A. ZOMORRODI ET AL. 7
to the external iliac vein without more tension. Previ-
ously In our kidney transplant center there was a few
cases of kidney transplant that in them the allograft has
been placed in inversion position unknowingly but in
follow up they have not any urologic problem so it was
understood that inversion position from urologic stand-
point is safe. selection the external iliac artery support
the length of the renal vein because it causes the renal
vein of right allograft kidney placing directly in the front
of the external iliac vein without any deviation and first
anastomosing the renal vein support the length of renal
vein because in this condition the selection of place for
anastomosing on the external iliac vein is done freely and
unlimitedly (artery is long and free withou t leathering the
vein). Injection heparin is important in reducing throm-
bosis.
4. Conclusion
Our suggestion technique facilitates the right allograft
vein anastomosing and overall it seems to reduce the
early complication of the right allograft kidney trans-
plantation it is necessary to continue these techniques
with more cases to definitive finding.
REFERENCES
[1] D. W. Gjertson, “Multifactorial Analysis of Renal Trans-
plants Reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing
Registry,” Clinical Transplantation, 1992, pp. 299-317.
[2] N. J. Feduska, Jr. and J. M. Cecka, “Donor Factors,”
Clinical Transplantation, 1994, pp. 381-394.
[3] S.Hariharan, C. P. Johnson, B. A. Bresnahan, S. E. Tar-
nanto, M. J. McIntosh and D. Stablein, “Improved Graft
Survival after Renal Transplantation in the United States,
1988 to 1996,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol.
342, No. 9, 2000, pp. 605-612.
[4] P. J. Phelan, W.Shields, P. O’Kelly, M.Pendergrass, J.
Holian, J. J. Walshe, C. Magee, D. Little, D. Hickey and
P. J. Conlon, “Left versus Right Deceased Donor Renal
Allograft Outcome,” Transplant International, 2009, Vol.
22, No. 12, pp. 1159-1163.
doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00933.x
[5] M. Salehipour, A. Bahador, H. Jalaeian, H. Salahi, S. Ni-
keghbalian, F. Khajehee and S. A. Malek-Ho sseini, “C om-
parison of Right and Left Grafts in Renal Transplanta-
tion,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplan-
tation, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2008, pp. 222-226.
[6] D. W. Johnson, D. W. Mudge, M. O. Kaisar, S. B. Camp-
bell, C. M. Hawley, N. M. Isbel, D. Wall, A. Griffin, J.
Preston and D. L. Nicol, “Deceased Donor Renal Trans-
plantation—Does Side Matter?” Nephrology Dialysis Tran s-
plantation, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2006, pp. 2583-2588.
doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl268
[7] E. D. Brown, M. Y. Chen, N. T. Wolfffian, D. J. Ott and
N. E. Watson, Jr., “Complications of Renal Transplanta-
tion: Evaluation with US and Radionuclide Imaging,”
RadioGraphics, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2000, pp. 607-622.
[8] A. K. Mandal, C. Cohen, R. A. Montgomery, L. R. Kavoussi
and L. E. Ratner, “Should the Indi cations for Lap ara sc op ic
Live Donor Nephrectomy of the Right Kidney Be the
Same as for the Open Procedure?” Transplantation, Vol.
71, No. 5, 2001, pp. 660-664.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. OJOTS