Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, Vol. 11, No.3, pp.311-320, 2012
jmmce.org Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
311
Optimum Calcium Carbonate Filler Conc entration for Flexible Polyuretha ne
Foam Composit e
*M. A. Usman1, S. O. Adeosun2 and G. O. Osifeso1
1Department of Chemical Engineering, 2Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering,
University of Lagos, Akoka –Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: mawwal04@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
The production cost of flexible polyurethane foam is significantly dependent on the cost of
polyol, which constitute the largest percentage of materials used in foam production with the
characteracterics to induce superior mechanical properties. Suitable fillers that are relatively
cheap can be introduced in the foam matrix as replacement for polyol. However, certain
compositions of filler have deleterious effect on some relevant mechanical properties of the
foam. Thi s paper investigates the effect of CaCO3 filler in flexible polyurethane foam matrix for
the dual purposes of achieving sustained mechanical properties and reduction in production
cost. The optimum CaCO3 composition was found to be 20 wt % representing a concomitant
18.54% reduction in cost of production.
Key words: polyurethane, CaCO3, tensile strength, elongation at break, indentation hardness.
1. INTRODUCTIO N
Flexible pol yurethane fo ams are one of the most important classes of cellular plastic used in the
manufacture of such materials as foam mattresses, pillows, furniture, cushioning materials for
automobiles, packing, recreation, shoes, etc [1]. The global consumption of flexible polyurethane
foam was estimated to be above 7 million metric tons in 2007 and the average annual growth rate
is about 5% [2]. In general, industries that produce flexible polyurethane foams use fillers to
modify the material’s properties in some way to achieve dimensional stability ease of retraction
from the mold and service density [3-4]. When adding a filler to a pol ymer to form a conjugated
biphasic material, the tension applied to the polymeric matrix will be transferred in part to the
312 M. A. Usman, S. O. Adeosun Vol.11, No.3
disperse filler phase since it presents properties superior to the pure polymer [5]. The use of
several fillers to achieve improved properties in foam has been widely studied [6]. Some notable
ones include inorganic materials such as calcium carbonate, dolomite, aluminum silica, titanium
dioxide, and talc [6] while some of the organic materials used as filler are carbon black and
natural fibers [7-8].
In flexible polyurethane foams, the fillers promote an increase in density and resistance to
compression. However, they reduce the resilience and contribute to the increase in permanent
deformation. In addition, properties such as tear strength are significantly affected by the
introduction of filler [9]. Accordingly, it is necessary to determine the correct concentration of
the filler in the polymer matrix, so as to obtain a product of reliable quality [10].
Usage of flexible polyurethane foam in Sub- Sahara Africa has been mainly for mattresses and
furniture and recently, there has been a growing demand for durable and high hardness
charact eristic (i.e. high compression resistant) foam at low cost [11]. Foams with these qualities
are of interest to many sect ors of the economy, and therefore their preparation, characteristics,
and applications are subject interes t [12]. However, the cost of petro-chemical based polyol,
which constitute the largest percentage of materials used in foam production and which possess
the characteristics to induce superior mechanical properties in foam currently commands a high
value due to the rising costs of the petro-chemical feed stocks [13].
Several studies have been conducted on the suitability of calcium carbonate as filler in flexible
polyurethane foam composite. Notable ones are the works of Sabina et. al[14] and Latinwo
et.al.[12,15]. Sabina et. al.[14] investigated the physico-chemical properties of flexible
polyurethane foam containing commercial CaCO3 and observed that the excess of commercial
CaCO3 utilized in industry causes the increase of hysteresis, possibly causing permanent
deformations and damaging the quality of the final product. Latinwo et. al. [12] studied the effect
of CaCO3 of different compositions and particle size distributions on the mechanical properties
of flexible polyurethane foam. The study repor ted that finely divided filler material increased the
hardness characteristics of the foam to compositions of up to 35wt%, while coarse filler did not
show any appreciable improvement in the property. For all particle sizes, the tensile strength and
elongation at break decreased while increasing filler content.
