American Journal of Plant Sciences
Vol.5 No.1(2014), Article ID:42302,5 pages DOI:10.4236/ajps.2014.51026

Impact of Different Carbohydrates and Their Concentrations on in Vitro Regeneration of Solanum viarum (Dunal)—An Important Anticancer Medicinal Plant

Manikyam Doraiswamy Naidu Mahadev, Chandra Sekhar Panathula, ChallagundlaVaradarajulu Naidu*

Department of Biotechnology, Dravidian University, Kuppam, India.

Email: *challagundlav@yahoo.co.in

Copyright © 2014 Manikyam Doraiswamy Naidu Mahadev et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In accordance of the Creative Commons Attribution License all Copyrights © 2014 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Manikyam Doraiswamy Naidu Mahadev et al. All Copyright © 2014 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian.

Received November 29th, 2013; revised December 31st, 2013; accepted January 15th, 2014

KEYWORDS

Solanum viarum; Carbohydrates; Plant Regeneration; Multiple Shoot Induction

ABSTRACT

In this present study, the effect of various carbon sources such as sucrose, glucose, fructose and maltose was investigated on in vitro shoot regeneration of Solanum viarum using axillary bud explants. The frequency, growth and multiplication rate were highly influenced by the type and concentration of carbon source used. Among the different concentrations (1% - 6%) of carbohydrates studied, the maximum number of shoots (22.6 ± 0.50) and shoot length (5.92 ± 0.13 cm) was obtained on MS medium supplemented with 4% (w/v) fructose. The least number of shoots (1.5 ± 0.32) was obtained on 6% maltose and the least shoot length (1.2 ± 0.23) was observed on 6% glucose. Among the four types of carbon sources that were employed in the present study, fructose at 4% proved to be better choice for multiple shoot regeneration followed by sucrose, glucose and maltose from axillary bud explants of S. viarum.

1. Introduction

Solanum viarum (Dunal) is a much branched, prickly shrub one to two meters tall at maturity. It is a member of economically important family Solanaceae. This plant grown in India as a richest source of steroids [1], which yields an economically important source of glycoalkaloide solasodine which is present in the fruit is a precursor for the steroid disogenin [2]. This is used in the synthesis of steroid hormone for treating cancer, addison’s disease, rheumatic arthritis and for providing contraceptives [3]. This glycoalkaloid solasodine is a nitrogen analogue of disogenine. Solasodine though 16-Dihydropregnenolone (16-DPA) is converted to group of compounds like testosterone, methyl testosterone and corticosteroids like predinisolene and hydrocortisone. This steroid compounds have anti-inflammatory, anabolic and antifertility properties [4]. Considering its high economical and pharmacological importance of secondary metabolites industries are deeply interested in utilizing the plant tissue culture technology for large scale production of these substances [5]. In general sucrose is the carbohydrate of choice as a carbon source for in vitro plant cultures because it is the most common carbohydrate in phloem sap of many plants [6]. Sucrose was proved to be the best choice as carbon source in previous reports on Mentha piperita, Stevia rebaudiana and Solanum nigrum [7-9]. However, invertases that are released by the explants into the medium split sucrose into glucose and fructose [10]. Thus the explants are usually exposed to a mixture of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Therefore, the aim of present study was to determine the effect of different carbon sources such as sucrose, glucose, fructose and maltose on in vitro shoot regeneration from seed germinated axillary bud explants of S. viarum.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Surface Sterilization

Seeds were collected from ripen and dried fruits of healthy plants of S. viarum (D.) that are cultured in the herbal garden, Dravidian University, Kuppam, A. P., India. Matured seeds were first washed under running tap water for 30 minutes to remove any adherent fruit tissue and dried juice which might serve as an agent for fungal contamination. Then the seeds were thoroughly washed with bavistin 0.4% (w/v) a fungicide under sterile conditions for an hour and rinsed thrice with sterile distilled water. This was followed by surface sterilization with 5% Tween-20 (v/v) for 15 minutes and the seeds were sterilized in 70% alcohol (v/v) for 2 minutes. Then the seeds were washed with 0.1% HgCl2 (w/v) for 2 minutes. Finally the seeds were washed thrice with sterile distilled water to remove the traces of HgCl2. The seeds were inoculated on MS medium [11] containing 0.8% (w/v) agar supplemented with various concentrations of cytokinins (BAP and Kinetin) and auxins (NAA, IAA and IBA) prior to autoclave, the medium was adjusted to the PH of 5.8 and sterilized for 20 minutes at 121˚C for 15 lbs pressure. The primary shoots formed in vitro were separated aseptically and cultured on MS medium supplemented with BAP (2.0 mg/l). Axillary buds were excised from the regenerated shoots were used as explants as a prerequisite for further experiments.

