Graphene
Vol.03 No.04(2014), Article ID:50631,6 pages
10.4236/graphene.2014.34007

Design and Synthetic Scheme of Water Dispersible Graphene Oxide-Coumarin Complex for Ultra-Sensitive Fluorescence Based Detection of Copper (Cu2+) Ion in Aqueous Environment

Srijita Basumallick

Department of Nanoscience and Technology Center, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA

Email: srijitabasumallick@gmail.com

Copyright © 2014 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 11 August 2014; revised 4 September 2014; accepted 8 October 2014

ABSTRACT

Copper oxides and its salts are now widely used as pesticides to control fungal and bacterial diseases of field crops. Copper toxicity is often a major contributor of human health problems caused through accumulation of excess copper ions in various organs via drinking water, fruits and vegetables. So, detection and estimation of cupric ions in biological organs, drinking water, fruits and vegetables are extremely important. Recently, a fluorescence based sensor using coumarin dye (high quantum yield) has been proposed to detect micro-molar Cu++ ion in biological organs. But major problem with coumarin dye is that it is insoluble in water and undergoes dye-dye aggregation in organic solvents. We proposed here a synthetic scheme of preparation of graphene oxide conjugated coumarin dye derivative which would be water dispersible and expected to be an ideal candidate for Cu2+ ion estimation in biological organs and drinking water.

Keywords:

Copper Ion Estimation, Fluorescence Sensor, Graphene-Oxide, Coumarin

1. Introduction

Copper salts are extensively used as pesticides (i.e. fungicide/bactericides) to control fungal and bacterial diseases of field crops [1] . Global annual production of metallic copper and copper compounds reached 13.6 million metric tons in 1979 [2] and it is projected that Cu production will continue to increase in the future. Cu is naturally found in uncontaminated water sediment at a background concentration level ranging from 0.8 to 50 μg∙g−1 (on a sediment dry weight basis) [3] whereas Cu level in uncontaminated soil is estimated to be ~30 μg∙g−1 [4] . Aggressive use of Cu pesticides in agricultural industry is responsible for the accumulation of Cu in soil. There is an increasing concern that soil bound Cu might leach out from the agricultural fields and contaminate nearby water bodies such as rivers and lakes, adversely affecting the lives of aquatic vertebrates such as fish and invertebrates organisms. It is evident that continuous release of Cu to the environment through human activity will only increase the Cu level in drinking water and it could potentially exceed the EPA-set drinking water Cu limit (currently the limit is 1.3 ppm).

Copper is an essential trace element present in animal and plant tissue. However, overdose of Cu++ ion is toxic and harmful to human and plant species. The average concentration of copper in human blood is estimated to be in the range 15.7 - 23.6 µM. Cu bioaccumulation and its imbalance however can cause serious health problem. A number of organ damages including stomach, kidney, liver, and brain have been related to Cu imbalance. It is reported that brain metabolism process is regulated by Cu [5] [6] . A number of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer are linked to disturbance in Cu mediated metabolism processes [5] [6] . Other diseases such as Aceruloplasminemia [7] , Wilson’s and Menki’s syndrome has been also related to Cu imbalance.

There is certainly a strong need to develop sensitive probe for the detection of trace level of Cu in biological and environmental samples. Some of important applications of the proposed probe in the environment would include monitoring of i) residual Cu pesticides in the plant surface (leaves and stems and fruits), ii) agricultural soil samples and iii) Cu level in contaminated water.

1.1. Current Cu Ions Detection Techniques

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS), Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP-Absorption/Emission) Spectroscopy and electrochemical sensing techniques are currently used for measuring Cu2+ concentration in solution in the nanomolar to micromole range [8] -[11] . These techniques are expensive to run and extremely tedious. Sample preparation process is complex and time-consuming. Moreover, it is challenging to reliably detect ultra-low concentration of Cu ions in the picomolar to sub-nanomolar range using these techniques in presence of other interfering ions and dissolved molecules. Fluorescence based sensing probes have the potential to address some of the above challenges. Because of high sensitivity of fluorescence technique, it should be possible to detect ultra-low concentration of Cu ions in solution. To minimize interference, it is possible to design Cu ion selective fluorescence probes. It is also possible to increase signal-to-noise ratio by designing activatable sensing probes. Since this is an optical based technique, fabrication of a field-deployable sensor device could be possible.