It is evident from previous works that foam properties are optimized at specific filler
composition and particle size distribution. However, cost implication was not given prime
consideration in these works.
For example, the cost be nefit of nano-size filler particle is doubtful considering the cost of
nanotechnology. Therefore, this paper p resen ts th e resu lts of the effect of various composition of
Vol.11, No .3 Optimum Calcium Carbonate Filler Conce ntratio n 313
CaCO3 as rep lacem ent for polyol in th e range 0-30 wt % on the mechanical properties of flexible
polyurethane foam with the view to determining the optimum properties and cost implication.
2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY
The flexible foam production method employed is a continuous one known as the Slab Stock
Foaming process. In this process, the raw materials are weighed, measured and/or metered
continuously from separate lines into an in-line mixer while the mixed reactants still in liquid
form are poured into a continuous mould with paper covering on a mould conveyor. In the
mould, the foaming proper takes place to form a solid continuous block of foam.
The slab stock foaming process usually commences with the preparation, treatment and
conditioning of the chemicals. The polyol and toluene di-isocyanate to be used must be cooled t o
a temperature between 22 – 25oC and 20 – 22oC respectively. This is important as the density,
viscosity and chemical reactivity of the two chemicals vary with temperature. This chilling
operation is accomplished using Chiller units with a Shell and Tube h eat e xch anger connected to
the storage tanks containing the chemicals. Also, the stannous octoate to be used is pre mixed
with polyol in the ratio 1:11. Likewise, amine is also pre mixed with polyol in the ratio 2:3.
Thereafter the Foam Formulation Sheet is prepared. This polyol – based formulation sheet
contain a list of the chemicals needed for the production and their various calculated proportions
usually based on parts per 100 parts of polyol. This formulation is then used to calibrate the
various meters, gauges and flow lines in the plant. The raw materials are pumped to the mixer
head in their correct proportions.
Metering accuracy and continuous uniform flow is maintained as any error will lead to the
production of poor quality foam. In other to ensure the metering accuracy, each production line
is calibrated to determine the efficiency of the machine before production commenced.
Before the production process proper is carried o ut a Laboratory Mix (box foam) or laboratory
analysis is done. Experience has shown that efficiency of production is greatly enhanced when
the laboratory analysis is integrated into the production programme. Laboratory analysis is a
process by which a little quantity of foam is made in the laboratory under controlled conditions.
The essence of this is to:
Evaluate the suitability of the raw materials in a proposed formulation;
Determine the actual levels of activators and silicone required for efficient production;
Check for the presence of contaminants in any of the chemicals; and
Determine appropriate cream and rise times of a proposed formulation.
314 M. A. Usman, S. O. Adeosun Vol.11, No.3
Samples from foam produced are cut into various sizes suitable for their respective test
equipment. For this work, varying concentration of CaCO3 ranging from 0 to 30 wt % were
introduced into the formulation as shown in Table 1 and the following properties measured:
density, tensile strength, elongation, compression set, indentation and hardness characteristics.
Table 1. Formulation Table for Experi ment.
SAMPLES AND CONCENTRATIONS
C H E MICALS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Polyol (g)
1000
950
900
850
800
750
700
CaCO
3
(g)
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
TDI (g)
516.00
490.20
464.40
438.60
392.80
387.00
361.20
Water (g)
42.00
39.90
37.80
35.70
33.60
31.50
29.40
Amine (g)
0.80
0.76
0.72
0.68
0.64
0.60
0.56
Stannous (g)
2.00
1.90
1.80
1.70
1.60
1.50
1.40
Silicone (g)
10.00
9.50
9.00
8.50
8.00
7.50
7.00
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The percentage (%) composition of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3) in each sample varies from 0%
in Sample A to 30% in sample G at 5% interval. The foam properties studied and their
corresponding results are as shown in Figures 1 – 6.
Figure 1 illustrates the rise time variation and it shows a uniform decrement in rise time as
calcium carbo nate (CaC O3) concentration increases. This implies that the foam rises faster when
the filler composition increases indicating that the blowing / gas production reaction between
toluene-di-isoc yanate an d water occurs faster. It could t herefore be i nferred th at the intro duction
of fillers in foam formulation greatly influences the reaction time which is a positive
development.
