Beijing Law Review, 2012, 3, 206-212 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/blr.2012.34026 Published Online December 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/blr) The Role of Global Civil Society in Global Govern an ce Vivek Kumar Mishra School of Law Justice & Governance, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, India. Email: mishrajnu@gmail.com, vivekm@gbu.ac.in Received July 13th, 2012; revised August 15th, 2012; accepted September 4th, 2012 ABSTRACT Globalisation is the most defining feature of the twenty first century. The globalised world faces new challenges such as climate change, terrorism, poverty and economic crisis. These challenges having no borders and cannot be solved by any country alone. These can be resolved only by coordinated efforts at the global level. Therefore, the world needs more effective forms of collaboration between international organisations, governments, the private sector and global civil society. The paper is an attempt to elucidate the role of global civil society as a means of global governance for the resolution of many global issues. More particularly, the aim is to understand how global civil society organisations are shaping the processes of global governance, and what their implications might be for the quality of governance at the international level. Keywords: Global Civil Society (GCS); Global Governance; International Non Governmental Organisations (INGO); Trans National Corporations ( T NC s) 1. Introduction The term “Globalisation” broadly means “the integration of economies and societies through cross country flows of information, goods, services, ideas, technologies, capital and people (Rangarajan [1])”. Roland Robertson, [2] refers it “as the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole”. Wallerstein [3] has aptly remarked that “globalisation is a driving force of the capitalist world economy”. Scholte [4] has stated it as “an ensemble of developments that make the world a single place, changing the meaning and importance of distance and national identity in world affairs”. Globalisation is broadly viewed as a contempo- rary process of increasing intense interconnectedness, interdependence and integration of economies across bor- ders and communities in different spheres of human life (Chaudhary, [5]). In the process of globalisation, interactions take place from the local and national to the supranational level. The encompassing changes in technological, cultural, political and especially economic domains can be cha- racterised as supranationalisation. The increasing supra- national character of many issues, i.e. terrorism, political Islam, public health, the environment, trade and invest- ment is giving the birth of new global problems (Good- hart, [6]). The supporters of globalisation especially hy- per globalist focuses on the inflow of foreign investment and higher economic growth, technological advances, shared knowledge, generation of new employment and, in turn, improving quality of life. On the contrary, the opponents strongly oppose globalisation and in particular of the “market fundamentalism.”1According to this view, globalisation is good for the rich, does little to help the poor and in fact is a major cause of inequality in the world. The sovereignty of the state depended on a territoriality geography where all social, economic, political and other transactions occur at or within a fixed location. With the end of territorialism and emergence of globalism, it is said that statism has lost its foundation because state is unable to control over financial capital, drug trafficking, terrorism and other global problems. The globalisation has enforced the “retreat of the state” and brought gover- nance into the hands of corporate powers and private markets that further their own personal interests at the expense of the poor (Yamini Aiyar, [7]). The role of glo- bal civil society has become important for analysing the asymmetric power relations and the undesirable cones- quences of globalisation. 2. Civil Society The idea of civil society is deeply rooted in the tradition of Western political thought. The term “civil society” can be traced through the works of Cicero and other Romans 1Market Fundamentalism is the belief, prominent during the conserva- tive ascendancy of the Reagan and Thatcher years tat free markets are always the best way to resolve economic problems. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. BLR