2.2. Culture Medium and Culture Conditions

Young nodal explants (1.0 - 2.0 cm) from in vitro seed germinated of four week old S. viarum were inoculated on MS medium supplemented with different carbon sources such as sucrose, glucose, fructose and maltose separately at (1% - 6%) and gelled with 0.8% (w/v) agar supplemented with cytokinin BAP at (2.0 mg/l). The culture room conditions maintained for in vitro cultures were 26˚C ± 2˚C and 60 to 70% relative humidity. Light intensity was 3000 lux with a photoperiod of 18 hours day light and 6 hours in dark. After sufficient elongation and multiplication of regenerated shoots, the micro shoots were carefully excised and rooted on half strength MS medium with NAA, IAA and IBA (0.5 - 2.0 mg/l) separately. The rooted plantlets were then transferred to polycups containing sterile soil and vermiculate (1:1) subsequently the plantlets were transferred to the green house after a month and planted in the soil.

2.3. Data Analysis

The variables such as shoot regeneration frequency, number of shoots per explant, shoot length, number of roots per shoot and root length were recorded.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted with a minimum of 20 explants. All assays were repeated at least three times. The experimental data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA using the DMRT (Duncan’s Multiple Range Test) (P < 0.05) and were presented as the average ± standard error (SE).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Different Carbon Sources on Regeneration of Shoots

Among the different carbohydrates used, fructose performed well followed by sucrose, glucose and maltose in terms of inducing multiple shoot number. The results are depicted in (Table 1) respectively. Fructose has been reported to be effective in preventing hyperhydricity and helps in production of adventitious shoots [12]. The maximum mean shoot number (22.6 ± 0.50) was recorded at 4% fructose, supplemented with MS medium (2.0 mg/l BAP) with maximum frequency of shoot regeneration (95%) Figure 1(a). Different types and concentration of carbon sources were used to study the effect on shoot multiplication from axillary bud explants of S. viarum. The growth and multiplication of shoots in vitro are affected by several factors, one of which is the concentration and kind of exogenous carbon source added to the medium [13]. For the growth of plant tissues the carbon source serves as the energy and osmotic agent [14] for various energy requiring processes that can occur at the expense of available metabolic substrates for the growth and root initiation [15].

The next best concentration for obtaining maximum mean shoot number was at 4% sucrose, with maximum number of shoots (12.6 ± 1.25) were recorded (Figure 1(b), Table 1). Sucrose has been proved to be better for shoot regeneration than other carbon sources in micropropagation of Linum usitatissimum [16]. Sucrose is the most common carbohydrate in the phloem sap of many plants. In contrast glucose was also better for inducing shoot proliferation in case of indica and japonica [17]. In our investigation next to sucrose maximum mean number of shoots (8.72 ± 0.75) was recorded at 4% glucose, and (4.15 ± 0.55) was observed at 4% maltose respectively (Figures 1(c) and (d)). Whereas at 3% maltose gave (3.55 ± 0.53) number of shoots only. But very least mean number of shoots (2.5 ± 0.25) was observed at 1% mal-

Table 1. Effect of different carbohydrate sources on multiple shoot regeneration from axillary bud explants of in vitro grown S. viarum supplemented with 2.0 mg/L BAP. Data represent treatment means ± SE followed by different letter(s) within column indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and DMRT test (P < 0.05).

tose. Maltose aids as both a carbon source and as an osmaticum, compared to sucrose there is a gentler rate of extracellular hydrolysis, it is taken up more gradually, and hydrolysed intracellularly more slowly.

