The Equitable Total Chromatic Number of Some
Join graphs
MA Gang
College of Mathematics and Computer Science
Northwest University for Nationalities
Lanzhou, Gansu, China 730030
Email: jsmg@xbmu.edu.cn
Telephone:13909408935
MA Ming
College of Mathematics and Computer Science
Northwest University for Nationalities
Lanzhou, Gansu, China 730030
Email: jsmm@xbmu.edu.cn
Telephone:13669389252
Abstract—A proper total-coloring of graph Gis said to be
equitable if the number of elements (vertices and edges) in any
two color classes differ by at most one, which the required
minimum number of colors is called the equitable total chromatic
number.In this paper,we prove some theorems on equitable
total coloringand derive the equitabletotal chromatic numbers
of PmSn,PmFnand PmWn.
Keywords-join graph; equitable total coloring; equitable
total chromatic numbers
I. INTRODUCTION
The coloring problem is one of the most important problems
in the graph theory. As an extension of proper vertex coloring,
edge coloring and total coloring[15], the concept and some
conjectures on the equitable total coloring[68] is developed.
It is averydifficultproblem to obtainthe equitable total
chromatic number, which meaningful results are rare.
The adjacent vertex distinguishing-equitable total chromatic
numbers ofsomedoublegraphsare researchinreferences
[9]. Zhang et al.(2008) introduced the vertex distinguishing
equitable edge coloring in references [10], and the vertex
distinguishing equitableedge chromaticnumbers ofthe join-
graphs between path and path, path and cycle, cycle and cycle
with equivalent order are obtained in references [11].
In this paper, we study the equitable total coloring of some
join graphsand getsome results.Some termsand marksaren’t
described in this paper, please refer them to [1-3].
II. DEFINITION AND LEMMA
Definition 2.1[2] Forasimple graphG(V,E), letfbea
proper k-edge coloring of G, and
||Ei|−|Ej||≤1,i,j=1,2,··· ,k.
The partition {Ei|1ik}is calleda k-equitable edge
coloring (k-PEEC of Gin brief), and
χ
e(G)=min{k|kPEEC of G}
is calledthe equitable edgechromatic number ofG, where
eEi,f(e)=i,i =1,2,··· ,k.
Definition 2.2[68] For a simple graph G(V,E), let fbe
a proper k-total coloring of G, and
||Ti|−|Tj||≤1,i,j=1,2,··· ,k.
The partition {Ti}={ViEi|1ik}is called a k-
equitable total coloring (k-ETC of Gin brief), and
χet(G)=min{k|kETC of G}
is called the equitable total chromatic number of G,where
xTi=ViEi,f(x)=i,i =1,2,··· ,k.
Conjecture2.1[68] For any simple graph G(V,E),
χet(G)Δ(G)+2 and χet(G)=χt(G),
where χt(G)is the total chromatic number of G.
Definition 2.3[2] For graph Gand H(V(G)V(H)=
φ, E(G)E(H)=φ), a new graph,denotedby GH,is
called the join of Gand Hif
V(GH)=V(G)V(H),
E(GH)=E(G)E(H)∪{uv|uV(G),v V(H)}.
Lemma 2.1[68] For any simple graph G(V,E),
χet(G)Δ(G)+1.
Lemma 2.2[2] For any simple graph G(V,E),
χ
e(G)Δ(G).
Foranysimple graph Gand H,χ
e(G)=χ(G)[6], andif
HG,then χ(H)χ(G)[1,2], whereχ(G)is theproper
edge chromaticnumberofG. SoLemma2.3and Lemma2.4
are obtained.
Lemma 2.3For any simple graphGand H,ifHis a
subgraph of G, then
χ
e(H)χ
e(G).
Lemma 2.4For complete graph Kpwith order p,
χ
e(Kp)=p,p 1(mod 2),
p1,p0(mod 2).
Lemma 2.5[2,5] Let Gbe a simple graph, if G[VΔ]does
not contain cycle, then
χ
e(G)=Δ(G).
Where V(G[VΔ]) = VΔ={v|d(v)=Δ(G),v
V(G)},E(G[VΔ]) = {uv|u, vVΔ,uvE(G)}.
Open Journal of Applied Sciences
Supplement2012 world Congress on Engineering and Technology
96 Cop
y
ri
g
ht © 2012 SciRes.
Lemma 2.6[68] For complete graph Kpwith order p,
χet(Kp)=p,p 1(mod 2),
p+1,p0(mod 2).
