Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.08 No.02(2017), Article ID:74203,18 pages
10.4236/jmp.2017.82015
Alignment of Quasar Polarizations on Large Scales Explained by Warped Cosmic Strings. PART II: The Second Order Contribution
Reinoud Jan Slagter1,2
1Asfyon, Bussum, The Netherlands
2Amsterdam University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Copyright © 2017 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received: January 17, 2017; Accepted: February 14, 2017; Published: February 17, 2017
ABSTRACT
We find an azimuthal-angle dependent approximate wave like solution to second order on a warped five-dimensional manifold with a self-gravitating U(1) scalar gauge field (cosmic string) on the brane using the multiple-scale method. The spectrum of the several orders of approximation show maxima of the energy distribution dependent on the azimuthal-angle and the winding numbers n of the subsequent orders of scalar field. This breakup of the quantized flux quanta does not lead to instability of the asymptotic wavelike solution, due to the suppression of the n-dependency in the energy mo- mentum tensor components by the warp factor. This effect is triggered by the contribution of the five dimensional Weyl tensor on the brane. This con- tribution can be understood as dark energy and can trigger the self-acceleration of the universe without the need of a cosmological constant. There is a striking relation between the symmetry breaking of the Higgs field described by the winding number and the SO(2) breaking of the axially symmetric configuration into a discrete subgroup of rotations about
. The discrete sequence of non-axially symmetric deviations, cancelled by the emission of gravitational waves in order to restore the SO(2) symmetry, triggers the pressure
for discrete values of the azimuthal-angle. There can be a possible relation between the recently discovered angle-preferences of polarization axes of quasars on large scales and our theoretical predicted angle-dependency and can be an evidence for the existence of cosmic strings. The discovery of the increase of polarization rate in smaller subgroups of the several large- quasar groups (LQGs), the red shift dependency and the relative orientation of the spin axes with respect to the major axes of their host LQGs, point at a fractional azimuthal structure, were also found in our cosmic string model. This peculiar discontinuous large scale structure, i.e., polarizations directions of multiples of, for example,
or
, can be explained by the spectrum of azimuthal-angle dependent wavelike modes without the need of conventional density perturbations in standard 4D cosmological models. Carefully com- parison of the spectrum of extremal values of the first and second order
- dependency and the distribution of the alignment of the quasar polarizations is necessary. This can be accomplished when more observational data become available.
Keywords:
Quasar Polarization, Cosmic Strings, Warped Brane World Models, U(1) Scalar-Gauge Field, Multiple-Scale Analysis