In our study also the growth of S. viarum is greatly influenced by different carbon sources supplemented with in the growth medium. High frequency, maximum number of shoots was induced on fructose supplemented medium. These findings are consistent with the previous reports in Mulberry [18], where addition of fructose instead of sucrose in the medium increased the shoot number and also growth of the shoots. Several reports indicate that the carbohydrate source can influence the degree and type of differentiation and thus the efficiency of plant regeneration [19]. It is well established that carbohydrate requirements depend upon the stage of culture and may show difference according to the species [20]. Shoots induced on MS medium supplemented with 4% fructose resulted in maximum mean shoot length (5.92 ± 0.13 cm) when compared to the other carbon sources used. The least mean shoot length (1.21 ± 0.23 cm) was observed at MS medium supplemented with 6% glucose Table 1. Shoot length declines at higher concentration of glucose as carbon sources might be due to the embarrassment of organogenesis.

3.2. In Vitro Rooting

In this present study the shoot lets formed were excised and transferred on half strength MS media with IAA, IBA and NAA seperately of varied concentrations (0.5 - 2.0 mg/l) Table 2. IBA (1.0 mg/l) produced the maximum number of roots (18.3 ± 0.15) with root length (5.9 ± 0.16 cm). As IBA concentration increases the number of roots were decreased. These results are in line with Aegle marmelos [21]. The maximum regeneration frequency (100%) was observed with IBA (0.5 mg/l) (Figure 1(e)). Whereas the least number of roots (8.4 ± 0.23) with least root length (1.6 ± 0.32 cm) were noticed in IAA (2.0 mg/l). NAA (1.0 mg/l) was also gave the second highest number of roots (16.2 ± 0.31) with root length (4.8 ± 0.18 cm). The maximum root regeneration frequency (100%) was observed with IBA (0.5 mg/l).

3.3. Acclimatization and Hardening

After the development of plant lets with well developed roots (after 4 - 5 weeks) were successfully acclimatized and eventually established in green house. A mixture of sterile soil and vermiculate (1:1) ratio supported maximum percentage of survival. Gradual acclimatization was done with decreasing humid conditions and transition to the field condition (Figures 1(g) and (h)).

4. Conclusion

In the present study, growth of S. viarum is greatly influenced by different carbon sources supplemented in the

Figure 1. Effect of different carbon sources on multiple shoot regeneration on MS medium + BAP (2.0 mg/l) of S. viarum. (a) Multiple shoot formation from nodal explanton MS medium supplemented with fructose (4%); (b) Multiple shoot formation from nodal explanton MS medium supplemented with sucrose (4%); (c) Multiple shoot formation from nodal explanton MS medium supplemented with glucose (4%); (d) Multiple shoot formation from nodal explanton MS medium supplemented with maltose (4%); (e) Direct rooting of regenerated shoot lets on MS medium after 40 days of culture (IBA 0.5 mg/l); (f) Well rooted plants ready for hardening; (g) and (h) Tissue cultured plants in polycups and pots containing sterile soil andvermiculate. (1:1 ratio).

Table 2. Root organogenesis of in vitro derived shoot lets of S. viarum supplemented with various concentrations of IAA, NAA and IBA using half strength MS medium. Data represent treatment means ± SE followed by different letter(s) within column indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and DMRT test (P < 0.05).

media. It can be concluded that S. viarum cultures have quite selective carbohydrate requirements. Among the different carbon sources used, fructose performs well followed by sucrose, glucose and maltose in terms of multiple shoot induction. Our results could contribute to the improvement in the micropropagation of this economically important medicinal plant on commercial scale to meet the present day demand. However, further research is required to explore the possible growth promoting factors in these carbon sources.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the UGC BRS (Non-SAP) New Delhi, India for providing financial assistance in the form of fellowship.