Lemma 2.7Suppose Pmis aPath withorder m,Sn,Fn
and WnareStar,Fanand Wheelwithorder n+1,respectively.
Then
Δ(PmSn)=Δ(PmFn)=Δ(PmWn)=m+n.
III. MAIN RESULTS
Forsomesimple graphs,we obtain Theorem3.1and The-
orem 3.2 as following.
Theorem 3.1Let Gbea simple graph, ifΔ(G)=|V(G)|
1and Gonly has a vertex with maximum degree, then
χet(G)=Δ(G)+1.
Proof By Lemma2.1, we only prove that Ghas an fof
(Δ(G)+1)-ETC.Suppose w∈ V(G),G=G∨{w},then
G[VΔ]=P2,soχ
e(G)=Δ(G)=Δ(G)+1byLemma
2.5.
Let fbe a (Δ(G)+1)-PEEC of G,
uV(G),f(u)=f(wu);
uv E(G),f(uv)=f(uv).
Obviously,fisa(Δ(G)+1)-ETC ofG, sotheTheorem 3.1
is true.
Theorem 3.2Let Gbea simple graph, if Δ(G)=|V(G)|
1and |V(G)|≡ 1(mod 2), then
χet(G)=Δ(G)+1.
ProofBy Lemma 2.1, we only prove that Ghas an fof n-
ETC, where n=|V(G)|.Suppose w∈ V(G),G=G∨{w},
obviouslyΔ(G)=n,GKn+1 and (n+1)0(mod2),
so χ
e(G)=nby Lemma 2.2, Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4.
Let fbe an n-PEEC of G,
uV(G),f(u)=f(wu);
uv E(G),f(uv)=f(uv).
Obviously,fis an n-ETC of G, so the Theorem 3.2 is true.
In the following discussion, let
Pm=u1u2···um;
V(Sn)={vi|i=0,1,2,··· ,n},E(Sn)={v0vi|i=
1,2,··· ,n};
V(Fn)={vi|i=0,1,2,··· ,n},E(Fn)={v0vi|i=
1,2,··· ,n}∪{vivi+1 |i=1,2,··· ,n1};
V(Wn)={vi|i=0,1,2,··· ,n},E(Wn)={v0vi|i=
1,2,··· ,n}∪{vivi+1 |i=1,2,··· ,n1}∪{vnv1}.
Theorem3.3When m2, then
χet(PmSn)=5,m=2,n=1,
m+n+1,otherwise.
ProofThere are seven cases to be considered.
Case 1When m=2and n=1, obviously P2S1=K4.
By Lemma 2.6, it’s clear that the result is true.
Case 2Whenm=3,n=1or m=n=2,χet(P3S1)=
χet(P2S2)=5by Lemma 2.7 and Theorem 3.2, so clearly
the result is true.
Case 3When m=2and n=3,χet (P3S3)6
by Lemma2.1 and Lemma2.7.Weonly need toprovethat
P2S3has an fof 6-ETC. Define fby
f(v0v1)=f(v2u1)=f(u2)=1;
f(v0v2)=f(v3u2)=f(u1)=2;
f(v1u2)=f(v3u1)=f(v0)=3;
f(v0u1)=f(v2u2)=f(v3)=4;
f(v0u2)=f(v1u1)=f(v2)=5;
f(v0v3)=f(u1u2)=f(v1)=6.
Obviously,thefis a6-ETC of P2S3, so theresult is true.
Case 4When m=2and n4,χet(P2Sn)n+3by
Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.7. We only need to prove that P2
Snhas an fof (n+3)-ETC. Let matching M={v0v1,u
1u2}.
Suppose w/V(P2Sn), denote Gby
V(G)=V(P2Sn)∪{w},
E(G)=E(P2Sn\M)∪{wu1,wu
2}∪{wvi|i=
0,1,··· ,n2}.
Hence G[VΔ]=u1v0u2isaPath withorder3, so χ
e(G)=
Δ(G)=n+2 by Lemma 2.5.
Let f1be an (n+2)-PEEC of G, let f2be a mapping of
P2Snbased on f1, that is,
f2(ui)=f1(wui),i=1,2;
f2(vi)=f1(wvi),i=0,1,··· ,n2.
Define mapping f3by
f3(v0v1)=f3(u1u2)=f3(un1)=f3(un)=n+3.
Put f=f1f2f3. So, for P2Sn,we
i∈{1,2,··· ,n+3},|Ti|=3or 4.