Several studies have reported detection of Cu2+ in micro molar concentration in biological systems using fluorescent dyes [12] -[25] and fluorescent proteins [26] [27] . Weida Wang et al. used a fluorescent dye (2,4,6- trihydroxyphenylsquaraine) [20] as sensing probe to detect Cu ions. Despite a very complex synthesis strategy, cellular cytotoxicity was the primary limitation. In another study, 1,2,4-triazole was used as Cu ion sensing probe [28] , however low stability of the probe was an issue. A similar probe based on Rhodamine dye tagged quinaldinet was developed by Zhang et al. [29] . This probe was able to detect Cu ions within about 10 - 15 minutes; however a large amount of the dye (~5:1 dye to Cu ratio) was required for reliable measurements. Fluorescent proteins, red-emitting HcRed and green-emitting GFP, mutated to have Cu binding sites were shown to effectively recognize Cu ions in biological fluids [26] [27] . Upon binding to 100 µm Cu ions, almost 100% fluorescence quenching was observed. The drawback of this sensing strategy is associated with the stability of the proteins. HcRed was shown to perform better at low temperature [27] . Recently, a coumarin dye based fluorescence probe has been reported [30] that exhibits high selectivity towards Cu2+ ions. Fluorescence quenching is observed when Cu2+ ions bind to green-emitting (450 nm emission) coumarin dye derivative. The sensitivity of the detection was directly proportional to dye concentration. The probe works well in the pH range between 4 and 10 which is desired pH range for biological applications. When excess dye was used to boost the signal-to- noise ratio, self-quenching of the coumarin dye was observed dye to the formation of J-aggregation [30] .

In this paper, we would propose to design synthetic scheme of coumarin conjugated Graphene Oxide (GO) nanomaterial. This design will take advantage of the high selectivity of the coumarin derivative towards Cu2+ ions as reported in the literature [30] and minimize the self-quenching problem. This is a feasible strategy as the coumarin dye will be covalently attached to GO surface and this attachment will hinder the formation of J-aggregation of coumarin dye molecules. The use of GO to prevent such J-aggregation has been reported in the literature [31] [32] .

1.2. Graphene—A 2D Robust Substrate Having Enormously Large Surface Area

During the recent time Graphene, GO and nanomaterial research has gained a tremendous momentum because of their potential applications in material science [33] [34] . Graphene has a two-dimensional (one atom thick) crystals of SP2 bonded carbon atoms densely packed in a honey comb crystalline lattice. The C-C bond length of graphene is 0.142 nm and Graphene sheets are stuck to form graphite with inter planner spacing of 0.335 nm. It possesses some unique properties such as high surface area (2620 m2/g), high electronic conductivity (electron mobility 20,000 cm/second under unit potential gradient) low resistivity (specific resistance) 10−6 Oh-cm) high mechanical and chemical stability [35] .

Calculation based on ab initio shows that Graphene is thermodynamically unstable if it contains less than 6000 atoms (by Shenderovaab et al.) [36] . Graphene is a hydrophobic material and it has no binding sites available for ions. Graphene is chemically converted to GO (via oxidation)/GO derivatives for increasing its hydrophillicity by introducing suitable functional groups. GO can be dispersed in aqueous solution and they carry hydroxyls, acids and epoxy groups on the surface [37] . Functional groups on the GO surface can be further modified to attach suitable ligands [37] . In general, GO is considered as a biocompatible material. However, there are reports showing cytotoxic effect of GO to human fibroblast cells above 50 µg/mL concentration [38] .

2. Experimental Scheme

2.1. Synthetic Strategy

The basic idea is to attach GO, a high surface area substrate material to the Cu ion selective fluorescent dye (such as coumarin, scheme shown in Figure 1). For such attachment, Cu ion selective coumarin dye derivative (as reported in the literature [30] ; Figure 2) will be further modified to obtain a terminal primary amine group.

Figure 1. Pictorial representation of the scheme.

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the Cu2+ ion selective coumarin dye showing the active Cu2+ ion binding site.

The amine functionalized coumarin dye will be covalently attached to GO surface through epoxy ring opening reaction, forming the GOCD. Since the coumarin dye molecules are covalently attached to the GO substrate, it is anticipated that dye-dye interaction (J-aggregation) will be minimized. This is important for boosting the sensitivity for the Cu2+ ion detection in the nanomolar range. Moreover, the proposed GOCD is a new hybrid material. It would be interesting to explore the photophysical properties of the GOCD.

2.2. Schematic Representation of Overall Synthetic Strategy

Figure 3. The proposed synthesis scheme of GOCD (compound #8).

2.3. Synthesis of Graphene-Oxide Coumarin Conjugate (GOCD)

The proposed GOCD will involve a multi-step synthesis process.

Step 1 is the preparation of the GO from graphite flakes following Hummar [39] method. This method uses chemical and sonication techniques to exfoliate GO from purified natural graphite. The resulting exfoliated GO form colloidal suspension of individual GO sheet in water. Then following the procedure of Wang et al. [40] , pH assisted selective sedimentation will be done to separate GO of different size range.