REFERENCES

  1. J. J. Mullahey, M. Nee, R. P. Wunderlin and K. R. Delancey, “Tropical Soda Apple (Solanum viarum D.): A New Weed Threat in Subtropical Regions,” Weed Technology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1987, pp. 783-786.
  2. S. Budhavari, “The Merck Index,” 11th Edition, Merck & Co, Inc., Rahway, 1989.
  3. R. Srinivasan, N. S. Talekar and S. Uthamaswamy, “Feeding Stimulants in Solanum viarum Dunal for Fruit Borer,” Formosan Entomology, Vol. 25, 2005, pp. 95-102.
  4. D. H. Tejavathi and B. Bauvana, “Micropropagation of Solanum viarum Dunal through Cotyledonary Node, Shoottip and Nodal Cultures,” Journal of Phytology Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1996, pp. 101-105.
  5. M. Misawa, “Plant Tissue Culture—An Important Production of Useful Metabolites,” Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Services Bulletin, Rome, 1994.
  6. E. E. P. Lemos and D. A. Baker, “Shoot Regeneration in Response to Carbon Source on Inter Nodal Explants of Annona muricata (L.),” Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, Vol. 46, No. 9, 1998, pp. 3719-3720.
  7. P. Sujana and C. V. Naidu, “Impact of Different Carbohydrates on High Frequency Plant Regeneration from Axillary Buds of Mentha piperita (L.)—An Important Multipurpose Medicinal Plant,” Journal of Phytology, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2011, pp. 14-18.
  8. D. Preethi, T. M. sridhar and C. V. Naidu, “Carbohydrate Concentration Influences in Vitro Plant Regeneration in Stevia rebaudiana,” Journal of Phytology, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2011, pp. 61-64.
  9. T. M. sridhar and C. V. Naidu, “Effect of Different Carbon Sources on in Vitro Shoot Regeneration of Solanum nigrum (Linn)—An Important Antiulcer Medicinal Plant,” Journal of Phytology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2011, pp. 78-82.
  10. G. J. M. De Klerk and A. Calamar, “Effect of Sucrose on Adventitious Root Regeneration in Apple,” Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 70, No. 2, 2002, pp. 207- 212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016356123367
  11. T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassay with Tobacco Tissue Cultures,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1962, pp. 473- 497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  12. E. Rugini, P. Tarini and M. E. Rossodivita, “Control of Shoot Vitrification of Almond and Olive Grown in Vitro,” Acta Horticulturae, Vol. 212, 1987, pp. 177-183.
  13. Md. Anwar Hossian, Md. Tastin Hossain, Md. Raihanali and S. M. Mahbubur Rahman, “Effect of Different Carbon Sources on in Vitro Regeneration of Indian Pennywort (Centella asiatica L.),” Pakistan Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 7, 2005, pp. 963-965.
  14. H. Lipavska and H. Konradova, “Somatic Embryogenesis in Conifers: The Role of Carbohydrate Metabolism,” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2004, pp. 23-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/IVP2003482
  15. T. A. Thorpe, “Carbohydrate Utilization and Metabolism,” In: J. M. Bonga and D. J. Durzan. Eds., Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Inc., Hague, 1983, pp. 325-368.
  16. A. Cunha and F. Ferreira, “Influence of Medium Parameters on Somatic Embryogenesis from Hypocotyl Explants and Flux (Linum usitatissimum L.),” Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 155, No. 4-5, 1999, pp. 591-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80059-5
  17. R. K. Jain, G. S. Khehra, S. H. Lee, N. W. Blackhall, R. Marchant, M. R. Davey, J. B. Power, E. C. Cocking and S. S. Gosal, “An Improved Procedure for Plant Regeneration from Indica and Japonica Rice Protoplasts,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 14, No. 8, 1995, pp. 515-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00232786
  18. D. S. Vijayachitra and G. Padmaja, “Seasonal Influence on Axillary Bud Sprouting and Micropropagation of Elite Cultivars of Mulberry,” Scientia Horticulturae, Vol. 92, No. 1, 2001, pp. 55-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00279-5
  19. C. C. Cho, R. D. Hill and A. L. Brule-Bable, “High Frequency of Pollen Embryoids Formation and Plant Regeneration in Triticum aestivum L. on Monosaccharide Containing Media,” Plant Science, Vol. 66, 1990, pp. 225- 262.
  20. M. R. Thompson and T. A. Thorpe, “Metabolic and Non Metabolic Roles of Carbohydrates,” In: J. M. Bonga and D. J. Durzan, Eds., Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Inc., Netherlands, 1987, pp. 89-112.
  21. M. Hossain, M. R. Karim, R. Islam and O. I. Joarder, “Plant Regeneration from Nucellar Tissues of Aegle marmelos through Organogenesis,” Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1993, pp. 199-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00036102

NOTES

*Corresponding author.