Obviously, fis an (n+3)-ETCof P2Sn, hence the result
is true.
Case 5Whenm4andn=1,χet(PmS1)m+2by
Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.7. We only need to prove that Pm
S1hasanfof (m+2)-ETC. Let matchingM={v0v1,u
2u3}.
Suppose w/V(PmS1), denote Gby
V(G)=V(PmS1)∪{w},
E(G)=E(PmS1\M)∪{wv0,wv
1}∪{wui|i=
2,3,··· ,m}.
Hence G[VΔ]=v0wv1is a Pathwith order 3,so χ
e(G)=
Δ(G)=m+1 by Lemma 2.5.
Let f1be an (m+1)-PEEC ofG,let f2beamapping of
PmS1based on f1, that is,
f2(vi)=f1(wvi),i=0,1;
f2(ui)=f1(wui),i=2,3,··· ,m.
Define mapping f3by
f3(v0v1)=f3(u2u3)=f3(u1)=m+2.
Put f=f1f2f3. So, for PmS1,wehave
i∈{1,2,··· ,m+2},|Ti|=3,m=4,
3or4,m5.
Obviously, fis an (m+2)-ETC of PmS1, hencetheresult
is true.
Case 6When m=3and n2,χet(P3Sn)n+4by
Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.7. We only need to prove that P3
Cop
y
ri
g
ht © 2012 SciRes.97
Snhasanfof(n+4)-ETC. Letmatching M={v0v1,v
2u2}.
Suppose w/V(P3Sn), denote Gby
V(G)=V(P3Sn)∪{w},
E(G)=E(P3Sn\M)∪{wu2}∪{wvi|i=
0,1,··· ,n}.
Hence G[VΔ]=v0u2is a Path with order 2,so χ
e(G)=
Δ(G)=n+3 by Lemma 2.5.
Let f1be an (n+3)-PEEC of G, let f2be a mapping of
P3Snbased on f1, that is,
f2(u2)=f1(wu2);
f2(vi)=f1(wvi),i=0,1,··· ,n.
Define mapping f3by
f3(v0v1)=f3(v2u2)=f3(u1)=f3(u3)=n+4.
Put f=f1f2f3. So, for P3Sn,wehave
i∈{1,2,··· ,n+4},|Ti|=
3or4,2n6,
4,n=7,
4or5,n8.
Obviously, fis an (n+4)-ETCof P3Sn, hence the result
is true.
Case 7When m4and n2,PmSnonly has avertex
v0with maximumdegreeand d(v0)=m+n=|V(PmSn)|
1, so clearly the result is true by Theorem 3.1.
From what stated above, the proof is completed.
Theorem3.4When m2and n2, then
χet(PmFn)=7,m=2,n=3orm=3,n=2,
m+n+1,otherwise.
ProofSincePmFn
=PnFm, soweonly prove that
the result is true when mn2. There are six cases to be
considered.
Case 1When m=n=2, obviously P2F2=K5.By
Lemma 2.6, it’s clear that the result is true.
Case 2When m=3and n=2,χet(P3F2)6by
Lemma 2.1andLemma2.7, obviously P3F2=K6u1u3.
Suppose χet(K6u1u3)=6,onlythe color contains atmost
4 elements which colored u1and u3, each color of the left
contains 3elements,so6colorscolored atmost19elements,
but |V(K6u1u3)|+|E(K6u1u3)|=20.Hence,6-
ETC isimpossible.Moreover, 7-ETCof P3F2is getatable,
denote fby
f(uivj)=i+j,i =1,2,3,j=0,1,2;
f(u1u2)=f(v1)=5; f(u3)=2; f(v0)=4;
f(u2u3)=f(v0v1)=f(v2)=6;
f(v0v2)=f(u1)=7; f(v1v2)=f(u2)=1.
Obviously, fis a 7-ETC of P3F2, hencethe result is true.
Case 3Whenm4and n=2,χet(PmF2)m+3
by Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.7. We only prove that PmF2
has anfof(m+3)-ETC.Let matching M={v0u2,v
1v2}.
Suppose w/V(PmF2), denote Gby
V(G)=V(PmF2)∪{w},
E(G)=E(PmF2\M)∪{wv0,wv
1,wv
2,wu
2}∪
{wui|i=4,5,··· ,m}.
Hence G[VΔ]=v1v0v2is a Path with order 3,so χ
e(G)=
Δ(G)=m+2 by Lemma 2.5.