The Role of Global Civil Society in Global Governance 207 and Greek philosophers. In modern political philosophy it emerged along with the rise of capitalism and liberal political thought. In the eighteenth century, the notion of civil society was primarily understood as a political so- ciety by thinkers like Hobbes and Locke and used to de- scribe it as a “sphere of social activity” and distinguished from the state (Pietrzyk [8]). The concept of civil society has been defined by many scholars in various ways. Hobbes has defined it as “a creation and the application of force by the state to up- hold the con tract and so forth (Copleston, [9])”. In L o ck e ’s conception, civil society has two dimensions. On the first, it provides redress and security against anarchy and arbi- trariness of the “state of nature” and on the other, thro ugh the devolution of leg islative powers “in collective bodies of men, call them senate or parliament gives them secu- rity against the arbitrariness of the govern ment (Ajit Roy, [10])”. German philosopher Hegel embraces the civil society in the realm of economic interest, private property and in totality of the material conditions of life. While conce- ding the duality of political society (the state) and civil society (material conditions of life), he stressed that the concrete freedom consists in their identity (Marx, [10]). In his work Philosophy of Right Hegel equated civil so- ciety as a category clearly on a par with the family and the state (Hegel, [11]). In his organic perspective, he writes, “the state exists to protect common interests as it defines them by intervening in the activities of civil so- ciety (Hyden, [12])”. Hegel’s definition of civil society follows the classical economists view of the free market: “an association of members as self-subsistent individuals in a universality, which, because of their self-subsistence, is only abstract. Their association is brought about by their needs, by the legal system—the means to security of person and property—and by an external organization for attaining their particular and common interests (Hegel, [13])”. Marx viewed, society as a whole as a bourgeois society. Contrary to Hegel, Marx’ assumed that the state, which is an instrument of ruling class, will disapp ear with the dis- appearance of classes. “If for Hegel civil society should resolved into the ethical universal entity of the state, Marx resolves it into itself through the future negation of the existent distinction between civil society and the state and a future unity of human existence (Seligman, [14])”. Antonio Gramsci writings have created the new inter- est in civil society and its role and potentialities in con- temporary socio political life. According to Gramsci, “there are two major superstructural levels: the one that can be called civil society that is the ensemble of orga- nisms commonly called ‘private’ and that of political so- ciety or the state (Gramsci, [16])”. These two levels cor- respond on the one hand to the function of “hegemony” in which the dominant group exercises throughout society and on the other hand, of the direct domination or com- mand exercised through the state (Gramsci, [15]). He used this concept in his elaboration of politics vis-a-vis a number of distinct spheres, such as conception of hege- mony, war of position and war of manoeuvres, role of intellectuals and so on. The conceptual history of civil society provides a phi- losophical perspective, which is indispensable for the examination of the contemporary debate on civil society. The civil society exists “when people make combined ef- forts through voluntary associations to mould rules: both official, formal, legal arrangements and informal social constructs. In terms of membership, it encompasses enor- mous diversity. It includes academic institutions, busi- ness associations, development cooperation groups, envi- ronmental campaigns, farmer’s groups, human rights advo- cates, relief organisations, peace activists, professional bodies, women’s networks, youth campaigns and more (Scholte, [16])”. In terms of organisational forms, it in- cludes formally constitute d and officially regist ered groups as well as informal associations (Scholte, [16]). Thus the civil society organisations are one that promotes the public good, encourages empowerment and people’s participa- tion. 3. Global Civil Society Global Civil Society (GCS) has emerged as an aspect of globalisation in the globalised world. Mary Kaldor de- fines, “global civil society is about “civilising” or de- mocratising globalisati on, about t he process through whic h groups, movements and individuals somewhat can de- mand a global rule of law, global justice and global em- powerment (Kaldor, [17])”. Further, Kaldor, Anheier and Glasius, have visualised that “the GCS both feeds on and reacts to globalisation. This seems to be reflected in a strong and positive correlation between clusters of globa- lisation and clusters of GCS (Anheier, [18])”. They have defined GCS as “the sphere of ideas, values, networks and individuals located primarily o utside the institutional complexes of family, market, and the state, and beyond the confines of national societies, po lities and economies (Kaldor, [19])”. The participants of GCS and their values are “... at least in part, located in some transnational arena and not bound or limited by nation-states or local societies (Kaldor, [19])”. Thus GCS can be defined as the sum of laws, policies and institutions that constitute, and mediate trans-border relations between states, cultures, citizens, intergovernmental and nongovernmental orga- nisations and the market. 4. Nature of Global Civil Society Global Civil Society has started to work to promote a truly democratic and participatory public sphere at the Copyright © 2012 SciRes. BLR