1. Introduction
General relativity theory (GRT) is by far the most successful theory constructed by theoretical physicists. Its predictive power is impressive. Famous empirical confirmed examples are the Kerr black hole and the emission of gravitational waves by merging black holes. There are, however, predicted phenomena not yet detected by observations. An example is the axially symmetric (spinning) com- pact object, i.e., the Papapetrou or Lewis-van Stockum solution. Another well studied object is the self-gravitating cosmic string solution. For an overview, see the work of Vilenkin and Shellard [1] and Anderson [2] . Cosmic strings are U(1) scalar gauge vortex solutions in general relativity in the framework of GUT’s. This U(1) scalar gauge field with a “Mexican hat” potential has lived up its reputation in the theory of superconductivity, where vortex lines occur as topological defects and in the standard model of particle physics. In cosmology it could trigger the inflationary period of expansion and could solve the horizon and flatness problem. It came as a surprise that the relativistic string-like vortex solution of Nielsen and Olesen [3] can be found in GRT [4] [5] . However, general relativistic cosmic string is still not found directly or indirectly by observations. The interest in cosmic strings faded away when one found in- consistencies with the power spectrum of the CMB: Cosmic strings cannot provide satisfactory explanation for the magnitude of the initial density pertur- bations from which galaxies and clusters grew. It turns out that the upper bound of the mass per unit length
. Further, the special pattern of a lensing effect of cosmic strings is not found yet. Studies of the radiative effects of cosmic strings embedded in a FLRW spacetime show that cylindrical gravitational radiation is rapidly damped and is negligible in any physical regime [6] . These string-cosmology spacetimes essentially look like a scaled version of a string in a vacuum spacetime. There is, however, another possibility to test the existence of cosmic strings. The recently discovered alignment of quasar polarizations on very large scales [7] [8] could be explained by considering cosmic strings on a warped brane world spacetime [9] [10] . It was realized recently that cosmic strings could be produced within the framework of superstring theory inspired cosmological models and a revival of cosmic strings occurred. These so-called cosmic superstrings can play the role of cosmic strings in the framework of string theory or M-theory, i.e., brane world models. Supersymmetric GUT’s can even demand the existence of cosmic strings. Super-massive strings with an energy density of
are interesting [11] because their gravitational impact will be much stronger than GUT strings. They could be produced when the universe underwent phase transitions at energies much higher than the GUT scale. Brane world cosmological models were first proposed by Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos and Dvali (ADD) [12] [13] and Antoniadis et al. [14] and extended by Randall and Sundrum (RS) [15] [16] . In these models, the extra dimension can be very large compared to the ones predicted in string theory, i.e., of order of millimeters. The difference with the standard superstring model is that the compactification rely on the curvature of the bulk. The huge discrepancy between the electro-weak scale,
and the gravitational mass scale,
(hierarchy problem) will be suppressed by the volume of the extra dimension, or the curvature in that region. This effect can also be achieved in the RS models by a warp factor. The weakness of gravity in these models are fundamental and the Planck energy could be of
that may be accessible by LHC. It is possible that effective 4D Kaluza-Klein (KK)-modes are obtained from the perturbative 5D graviton. These KK-modes will be massive from the brane viewpoint. Further, one usually considers a fine-tuning between the tension on the brane (4D cosmological constant) and the 5D tension in order to ensure a zero effective cosmological constant. For an overview of brane world models, see, for example, Roy [17] [18] [19] and Shiromizu et al. [20] and references therein. Cosmic strings could have tremendous mass in the bulk, while their warped manifestations in the brane show consistency with the observed bound of
by the warp factor [21] , even if its value was at the Planck scale. Wavelike disturbances triggered by the huge mass of the cosmic string in the bulk, could have indeed observational effects in the brane. Evidence of these objects would give us information at very high energies in the early stages of the universe. Maybe they might actually provide us the best observa- tional window upon fundamental string theory. One reason for this conjecture is the possibility of the extension of fundamental strings into the bulk in warped spacetimes.
In this research we extend our previous work on the relation of the alignment of quasar polarizations with warped cosmic strings [10] . Recent research in this field [22] shows peculiar correlation of quasar polarization orientations in LQGs. The alignments can be parallel or perpendicular to each other. Ever other discretizations are not excluded. We shall see that this behaviour fits in our brane world model. However, there are some peculiar issues to be addressed. A network of long cosmic strings can be characterised by a single scaling length, the persistence length of the inter-string distance. Numerical simulations have shown that the evolution of the network must be scale-invariant. It is a great challenge to prove that there is a comparable scale-invariance in the alignments of the polarization vectors of quasars. By the discovery of high-redshift super- massive black holes,
, one could extend the investigation on quasar alignment to this era. There is already a tiny indication of z-dependency in the observed quasar polarization orientations [7] . Further, the formation of small- scale closed loops of cosmic strings can disturb the energy balance of long strings. In our model this problem is overcome by the warp factor: it makes the cosmic string more massive during the evolution.
In Section 2 we outline the multiple-scale method on a warped brane world spacetime. In Section 3 we calculate the metric perturbations to second order. In Section 4 we derive the matter field equations to second order and indicate the possible relation with axially symmetric instabilities caused by radiation- reactions. In Section 5 we discuss the possible connection of the warp factor with conformal invariance. In the appendices we collected all the relevant equations in order to keep the main text readable and self-contained.
2. The Multiple-Scale Approximation on a Warped Brane World Spacetime
We will investigate vortex-like solution on a warped five-dimensional Fried- mann-Lematre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) model in cylindrical coordinates [9] [10] :
(1)
with
a warpfactor dependent of
and the bulk dimension y. The self- gravitating scalar-gauge field, parameterized as
(2)
resides on the brane.
is the vacuum expectation value of the scalar field, n the winding number and
the gauge coupling constant. The winding number (number of jumps in phase of the scalar field when one goes around the flux tube) is related to the quantized flux in the Ginsberg Landau theory of super- conductivity (Abrikosov vortices) and the discrete values of the topological charge in the sin-Gordon theory. The exact solution of 