Step 2 is the synthesis of primary amine functionalized Cu2+ ion selective coumarin dye (compound #4, see Figure 3). An amine containing precursor, methyl 4-amino-2-hydroxybenzoate (compound #1, Sigma-Aldrich; catalogue #PH001949) will be reacted with the protected az-ir-idine to make compound #2. This addition reaction involves nucleophilic ring opening of az-ir-idine by the NH2 group of the compound #1 under mild acidic reaction condition to control reaction rate. Compound #3 (a cyclic ester) will be then prepared by treating the compound #2 with acetonitrile in presence of SmI2 catalyst. Using LiAlH4, selective reduction reaction will be carried out to convert the compound #3 to the corresponding aldehyde (compound #4). Similar synthetic route has been reported in the literature where Diethylamino-2-hydroxy-benzaldehyde was used as the precursor starting material [30] instead of compound #1 and therefore this proposed synthesis step is feasible.

Step 3 is the GO conjugation with the compound #4 (Figure 3), forming compound #5. The GO which is produced via Hammer method is intrinsically acidic and it has surface epoxy groups. It is expected that the compound #4 will readily react with the epoxy containing GO when combined together. The terminal amine group of the compound #4 will take part in the epoxy ring opening reaction. Similar epoxy ring opening reactions involving primary amine containing molecules and the GO have been reported in the literature [37] [41] [42] .

Step 4 is a simple acid catalyzed Michael type addition reaction between the dimethyl malonate and the compound #5, forming the compound #6. Then the compound #6 will be converted to the compound #7 in acidic condition where GO is expected to serve as a catalyst. This proposed synthesis step is based on a recent research reported by the Bielawski group [43] . Their findings confirmed that GO served as a catalyst in auto tandem oxidation-aldol condensation reaction [43] . Similar catalytic/carbocatalyst [44] activity is expected in the proposed condensation and hydride elimination step.

Step 5 is the final step where the compound #7 will be converted to the compound #8 (the proposed GOCD). In this step, 2-aminomethyl pyridine addition and condensation reaction catalyzed by GO will be carried out in acidic reaction condition.

3. Conclusion

Synthetic steps proposed for synthesis of GOCD are conventional and uses of GO as catalyst are also well reported. Fluorescence of coumarin in GO-coumarin derivative (GOCD) will quench upon binding with Cu ions similar to its quenching of coumarin derivative as studied previously. Presence of GO in GOCD will not affect the strong fluorescence emission of coumarin derivative as GO is reported to exhibit a weak fluorescence property and it is covalently boded to CD. GOCD should exhibit two distinct absorption bands characteristic to GO (200 - 450 nm absorption) and the coumarin dye (430 nm). Based on the literature reports, it is evident that the absorption band position of GO largely depends a number of factors including particle size, pH and the degree of oxidation [45] [46] . GO usually emits in the range 400 - 700 nm [46] -[48] . Depending on the pH, GO particle size [45] and extent of GO oxidation, emission of GO could vary anywhere between the 370 - 650 nm [45] [46] . Since GO is water soluble, GOCD will also be water dispersible and minimize dye-dye aggregation. Thus, GOCD will be an ideal fluorescence sensor for estimation of nanomolar concentration of cupric ion in aqueous solutions and biological organs.

Acknowledgements

SBM is thankful to Dr. Swadeshmukul Santra of NSTC, UCF for his valuable suggestions and guidance.