The Role of Global Civil Society in Global Governance 208 global level. In this sense, “it has becomes a global pub- lic sphere comprising active citizenship, growing self- organisation outside formal political geographies (Jenlink, [20])”. GCS is also considered as a realm of socio-poli- tical activity created domestically and internationally by the expansion of cap italist social relations, where modern social movements pursue their stated goals. The main agencies associated to the rise of a GCS, are the INGOs and transnational advocacy groups etc. The civil society reflects its global nature in a real sense when campaigns adopted by the transborder orga- nisations especially International Non Governmental Or- ganisations (INGOs), voluntary associations self orga- nise with the purpose of resolving global problems and, are motivated by sentiments of transnational solidarity (Scholte, [16]). According to the Union of International Associations “there were in 1998 some 16,500 active civic bodies whose members are spread across several coun- tries [21]”. There are some global bodies which are uni- tary and centralised in nature, for instance, the World Economic Forum (WEF), which assembles some 900 transborder companies under the motto of “entrepre- neurship in the global public interest (Scholte, [16])”. There are some global organisations, which are tempo- rary in nature that pursues a campaign around a particular issue. For example, on various occasions civil society groups have combined forces with development and/or environmental NGOs to lobby the World Bank on one or the other of its projects which are reflecting negative consequences (Fox and Brown, [22]). Global Civil Society is primarily concern with the issues that are transnational in nature. For example, in addres- sing the issue of climate change, various civic associa- tions and INGOs have campaigned on ecological pro- blems, like the loss of biological diversity and the deple- tion of ozone layer that have a supra-territorial impact (Jan Aart Scholte, [23]). GCS has played an important role in international politics. In the late 1990s, it gained public visibility primarily as a popular resistance move- ment challenging the institutions and policies of eco- nomic globalisation. The term GCS was printed in a major world newspaper in 1991, when Eduard Shevardnadze [24] the then Sov iet Foreign Minister, saw the possibility of a new world order based on the rule of law at the global level. He wrote, “It seems to me that from an his- torical perspective we are moving towards the formation of a global civil society based on the precepts of law. If this is the case, then it would be worth seeing whether we couldn’t approach international problems and challenges more or less in the way that democratic systems resolve domestic issues (Shevardnadze, [24])”. The statement has highlighted the importance of GCS. There are several factors who have contributed in the emergence of the concept of GCS. The capitalism, par- ticularly through the integration of global financial mar- kets has assumed a new global form (Coleman [25]). Wapner [26] adds, “While many regions have possessed market economies for centuries, there is now a globalised marketplace in which individuals and corporations pro- duce, transport, and sell products the world over. The globalisation of markets circumscribes a domain across national boundaries in which people can interact free from complete governmental penetration and extends the experience of private economic activity”. O’Brien [27], in his study on Global Activism around World Economic Institutions has described that “the increasing economic interdependence amongst states is stimulating the process of GCS. In addition, the states are currently confronting many global problems such as climate change, stability of financial markets, and the protection of human rights that’s why they have moved to set up more and more intergovernmental organisations, which are operating on a global scale (O’Brien, [27])”. Finally, GCS emerged as a major social force in the late twenty century to resist an assault on public life and democracy by the institutions of economic globalisation. Initially, the resistance was centered on the Bretton Woods Institutions (Vujad inovic [28]). Subsequ ently, the resistance directed its attention to the glob al corporations and the financial markets in the developed and develop- ing regions. Consequently the high concentration of global civil society organisations is found in the deve- loped and developing world. Global civil society organisations have raised many questions concerning to contemporary global economy, in relation to transborder production, trade, investment, money and finance (Vujadinovic, [28]). The activism of these organisations has been directed towards at global governance agencies like the United Nations, the Bretton Woods institutions, the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD), and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) (Vujadinovic, [28]. These institu- tions are primarily concerned with the arena of global governance. 5. Global Civil Society and Global Governance It is argued by many scholars that the globalisation is altering the general position of the state. The rise of su- praterritoriality has broken the state’s effective monopoly on governance. As Scholte, [16] argued that “the elec- tions centered on the state are not by themselves an ade- quate expression of citizenship and democracy. After all, substantial regulation now also occurs through public multilateral agencies like the IMF and the Bank for In- ternational Settlements (BIS) where the states have little direct influence (Scholte, [16])”. The transnational net- works of the civil society organisations, especially, the Copyright © 2012 SciRes. BLR