with




with 





with 




Here we will consider the modified cosmic string features on the warped spacetime Equation (1) and use the multiple-scale approximation [23] [24] [25] in order to find partial differential equations (PDE’s) for the perturbations to second order of the metric and matter fields. This extends our previous research [10] .
Let us expand the metric field and the scalar-gauge fields in the multiple-scale scheme

with 








perturbations occur in the direction of the wave vector

Substituting the expansions into the effective Einstein and matter field equations, one obtains a set of PDE’s for 



The Einstein equations in subsequent orders of approximation become



We will consider here the equations up to order


must be calculated with the 5D Riemann tensor. If we consider


condition”



3. The Metric Perturbations up to Second Order
The PDE’s for the background fields 



with 












Let us now investigate the higher order equations in




moment 

We observe in Equation (33) again a 














We shall see in the next sections how this result can be applied in context with the recently observed alignment of the polarization vectors of quasars over large distances and the discreteness in the azimuthal dependency of the polarization axes.
4. The Matter Field Equations and the Energy-Momentum Tensor Expansion
From Equation (4) we obtain, after substituting the expansions of Equation (6), from the 






where we have integrated the equation with respect to














We can obtain, as in the case of the second order metric components, again second order PDE’s for 







where 





The second order equation for 
We can calculate the three first terms of the energy momentum tensor













The most interesting behavior arises in the angular component












There is a relation between the phase freedom 







5. Quasar Polarization Alignment and Scale-Invariance
In order to explain the recently found large-scale alignments of the polarization vectors of quasars in LQGs at cosmological redshifts 
Gravity theory invariant under 

where we renamed the warp factor as



we then obtain for the Ricci scalar

The Ricci scalar transforms under 

So for conformal invariancy of


with constraint equations


with





6. Conclusions
It is found on a five dimensional warped brane world spacetime, using a multiple-scale approximation scheme, that to second order the metric and scalar gauge field show a spectrum of azimuthal-angle dependent wavelike modes with extremal values dependent of the winding numbers of the background, first and second order perturbations of the scalar field.
In four dimensional models, this local field theory admits vortex-like behavior and is a generalization of the Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductivity. A lattice of Abrikosov vortices can be formed, carrying a quantized flux dependent of the winding number or “vortex charge”

The jump in the phase of the scalar field is related to the secular instability of the initially stationary axially symmetric configuration caused by the radiation reaction. The breaking of the axially symmetry, described by the inverse of the angular momentum, is 