The density of the foam is improved as CaCO 3 content increases to 30% as shown in Figure 2.
There is a gradual increase in density value until 20% filler concentration before a sharp rise in
density oc curred aft erward s. Thi s clearly indi cate t hat th e fill er concent rati on coul d be as h igh as
20% and still produce the same density foam (22.6kg/m3)as when not introduced at all
(21.1kg/m3).
It is however worthy of note that it is possible to still maintain the density while increasing filler
concentration further, if so desired. This could be done by making adjustments in the other
chemical compositions. The 20% filler concentration obtained as optimum in this study is just
the most convenient to determine the effect of fillers on foam manufacture.
Vol.11, No .3 Optimum Calcium Carbonate Filler Conce ntratio n 315
Also, one of the properties of foam that disti nguishes good foam from a ba d one is its pe rcenta ge
elongation which describes its elastic properties. Figure 3 shows that the elastic property of the
foam was maintained between the normal ranges of 90–110 kN/m2 up till the point where the
filler concentration is about 20%. Thereafter, a sharp drop in the elastic property was
experienced. This depicts also that the elastic property of foam can be maintained while
introducing fillers into the concentration.
316 M. A. Usman, S. O. Adeosun Vol.11, No.3
Furthermore, in Figure 4 the tensile strength of the foam was maintain ed until 20% filler content
(145-120 kPa) after which there was a sharp and sudden decrease in tensile strength. The
compression and load bearing ability of the foam was uniform (3.5%) between 0-10% CaCO3
despite the introduction of the filler until 20% filler addition with an exception at 15% CaCO3
(5.5%) (see Figure 5). When there was no filler in the formulation the foam resilience steadily
increased to 148 (see Figure 6) as the filler was being introduced.
Vol.11, No .3 Optimum Calcium Carbonate Filler Conce ntratio n 317
Cost effectiveness of this foam formulation is another significant aspect of this study. The r esult
of this research has shown that CaCO 3 filler can be introduced into the foam formulation up to
20% optimum content with enh anced foam qualities as when no filler was used. Cost analysis of
the cost of production for formulation without filler (sample A) and formulation with 20% filler
318 M. A. Usman, S. O. Adeosun Vol.11, No.3
concentration (sample E) is presented below after carrying out a market survey. The current
market prices per kilogram of each chemical used and the foam formulations for samples A and
E are shown in Tables 2 and 3 respectively based on their requirements for production.
Table 2. Cost Per kg of Each Chemical in Foam Formulation
CHEMICALS
COSTS OF 1 KG (#)
Polyol
273.00
CaCO
3
70.00
TDI
356.00
Water
50.00
Amine
608.00
Stannous
1000.00
Silicone
800.00
Table 3. Total Cost of Production per kg of Each Chemical in Foam Formulation
SAMPLES AND COST ESTIMATES
CHEMICALS
Sample A
(0%)
COST
ESTIMATE (#)
Sample E
(20%)
COST
ESTIMATE (#)
Polyol (g)
1000
273.00
800
218.40
CaCO
3
(g)
0.0
0.00
200.0
14.00
TDI (g)
516.00
183.70
392.80
139.84
Water (g)
42.00
2.10
33.60
1.68
Amine (g)
0.80
0.49
0.64
0.39
Stannous (g)
2.00
2.00
1.60
1.60
Silicone (g)
10.00
8.00
8.00
6.4
Total Costs
#469.29
#382.31
To estimate the percentage reduction in cost of production given the total costs in Table 3,
equation 1
100
cos
coscos
Re% x
talsampleAtot
talsampleEtottalsampleAtot
duction
=
1
%54.18100
29.469
31.382
29.469
Re% =
=xduction
Vol.11, No .3 Optimum Calcium Carbonate Filler Conce ntratio n 319
Hence, the cost of production was reduced by about 18.54% while the foam qualities and
properties were either maintained or improved upon as the CaCO3 filler was introduced into the
foam formulation to an optimum 20% content. Thus CaCO3 can effectively replace polyol in
flexible foam manufacture. Therefore the introduction of CaCO3 into foam formulation will not
only help reduce the cost of production but also help to maintain/or improve the foam qualities
and its physical properties thereby making this an attractive venture.