The Role of Global Civil Society in Global Governance 209 INGOs such as Amnesty International, Greenpeace, Ox- fam International, have spread across national borders and has served and serving as a source of governance through dissemination of information, formation of open forums for dialogue and debate, and advocacy of greater democracy, transparency and accountability in govern- mental and multilateral institutions (Patrick Hayden, [29]). Global civil society has therefore come into central role when citizens have attempted to acquire a greater voice in post-sovereign governance. The exponential growth of INGOs since the 1970s has been matched by their increasing influence over diverse aspects of international relations (Peter J. Spiro, [30]). According to the Yearbook of International Organiza- tions [31], the number of international NGOs has risen from approximately 2795 in 1974, to 14,333 in 1989 to 20,851 in 2003. The time period of 1990s is very unique in the sense that, the greater cumulative numbers of IN- GOs as well as their greater willingness for direct in- volvement in governance institutions as indicated by the exponential growths in the number of INGOs. The r ise of number’s shows that globalisation has certainly produced a fresh wave of transnational activism which might rea- sonably be described as constituting a GCS and new frameworks of international political rule known as “g lo- bal governance”. The International relations theorists, James Rosenau employed the theoretical dynamics of global governance as a way to model the international system. The theories of global governance draw attention to the increasing importance of global civil society. The global gover- nance is “an analytic concept that builds on and expands prior neoliberal theories of international regimes or globa- lisation (Meyer, [32])”. Global governance is generally viewed as the management and resolution of global is- sues within a political space that has no single centralised authority. It is as an “efforts to bring more reliable and orderly responses to social and political issues that go beyond the capacities of states to address individually (Gordenker and Weiss, [33])”. These definitions indi- cates that the global governance deals with the interde- pendent nature of decision making and the attempt by actors to manage or produce more orderly responses to common problems. Global Governance is generally re- fers to problem-solving arrangements at the global level. The influence of global civil society in international relations has been increased in global governance. Global governance theorists such as Leon Gordenker and Tho- mas Weiss have spoken of the “pluralisation” of this phenomenon through the incorporation of NGOs and other non-state actors into the governance process. The constituent NGOs working in different sectors can inter- act with these organisations. As a consequence, grass- roots groups get a voice and attempt to influence po- licy-making (Gordenker and Weiss, [33]). Similarly, in their study, Robert O’Brien, Jan Aart Scholte and Marc Williams [34] have highlighted “the development of a “complex multilateralism”,2 which, in response to GCS Organisations pressure, has incrementally pluralised the governing structures so that, multilateral economic insti- tutions are moving beyond their inter-state mandates to actively engage civil society actors in different coun- tries.” The example is the role of International Tele- communication Union (ITU), which assists in governing, and setting standards in telecommunications issues among countries (Kontrak Belajar, [36])”. The international re- gimes are closely associated to the international organi- sations and international treaties. However, international regimes are institutions, which are non material pheno- mena unlike other international organisations (Ryo Oshiba, [37]). Gordenker and W eiss have recogn ised the role of G CS organisations and their participation in the global gover- nance. According to them “the NGOs participation can be stretched back to the founding of the International La- bour Organisation (ILO) in 1919 and the establishment of the United Nation’s Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) in 1946 (Alejandro Colas, [35])”. It was the ECOSOC that laid down the conditions of NGO accredit- tation at the United Nations, which determined many of the main features of the system as it still operates today (Willetts, [38]). The UN Charter’s Article 71, [39] have incorporates the provisions for the NGOs as a consulta- tive status (Otto, [40]). It is simply to underline, how the ECOSOC framework for NGOs consultative status has been the basis of those UN world conferences on envi- ronment