There is a strong evidence of scaling (conformal) behaviour of long non- intercommuting cosmic strings networks during the radiation-dominated era. High or low initial string densities tend toward a fixed scaling value. However, standard cosmology, constraints such strings to be very light and will fade away (or disappear by the forming of closed loops). In our model they can survive by the warp factor. This fact makes the comparison with the alignment of quasars possible. So it would be desirable to have also a scale-invariant alignment structure. This is currently under study.
Cite this paper
Slagter, R.J. (2017) Alignment of Quasar Polarizations on Large Scales Explained by Warped Cosmic Strings. PART II: The Second Order Contribution. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 163-180. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.82015
References
- 1. Vilenkin, A. and Shellard, E.P.S. (1994) Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, UK.
- 2. Anderson, M.R. (2003) The Mathematical Theory of Cosmic Strings. IoP Publishing, Bistol.
https://doi.org/10.1887/0750301600 - 3. Nielsen, H.B. and Olesen, P. (1973) Nuclear Physics B, 61, 45.
- 4. Garfinkle, D. (1985) Physical Review D, 32, 1323.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.32.1323 - 5. Laguna-Castilo, P. and Matzner, R.A. (1987) Physical Review D, 36, 3663.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.36.3663 - 6. Gregory, R. (1989) Physical Review D, 39, 2108.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2108 - 7. Hutsemekers, D., Braibant, L., Pelgrims, V. and Sluse, D. (2014) Astronomy & Astrophysics, 572, A18.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424631 - 8. Taylor, A.R. and Jagannathan, P. (2016) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 459, L36.
- 9. Slagter, R.J. and Pan, S. (2016) Foundations of Physics, 46, 1075.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0002-2 - 10. Slagter, R.J. (2016) Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 501.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.76052 - 11. Laguna-Castillo, P. and Garfinkle, D. (1989) Physical Review D, 40, 1011-1016.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.40.1011 - 12. Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S. and Dvali, G. (1992) Physics Letters B, 429, 263-272.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00466-3 - 13. Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S. and Dvali, G. (1999) Physical Review D, 59, Article ID: 086004.
- 14. Antoniadis, I., Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S. and Dvali, G. (1998) Physics Letters B, 436, 257-263.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00860-0 - 15. Randall, L. and Sundrum, R. (1999) Physical Review Letters, 83, 3370-3373.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 - 16. Randall, L. and Sundrum, R. (1999) Physical Review Letters, 83, 4690-4693.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 - 17. Maartens, R. (2007) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 68, Article ID: 012046.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/68/1/012046 - 18. Maartens, R. (2007) Lecture Notes in Physics, 720, 323-332.
- 19. Maartens, R. and Koyama, K. (2010) Living Reviews in Relativity, 13, 5.
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2010-5 - 20. Shiromizu, T., Maeda, K. and Sasaki, M. (2000) Physical Review D, 62, Article ID: 024012.
- 21. Slagter, R.J. (2014) International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10, 1237.
- 22. Pelgrims, V. (2016) ArXiv:astro-ph/160405141v1.
- 23. Choquet-Bruhat, Y. (1969) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 12, 16-35.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646432 - 24. Choquet-Bruhat, Y. (1977) General Relativity and Gravitation, 8, 561-571.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756307 - 25. Slagter, R.J. (1986) Astrophysical Journal, 307, 20-29.
https://doi.org/10.1086/164388 - 26. Bogomol’nyi, E. (1976) Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, 24, 449-454.
- 27. Felsager, B. (1987) Geometry, Particles and Fields. Odense University Press, Odense.
- 28. Chandrasekhar, S. and Lebovitz, N.R. (1973) Astrophysical Journal, 185, 19-30.
https://doi.org/10.1086/152393 - 29. ‘T Hooft, G. (2014) ArXiv: gr-qc/14106675v3.
- 30. ‘T Hooft, G. (2015) ArXiv: gr-qc/151104427v1.
- 31. Wald, R.W. (1984) General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 - 32. Maldacena, J. (2011) ArXiv: gr-qc/11055632v2.
Appendix
A. The Background and First Order Perturbation Equations
In an earlier work [10] we obtained the equations for the background metric components (











The background matter fields (


and perturbation equations



These background equations don’t contain perturbations terms, due to our (simplified) gauge conditions.
B. The Second Order Perturbation Equations
With the help of a algebraic manipulation program, we obtain from Equation (10), for example, the most interesting:

and

with 





There are the second order partial derivative terms 

C. The Energy Momentum Components
For the several orders of the energy-momentum tensor components we find










Submit or recommend next manuscript to SCIRP and we will provide best service for you:
Accepting pre-submission inquiries through Email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.
A wide selection of journals (inclusive of 9 subjects, more than 200 journals)
Providing 24-hour high-quality service
User-friendly online submission system
Fair and swift peer-review system
Efficient typesetting and proofreading procedure
Display of the result of downloads and visits, as well as the number of cited articles
Maximum dissemination of your research work
Submit your manuscript at: http://papersubmission.scirp.org/
Or contact jmp@scirp.org




