00e+01 -2.50e+01 -3.00e+01 -3.50e+01 -4.00e+01 -100 100200 300 4005000 Position (mm)  (a)  5.00e+00 0.00e+00 Static Pressure/Pa  -1.00 e+01 -1.50 e+01 -2.00 e+01 -2.50 e+01 -3.00 e+01 -3.50 e+01 -4.00 e+01 -100 100200 300 400 5000 Position (mm)  -4.50 e+01 -5.00 e+00 (b)  Figure 8. Distribution of thwith the  ipeline region. It also concludes that the static pressure  ribution of static pressure on suction side and  pr e static pressure along  axial direction. (a) Model A; (b) Model B.  p rise at the inlet and outlet of model B is higher than that  of model A, which is the same as the conclusions of  Figure 7.  The dist essure side in two models is shown in Figure 9. It can  be seen from the figure that the static pressure of pres-  sure side is generally higher than that of suction side.  Then by contrasting Figures 9(a) and (b), it can be found  that the static pressure on pressure side of model B dis-  tributes more uniformly and the static pressure of pres-  sure side in model A is obviously higher than that of  model B, which means fluid can be transmitted smoothly  in model B because of lower energy consumption to bal-  ance the pressure gradient. Moreover, pressure pulsation  amplitude of turbulent boundary layer may be reduced,  which controls the generation of separation vortices. And  combining with the figures of suction side of two models,  it concludes that splitter blades maybe can restrain reflux  and vortex to some extent. Besides these, the figure also  shows that the pressure difference between suction side  and pressure side in model B is on the whole lower than  Copyright © 2013 SciRes.                                                                                OJFD  ![]() L. F. ZHU    ET  AL. 79 (a)  (b)  (c)  (d)  Figure 9. Distribution of staticessure on suction side and   surfaces of two models  ar ve sur-  fa  pr pressure side in two models. (a) Pressure side of model A;  (b)   P r es s ur e   s i de  of model B; (c) Suc tion side of  model  A ;   ( d)   Suction side of model B.  that of model A, especially in the leading edge. So, the  secondary flow from pressure side to suction side can be  suppressed.  4.3. Vorticity Distribution  Vorticity derives from the velocity gradient exist in the  flow field, and it is an important physical quantity to de-  scribe the internal flow of fluid, because the vorticity  relates to flow separation, aerodynamic noise and other  phenomena in the flowing fluid. Therefore, in order to  further understand the internal flow characteristics, the  vorticity distribution of small axial fan with splitter  blades should be discussed.  In this research, the rotative e selected as object of study, where the rotative surface  is also known as S1 stream surface. Figure 10 shows the  geometrical position of the rotative surface at 1/3 blade  height, the diameter of rotative surface is 69 mm.  The vorticity contour distribution on the rotati ce at 1/3 blade height of two models is shown in Fig-  ure 11. From Figures 11(a) and (b), it can be seen that  the vortex shedding is existed in the trailing edge of  model A because the highly centralized region of vortic-  ity is usually regarded as vortex. However, the vortex  shedding is not developed in model B. The existence of  the vortex may increase energy consumption and degrade  performance of fans. Meanwhile, aerodynamic noise of  model A is higher than that of model B according to the  vortex-sound theory. Therefore, it can be concluded that  Figure 10. Geometrical position of the rotative surface at  1/3 blade height.  Vortex shedding  (a)  (b)  Figure 11. The vorticity con distribution on the rotative tour surface at 1/3 blade height. (a) Model A; (b) Model B.  Copyright © 2013 SciRes.                                                                                OJFD  ![]() L. F. ZHU    ET  AL.  Copyright © 2013 SciRes.                                                                                OJFD  80  hed-  all axial fan with splitter blades.  