Rio de Janeiro,1992, Human Rights Vienna, 1993, and conference on women at Beijing, 1995, which have reflected as representatives of the global civil society. The transformative role of NGOs has becomes apparent from these conferences (Alejandro Colas, [35]). Ronaldo Munck states, “It is very significant that the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions had demanded a place at the “top table” at Copenhagen con- ference in keeping with the International Labor Organi- zation tripartism. It was only after the Copenhagen ev ent, in which it eventually participated as part of the NGO Forum, that the Internation al Trade Union movement be- gan to conceive of itself as, effectively implication part 2O’Brien declares that their concept of “complex multilateralism” is shift away from the conventional understanding of multilateralism; as a asic institutional form coordinating relations amongst three or more states. It originated in a desire to explore the relationship between multi- lateral economic organisations and citizens. The practices of “complex multilateralism” emerge whereby governance in these areas lies in the contestation and cooperation between the WTO, member-states, other intergovernmental organizations, non-governmental organizations and civil society, and private business interests. This approach provides the tools for dealing with the full range of actors involved, especially non- state actors. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. BLR
The Role of Global Civil Society in Global Governance 210 of the GCS (Munck, [41])”. The report of the Commis- sion on Global Governance 1995 made a first step pro- posal for an annual World civil society forum linked with the regular sessions of the UN General Assembly. The Global Governance Commission 1995, proposed that an annual forum of civil society should be held at UN headquarter, and should consist of representatives of civil society organisations accredited to the General As- sembly. In the following years the proposal was included on the agenda of the General Assembly’s working group on the strengthening of the United Nations system. This initiative was welcomed as “bold and imaginative” by then UN Secretary-General, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, who advocated the creation of “representing associations” of NGOs whose representatives would work with the United Nations. [42] The influential groups especially INGOs have became an effective instrument of global governance (Munck, [41]). “The governance has been viewed primarily as in- tergovernmental relationships and it involves NGOs, citi- zen’s movements, multinational corporations, and the global market. The NGOs and intergovernmental orga- nisations grope, som e tim es cooperatively, sometim es com- petitively, sometimes in parallel towards a modicum of global gover nance on its own wa y” (Gord enker & W eiss, [43]). Thus global governance is an effort to bring colla- boration and cooperation among governments and others who seek to encourage common practices and goals in addressing global issues (Gordenker & Weiss, [43]). The government is the governing body of a nation or community to rest with formal institutions and so on. James Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel’s have argued that “world affairs have shifted from a system of govern- ment to governance retain s the notion that to gove rn is to provide the institutionalised norms and frameworks for action (Langley, [44])”. Global civil society is necessary to provide accountability in a system of global gover- nance because it is seen as outside of the government and emerges as a domain that simultaneously reacts to the “internationalisation” of the state. I affirm the views of Alejandro Colas that “the agents of the GCS f ulfill a func- tional or operational role as grassroots partners of multi- lateral institutions in the administration of global gover- nance” (Alejandro Colas, [35]). 6. Global Civil Society, Global Governance and Nation State There is an intense debate and divergent views on the nature and future of the nation-state in the era of globa- lisation. Some scholars views that there is a trend to- wards the end of the nation-state or erosion/weakening of the nation-state; others are held that there is a trend of forced retreat of the welfare state, adaptation of nation- state to the neoliberal globalisation, and finally some are views that neither weakening nor end of nation-state and the state is both victim and facilitator of globalisation. The global citizen is represented more clearly and directly not by governmental bodies but by a variety of organisa- tions that are at least relatively independent of nation- states (Hardt and Negri, [45]). The expansion of the role of global civil society and global governance should not be seen as the end of state sovereignty. The institutions of global governance—many social movements that operate within global civil society, can and do engage with the institutions of global go- vernance, and indeed influence the operation and poli- cies of these institutions (Alejandro Colas, [35]). It is, however, to insist that “th e interaction between GCS and the institutions of global