Let f1be an (m+2)-PEEC ofG,let f2beamapping of
PmF2based on f1, that is,
f2(vi)=f1(wvi),i=0,1,2; f2(u2)=f1(wu2);
f2(ui)=f1(wui),i=4,5,··· ,m.
Define mapping f3by
f3(v1v2)=f3(v0u2)=f3(u1)=f3(u3)=m+3.
Put f=f1f2f3. So, for PmF2,wehave
i∈{1,2,··· ,m+3},|Ti|=
3or 4,m=4,5,6,
4,m=7,
4or 5,m8.
Obviously, fis an (m+3)-ETC of PmF2, hence the result
is true.
Case 4When m=n=3,χet(P3F3)=7 by Lemma
2.7 and Theorem 3.2, so clearly the result is true.
Case 5When m>n=3,χet(PmF3)m+4 by
Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.7. We only prove that PmF3has
an fof(m+4)-ETC. LetmatchingM={v1u2,v
0v2,v
3u3}.
Suppose w/V(PmF3), denote Gby
V(G)=V(PmF3)∪{w},
E(G)=E(PmF3\M)∪{wu |uV(Pm
F3),and u=u1,u
m}.
Hence G[VΔ]=v0v2isa Pathwith order2,so χ
e(G)=
Δ(G)=m+3 by Lemma 2.5.
Let f1be an (m+3)-PEEC ofG,let f2beamapping of
PmF3based on f1, that is,
f2(u)=f1(wu),uV(PmF3),and u=u1,u
m.
Define mapping f3by
f3(v1u2)=f3(v0v2)=f3(v3u3)=f3(u1)=f3(um)=
m+4.
Put f=f1f2f3. So, for PmF3,wehave
i∈{1,2,··· ,m+4},|Ti|=
4,m=4,
4or 5,5m11,
5,m=12,
5or 6,m13.
Obviously, fis an (m+4)-ETC of PmF3, hence the result
is true.
Case 6When mn4,PmFnonly has a vertex v0
with maximumdegree andd(v0)=m+n=|V(PmFn)|
1, so clearly the result is true by Theorem 3.1.
From what stated above, the proof is completed.
Theorem3.5When m2and n3, then
χet(PmWn)=7,m=2,n=3,
m+n+1,otherwise.
ProofThere are six cases to be considered.
Case 1Whenm=2and n=3,obviously P2W3=K6.
By Lemma 2.6, it’s clear that the result is true.
Case 2When m=2,n =4or m=n=3,χet(P2
W4)=χet(P3W3)=7by Lemma 2.7 and Theorem3.2,
so clearly the result is true.
Case 3When m=2and n5,χet(P2Wn)n+3
by Lemma 2.1and Lemma 2.7. We only prove thatP2Wn
has an fof (n+3)-ETC. Define fby
f(viuj)=i+j,i =0,1,··· ,n,j =1,2;
98 Cop
y
ri
g
ht © 2012 SciRes.
f(v0vi)=i+3,i=1,2,··· ,n;f(v0)=3;
f(u1u2)=f(v1)=f(v3)=n+3;f(v1v2)=n+1;
f(v2v3)=f(u1)=n+2; f(v2)=2;
f(vivi+1)=i2,i=3,4,··· ,n1;
f(vmv1)=f(u2)=1;f(vi)=i,i =4,5,··· ,n.
We have
i∈{1,2,··· ,m+3},|Ti|=
3or 4,n=5,
4,n=6,
4or 5,n7.
Obviously, the fisan(n+3)-ETC of P2Wn, hencethe
result is true.
Case 4When m=3and n4,χet(P3Wn)n+4by
Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.7. We only prove that P3Wnhas
an fof (n+4)-ETC.Let matchingM={v0u2,v
1v2,v
3v4}.
Suppose w/V(P3Wn), denote Gby
V(G)=V(P3Wn)∪{w},
E(G)=E(P3Wn\M)∪{wu2}∪{wvi|i=
0,1,··· ,n}.
Hence theedge set ofG[VΔ]isempty, soχ
e(G)=
Δ(G)=n+3 by Lemma 2.5.
Let f1be an (n+3)-PEEC of G, let f2be a mapping of
P3Wnbased on f1, that is,
f2(u2)=f1(wu2);f2(vi)=f1(wvi),i=0,1,··· ,n.
Define mapping f3by
f3(v0u2)=f3(v1v2)=f3(v3v4)=f3(u1)=f3(u3)=
n+4.