e unsteady flow of sm  transmitted smoothly in the small axial fa  shedding and  flo ants from the National splitter blades may be able to suppress the vortex s ding and flow separation, and then improve the perform-  ance of fans to some extent, such as static characteristics  and aerodynamic noise.  5. Conclusions  The paper designs a sm With the help of the numerical simulation, the influence  of splitter blades on the performance of small axial fan is  investigated. The static characteristics of models are rep-  resented, and the internal flow characteristics are dis-  cussed from two aspects, i.e. pressure and vorticity. The  conclusions are shown as followed:  1) Splitter blades can improve th  [4] all axial flow fan in the small flow rate region. When  the inlet flow rate Q > 0.045 kg/s, the static pressure rise  of model B is obviously higher than that of model A, and  the efficiencies of the two models are closely similar  while 0.002 kg/s < Q < 0.006 kg/s; when Q > 0.006 kg/s,  the efficiency of model B is notably higher than that of  model A. So, splitter blades have a positive role to in-  crease the static pressure rise and efficiency in the higher  flow rate region.  2) Fluid can be  [7] n with splitter blades, because the static pressure dis-  tributes more uniformly. And pressure pulsation ampli-  tude of turbulent boundary layer may be reduced, which  controls the generation of separation vortices. Splitter  blades can suppress the secondary flow from pressure  side to suction side in the leading edge.    3) Splitter blades can restrain the vortex w separation, and further it may be able to get the  aerodynamic noise lower because static pressure gradient  on the blade surface is well-distributed and the vortex  shedding is not developed.  6. Acknowledgements  This work was supported by gr  [11] Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51006090)  and the Major Special Project of Technology Office in  Zhejiang Province (No. 2011C11073, No. 2011C16038).  REFERENCES  [1] J. F. Zhang, Y Yuan, L. T. Ye, et al., “Research State of  The Centrifugal Machineries with Impeller Adding Split-  ter Blades,” Fluid Machinery, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2011, pp.  38-44.  [2] A. J. Wennerstrom and G. R. Frost, “Design of a Rotor  Incorporating Splitter Vanes for a High Pressure Ratio  Supersonic Axial Compressor Stage,” United States Air  Force Systems Command, ARL-TR-74-0110, 1974.  [3] A. J. Wennerstrom, “Test of a Supersonic Axial Com-  pressor Stage Incorporating Splitter Vanes in The Rotor,”  United States Air Force Systems Command, ARL-TR-  75-0165, 1975.   X. Qiu and T. Dang, “Three-Dimension Inverse Method  for Turbomachine Blading with Splitter Blades,” ASME  Paper, 2000-GT-0526, 2000.  [5] H. P. Li and H. X. Liu, “Numerical Simulation Analysis  of Leakage Flow in Compressor Cascade with Splitter,”  Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astro-  nautics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2007, pp. 31-34.  [6] H. P. Li and H. X. Liu, “Analysis of Flow Mechanism in  2-D Compressor Cascade with Splitter,” ASME Paper,  GT-2005-68207, 2005.    K. L. Tzuoo, S. S. Hingorani and A. K. Sehra, “Optimiza-  tion of a Highly-Loaded Axial Splittered Rotor Design,”  Revue Francaise de Mecanique, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1992, pp.  235-246.  [8] Y. X. Zhang, Z. P. Zou, M. Yan and M. Z. Chen, “Flow  Analysis of a Single-Stage Axial Flow Compressor with  Splitter Rotor,” Journal of Aerospace Power, Vol. 19, No.  1, 2004, pp. 89-93.  [9] M. Yan and M. Z. Chen, “Flow Performance Analysis in  an Axial Compressor Rotor with Splitter,” Journal of  Propulsion Technology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2002, pp. 280-  282.  [10] X. M. Sun, P. G. Yan, S. T. Wang and Q. Zhong, “Inves-  tigation of the Influence of Splitter Chord Length on the  Transonic Axial Fan Rotor,” Journal of Aerospace Power,  Vol. 22, No. 12, 2007, pp. 2050-2054.   L. Xue and W. J. Han, “Effects of Circumferential Con-  figuration Concerning Splitter Blade on the Aerodynamic  Performance in a Transonic Axial Fan,” Journal of Har-  bin Institute of Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010, pp. 75-  81.   | 
	