governance is still mediated through the structure of state sovereignty in ways that prevent the superficial domestic analogy between the sta te and civil society on the one hand, and G CS as a counter- part to international institutions of global governance on the other (Alejandro Colas, [35])”. The most influential formulation of this promise be- hind globalisation is th e institutions of glob al governance and global civil society, which is found in Held’s pro- posals for “cosmopolitan democracy”. For Held, the con- cept of “cosmopolitan democracy” refers to “a model of political organisation in which citizens, wherever they are located in the world, have a voice, input and political representation in international affairs, in parallel with and independently of their own governments (Held, [46])”. In the debate of the decline/erosion of state sovereignty, I have the same opinion as of Fred Halliday [47]. Accor- ding to him, “the erosion of the Westphalian system rests upon a contemporary optic and illusion.” The “new” non- state actors in fact trace their heritage back to long before the nation state Westphalian system. The current interest in global civil society and global governance can be seen as simply part of a parochial shift in International rela- tions theory from the realist or statist perspective toward a concern with non-state or civil society actors and issues (Munck, [43] ). 7. Conclusions Global Civil Society and global governance has become important features of contemporary international rela- tions. Global Civil Society provides mechanism for glo ba l collaboration and coordination for resolving global pro- blems. GCSOs organisations give voice and stimulate de- bates amongst citizens on the various global conflicting issues and making important contributions to the democ- ratisation of global governance. GCSOs have been able to exert an effective in fluence on policy-making at the in- ternational level. These organisations are the means of global governance and transforming the norms of inter- national politics through providing more effective solu- Copyright © 2012 SciRes. BLR
The Role of Global Civil Society in Global Governance 211 tions to local problems than national governments or even international organisations, and acting as a powerful coun- ter—weight to traditional power politics. Global civil society makes more aware of global issues and playing a positive and balancing role between glo- balisation and the natio n states. It can also contribute sig- nificantly to the public education about global gover- nance, thereby empowering citizens to involve themselves meaningfully in the regulatory processes and can stimu- late public debate about current and possible future courses of global governance. REFERENCES [1] C. C. Rangarajan, “Responding to Globalization: India’s Answer,” The 4th Ramanbhai Patel Memorial Lecture, Ahmedabad, 2006. http://eac.gov.in/aboutus/speech.htm [2] R. Robertson, “Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture,” Sage, London, 1992. [3] I. Wallerstein, “The Politics of the World Economy,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984. [4] J. A. Scholte, “Globalisation and Collective Identi ties,” In: J. Krause and N. Renwick, Eds., Identities in Interna- tional Relations, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1996. [5] K. Chaudhary, “Global Civil Society, Globalization and Nation State,” Toronto, 2004. http://www.istr.org/resource/resmgr/working_papers_toro nto/choudhary.kameshwar.pdf [6] M. Goodhart, “Democracy, Globalisation and the Pro- blem of the State,” Polity, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2001, pp. 527- 546. [7] Y. Aiyar, “Globalisation in India: Civil Society Response,” National Centre for Advocacy Studies, Pune, 2007. [8] D. I. Pietrzyk, “Civil Society: Conceptual History from Hobbes to Marx,” Marie Curie Working Papers, Univer- sity of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, 2001. http://graduateinstitute.ch/webdav/site/political_science [9] F. Copleston, “A History of British Philosophy: Hobbes to Hume,” Continuum Press, London, 2003. [10] A. Roy, “Civil Society and Nation State: In the Context of Globalisation,” Economic Political Weekly, Vol. 30, No.31-32, 1995, pp. 2005-2010. [11] Hegel, “Elements of the Philosophy of Right,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. [12] G. Hyden, “Julius Court and Ken Mease, Civil Society and Governance in 16 Developing Countries,” World Go- vernance Survey Discussion Paper, London, 2003. [13] Hegel, “Philosophy of Right,” Oxford University Press, London, 1942. [14] A. B. Seligman, “Civil Society as Idea and Ideal,” In: S. Chambers and W. Kymlicka, Eds., Alternative Concep- tions of Civil Society, Princeton University Press, Prince- ton, 2002. [15] A. Gramsci, “Selections from Prison Note Book,” In: Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith, Eds., Elec Book, London, 1999. [16] J. A. Scholte, “Global Civil Society: Changing the World,” CSGR Working Paper, University of Warwick, Warwick, 1999, pp. 1-35. [17] M. Kaldor, “The Idea of Global Civil Society,” In: G. Baker and D. Chandler, Eds., Global Civil Society: Con- tested Futures, Routledge, New York, 2005, pp. 