Put f=f1f2f3. So, for P3Wn,wehave
i∈{1,2,··· ,n+4},|Ti|=
4or 5,4n10,
5,n=11,
5or 6,n12.
Obviously, fisan(n+4)-ETCofP3Wn,hence theresult
is true.
Case 5When m4andn=3,χet(PmW3)
m+4 byLemma 2.1and Lemma2.7. We onlyprove
that PmW3has an fof (m+4)-ETC.Let edge set
M={v0v1,v
2v3,u
2u3;v0v3,v
1v2,u
1u2}. Suppose w/
V(PmW3), denote Gby
V(G)=V(PmW3)∪{w},
E(G)=E(PmW3\M)∪{wvi|i=0,1,2,3}∪
{wu2}∪{wui|i=6,7,··· ,m, m6}.
Hence theedgeset of G[VΔ]is{v0v2,v
1v3},χ
e(G)=
Δ(G)=m+2 by Lemma 2.5.
Let f1be an (m+2)-PEEC ofG,let f2beamapping of
PmW3based on f1, that is,
f2(u2)=f1(wu2);f2(vi)=f1(wvi),i=0,1,2,3;
f2(ui)=f1(wui),i=6,7,··· ,m, (m6).
Define mapping f3by
f3(v0v1)=f3(v2v3)=f3(u2u3)=f3(u1)=f3(u4)=
m+3;
f3(v0v3)=f3(v1v2)=f3(u1u2)=f3(u3)=f3(u5)=
m+4,(only if m5,has it vertex u5).
Put f=f1f2f3. So, for PmW3,wehave
i∈{1,2,··· ,m+4},|Ti|=
4or 5,4m10,
5,m=11,
5or 6,m12.
Obviously, fis an(m+4)-ETC ofPmW3,hencethe result
is true.
Case 6Whenm4andn4,PmWnonly has
a vertex v0withmaximum degreeand d(v0)=m+n=|
V(PmWn)|−1, so clearly the result is true by Theorem
3.1.
From what stated above, the proof is completed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This paper supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China(61163037),the Fundamental Research
Funds for the Central Universities of Northwest University
for Nationalities(ZYZ2011082,ZYZ2011077).
Corresponding author:MA Ming,CollegeofMath-
ematics and Computer Science, Northwest University for
Nationalities, Lanzhou, Gansu, China 730030, Email:
jsmm@xbmu.edu.cn
REFERENCES
[1]H. P. Yap,Total Colorings of Graphs, Berlin: Lecture Notes in Mathe-
matics, 1623, Springer, 1996.
[2]J.A.Bondy,U. S. R.Murty, GraphTheorywith Applications,New York:
The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1976.
[3]Tian Feng, MAZhong-fan,Graph Theoryand NetworkFlow Theory,
Beijin: Science Press, 1987.
[4]Zhang Zhong-fu, Wang Jian-fang, The Progress ofTotal-Colouringof
Graphs, Advances in Mathematics, 1992,21(4):390-397.
[5]Zhang Zhong-fu,Zhang Jian-xun, OnSome SufficientConditions of First
Kind Graph, Journal of Mathematics, 1985,5(2):161-165.
[6]Ma Gang,Zhang Zhong-fu, Onthe Equitable Total Coloring of Mul-
tiple Join-graph,JournalofMathematicalResearchandExposition,
2007,27(2):351-354.
[7] Wang Wei-fan, Equitable Total Coloringof Graphs with Maximum
Degree 3, Graphs and Combin, 2002,18:677-685.
[8]Ma Gang, Zhang Zhong-fu, Qiang Hui-ying, Onequitable total chro-
matic numberof CmFn,Journalof Lanzhou JiaotongUniversity,
2005,24(4):147-149.
[9]Ma Gang, Zhang Zhong-fu, on Adjacent Vertex-distinguishing-equitable
TotalColoring of Double Graphs, J. of Jilin University (ScienceEdition),
2009, 47(6): 1160-1164.
[10]Zhang Zhong-fu,Li Mu-chun, Yao Bin, etal, On theVertex Distin-
guishing Equitable Edge-coloring of Graphs, ARS Combinatoria, 2008,
86: 193-200.
[11]Zhang Zhong-fu, Li Jing-wen, Zhao Chuan-cheng, et al, On the Vertex-
distinguishing-equitable Edge Chromatic of someJoin-graphs, Acta
Mathematica Sinica, Chinese Series, 2007, 50(1): 197-204.
Cop
y
ri
g
ht © 2012 SciRes.99