4. CONCLUSION
This study has shown that calcium carbonate addition in foam formulation increase the rate of
the blowing / gas production reaction between toluene-di-isoc yanate and water with reduction in
the rise time. However the elastic and tensile strength characteristics of fo am are n ot aff ected b y
the presence of the filler. If calcium carbonate filler is properly introduced into the foam
formulation, the desired tensile strength and elastic qualities of the foam can be achieved, and in
effect significantly improves the foam resilience ability as the desired load bearing ability is
enhanc ed .
REFERENCES
1. Woods G. The ICI Polyurethanes Book. 2 ed. New York: Wiley; 1990.
2. Avar G. Polyurethanes (PU). Kunststoffe International. 2008; (10): 123-127.
3. Saliba CC, Oréfice RL, Carneiro JRG, Duarte AK, Schneider WT, Fernandes MRF. Effect of
the incorporation of a novel natural inorganic I3 438 Sant’Anna et al. Materials Research
short fiber on the properties of polyurethane composites. Polym. Test. 2005; 24(7): 819-824.
4. Bartczak Z, Argon AS, Cohen RE, Weinberg M. Toughness mechanism in semi-crystalline
polymer blends: II. High-density polyethylene toughened with calcium carbonate filler
particles. Polymer 1999; 40(9): 2347-2365.
5. Callister WD. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 5 ed. New York: John
Wiley & Sons; 2000.
6. Nunes RCR, Fonseca JLC, Pereira MR. Pol ymer-filler interactions and mechanical properties
of a polyurethane elastomer. Polym. Test. 2000; 19(1): 93-103.
7. Mothé CG, Araújo CR, Oliveira MA, Yoshida MI. Thermal decomposition kinetics of
polyurethane-composites with bagasse of sugar cane. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2002; 67(2):
305-312.
8. Mothé CG, Araújo CR. Properties of polyurethane elastomers and composites by thermal
analysis. Thermochim. Acta. 2000; 357-358(14): 321-325.
9. Vilar W. Química e Tecnologia de Poliuretanos. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Vilar Consultoria;
1998.
10. International Organization for Standardization. ISO document 3386-1. Polymeric materials,
320 M. A. Usman, S. O. Adeosun Vol.11, No.3
cellular flexible: Determination of stress-strain characteristics in compression. Part 1, Low-
density materials. Geneva; 1986.
11. Latinwo G.K. The Predictive Effects of Filler Materials on the Mechanical Properties of
Flexible Polyurethane Foam. Ph.D Thesis, University of Lagos, Nigeria, 2009.
12. Latinwo, G.K., Aribike, D.S., Oyekunle, L.O., Susu, A. A., Kareem, S.A, Effects of Calcium
Carbonate of Different Compositions and Particle Size Distribution on the Mechanical
Propert ies of Flexible Polyurethane Foam, Nature and Science, 2010, 8(9), 92-101.
13. Niemeyer T., Patel M., and Geiger E. A Further Examination of Soy-Based Polyols in
Polyurethane Systems. Alliance for the Polyurethane Industry Technical Conference. Salt
Lake City, UT, 2006
14. Sabrina Sá e Sant’Annaa, Denilson Arlindo de Souzaa, Danielle Marques de
Araujoa, Cornélio de Freitas Carvalhob, Maria Irene Yoshidaa, P hysi co -
chemical Analysis of Flexible Polyurethane Foams Containing Commercial
Calcium Carbonate, Material Research, 2008, 11(4), 433 – 438.
15. Ganiyu Kayode Latinwo, David Stan Aribike, Alfred Akpoveta Susu, Semiu Adebayo
Kareem, Effects of Different Filler Treatments on the Morphology and Mechanical
Properties of Flexible Polyurethane Foam Composites, Nature and Science, 2010, 8(6), 23-
31.