103-112. [18] H. Anheier, M. Kaldor and M. Glasius, “Global Civi l So- ciety,” 2001. http://www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/global/Yearbook [19] H. Kaldor, Anheier, and M. Glasius, “Global Civil So- ciety,” Sage Publications, London, 2003. [20] P. M. Jenlink, “Globalization and the Evolution of Demo- cratic Civil Society: Democracy as Spatial Discourse,” World Futures, Vol. 63, No. 5-6, 2007, pp. 386-407. [21] K. G. Sauer, “Union of International Associations,” Year- book of International Organizations, Sauer, Munich, 1998. [22] J. A. Fox and L. D. Brown, “The Struggle for Account- ability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Move- ments,” MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998. [23] J. A. Scholte, “Global Civil Society,” In: L. Richard and M. Smith, Eds., Perspectives on World Politics, Rout- ledge, New York, 2006. [24] E. Shevardnadze, “A Democratic Way with World Af- fairs: New World Order? Co-operation and Not Competi- tion in Weapons of Mass Destruction should determine the Future,” Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 2006. [25] W. D. Coleman, “The Origins of Global Civil Society and Non-Territorial Governance: Some Empirical Reflections Globalization and Autonomy,” http://www.globalautonomy.ca/global1/article.jsp?index [26] Wapner, “The Normative Promise of Non-state Actors: A Theoretical Account of Global Civil Society,” In: Wapner and L. E. J. Ruiz, Eds., Principled World Politics: The Challenges of Normative International Relations, Row- man and Littlefield, New York, 2000. [27] R. O’Brien, A. M. Goetz, J. A. Scholte and M. Williams, “Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements,” Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000. [28] D. Vujadinovic, “Global Civil Society as Concept and Practice in the Processes of Globalization,” Synthesis Phi - losophica, Vol. 47, 2009, pp. 79-99. [29] P. Hayden, “Cosmopolitan Global Politics,” Ashgate Pu- blication, Burlington, 2005. [30] P. J. Spiro, “New Global Communities: Nongovernmental Organizations in International Decision-Making Institu- tions,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1995, pp. 45-56. doi:10.1080/01636609509550131 [31] Yearbook of International Organizations, 2004. http://www.uia.org/statistics/pub.php. [32] W. H. Meyer, “Indigen ous Right s, Global Governa nce, and State Sovereignty,” Human Rights Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2012, pp. 327-347. [33] L. Gordenker and T. G. Weiss, “Pluralizing Global Go- vernance: Analytical Approaches and Dimensions,” In: T. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. BLR
The Role of Global Civil Society in Global Governance Copyright © 2012 SciRes. BLR 212 G. Weiss and L. Gordenker, Eds., NGOs the UN and Glo- bal Governance, Boulder, 1996. [34] R. O’Brien, J. A. Scholte and M. Williams, “Contesting Governance: Multilateralism and Global Social Move- ments,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491603 [35] A. Colas, “The Promises of International Civil Society: Global Governance, Cosmopolitan Democracy and the End of Sovereignty,” 2001. http://www.theglobalsite.ac.uk/press/107colas.pdf [36] K. Belajar, “International Regimes and Global Gover- nance,” 2008. http://wsetiabudi.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/kuliah12.p df [37] R. Oshiba, “International Regimes,” 2004. http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C04/E6-32-05-04. pdf [38] P. Willetts, “The Conscience of the World: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organisations in the UN System,” Hurst & Co., London, 1996. [39] The Economic and Social Council may Make Suitable Arrangements for Consulting with Non-Governmental Organizations Which Are Concerned with Matters within Its Competence. Such Arrangements May Be Made with International Organizations and, Where Appropriate, with National Organisations after Consultation with the Mem- ber of the United Nations Concerned,” United Nations Char- ter, Article 71. [40] D. Otto, “Non-Governmental Organizations in the United Nations: The Emerging Role of International Civil So- ciety,” The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996. [41] R. Munck, “Civil Society: Myth and Prospect,” In: R. Taylor, Ed., Creating a Better World: Interpreting Global Civil Society , Kumarian Press, Sterling, 2004. [42] “Chronology of Calls for Non-Governmental Participa- tion in Global Governance in the UN,” 2010. http://ungalink.org.uk/__oneclick_uploads/2010/09/un_n go_chronology.htm [43] L. Gordenker and T. G. Weiss, “NGOs, the United Nations and Global Governance,” Lynne Rienner, Boulder, 1996. [44] L. A. Langley, “Global Civil Society and Global Gover- nability,” In: R. D. Germain, Ed., The Idea of Global Ci- vil Society: Politi cs and Ethics in a Globalizing Era, Rout- ledge, New York, 2005. [45] M. Hardt and A. Negri, Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2000. [46] D. Held, “Introduction,” In: D. Archibugi and D. Held, Eds., Cosmopolitan Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1995. [47] F. Halliday, “The Romance of Non-State Actors,” In: D. Josselin and Wallace, Eds., Non State Actors in World Politics, Palgrave, London, 2000.
|