References

  1. Richardson, H.W. (1997) Handbook of Copper Compounds and Applications. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1-432.
  2. Eisler, R. (1998) Copper Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review. Geological Survey, Washington DC.
  3. Forstner, U. and Wittmann, G.T.W. (1979) Metalpollution in the Aquatic Environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96511-1_1
  4. Bowen, H.J.M. and Hutzinger, D. (1985) The Natural Environment and the Biogeochemical Cycles. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39209-5_1
  5. Multhaup, G. (1997) Amyloid Precursor Protein, Copper and Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomedicine Pharmacotherapy, 51, 105-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0753-3322(97)86907-7
  6. Donnelly, P.S., Xiao, Z.G. and Wedd, A.G. (2007) Copper and Alzheimer’s Disease. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 11, 128-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.678
  7. Harris, Z.L. and Gitlin, J.D. (1996) Genetic and Molecular Basis for Copper Toxicity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 63, 836-841.
  8. Cordeiro, C.R.B., Marques, A.L.B., Marques, E.P., Cardoso, W.S. and Zhang, J. (2006) Ultra Trace Copper Determination by Catalytic-Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry Using an Alizarin Red S Modified Graphite Electrode. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 1, 343-353.
  9. Mulazimoglu, I.E. (2012) Electrochemical Determination of Copper(II) Ions at Naringenin-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode: Application in Lake Water Sample. Desalination and Water Treatment, 44, 161-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.691692
  10. Minami, T., Sohrin, Y. and Ueda, J. (2005) Determination of Chromium, Copper and Lead in River Water by Graphite- Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry after Coprecipitation with Terbium Hydroxide. Analytical Sciences, 21, 1519-1521. http://dx.doi.org/10.2116/analsci.21.1519
  11. Kalis, E.J.J., Weng, L., Dousma, F., Temminghoff, E.J.M. and Van Riemsdijk, W.H. (2006) Measuring Free Metal Ion Concentrations in Situ in Natural Waters Using the Donnan Membrane Technique. Environmental Science Technology, 40, 955-961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es051435v
  12. Shao, N., Zhang, Y., Cheung, S.M., Yang, R.H., Chan, W.H., Mo, T., et al. (2005) Copper Ion-Selective Fluorescent Sensor Based on the Inner Filter Effect Using a Spiropyran Derivative. Analytical Chemistry, 77, 7294-7303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac051010r
  13. Sirilaksanapong, S., Sukwattanasinitt, M. and Rashatasakhon, P. (2012) 1,3,5-Triphenylbenzene Fluorophore as a Selective Cu2+ Sensor in Aqueous Media. Chemical Communications, 48, 293-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1cc16148b
  14. Dong, Y., Koken, B., Ma, X., Wang, L., Cheng, Y. and Zhu, C. (2011) Polymer-Based Fluorescent Sensor Incorporating 2,2’-Bipyridyl and Benzo[2,1,3]Thiadiazole Moieties for Cu2+ Detection. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 14, 1719-1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2011.07.014
  15. Frigoli, M., Ouadahi, K. and Larpent, C. (2009) A Cascade FRET-Mediated Ratiometric Sensor for Cu2+ Ions Based on Dual Fluorescent Ligand-Coated Polymer Nanoparticles. Chemistry—A European Journal, 15, 8319-8330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200900475
  16. Helal, A., Rashid, M.H.O., Choi, C.H. and Kim, H.S. (2011) Chromogenic and Fluorogenic Sensing of Cu2+ Based on Coumarin. Tetrahedron, 67, 2794-2802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2011.01.093
  17. Zhou, Y., Wang, F., Kim, Y., Kim, S.J. and Yoon, J. (2009) Cu2+-Selective Ratiometric and “Off-On” Sensor Based on the Rhodamine Derivative Bearing Pyrene Group. Organic Letters, 11, 4442-4445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol901804n
  18. Zhao, X.H., Ma, Q.J., Zhang, X.B., Huang, B., Jiang, Q. and Zhang, J. (2010) A Highly Selective Fluorescent Sensor for Cu2+ Based on a Covalently Immobilized Naphthalimide Derivative. Analytical Sciences, 26, 585-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.2116/analsci.26.585
  19. Yin, S., Leen, V., Van, S.S., Boens, N. and Dehaen, W. (2010) A Highly Sensitive, Selective, Colorimetric and Near- Infrared Fluorescent Turn-On Chemosensor for Cu2+ Based on BODIPY. Chemical Communications, 46, 6329-6331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0cc01772h
  20. Wang, W.D., Fu, A., You, J.S., Gao, G., Lan, J.B. and Chen, L.J. (2010) Squaraine-Based Colorimetric and Fluorescent Sensors for Cu2+-Specific Detection and Fluorescence Imaging in Living Cells. Tetrahedron, 66, 3695-3701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2010.03.070
  21. Li, G.K., Xu, Z.X., Chen, C.F. and Huang, Z.T. (2008) A Highly Efficient and Selective Turn-On Fluorescent Sensor for Cu2+ Ion Based on Calix 4 Arene Bearing Four Iminoquinoline Subunits on the Upper Rim. Chemical Communications, 2008, 1774-1776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b800258d
  22. Jiao, L., Li, J., Zhang, S., Wei, C., Hao, E. and Vicente, M.G.H. (2009) A Selective Fluorescent Sensor for Imaging Cu2+ in Living Cells. New Journal of Chemistry, 33, 1888-1893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b906441a
  23. Shamsipur, M., Poursaberi, T., Avanes, A. and Sharghi, H. (2006) Copper(II)-Selective Fluorimetric Bulk Optode Membrane Based on a 1-Hydroxy-9,10-Anthraquinone Derivative Having Two Propenyl Arms as a Neutral Fluorogenic Ionophore. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 63, 9-14.
  24. White, B.R. and Holcombe, J.A. (2007) Fluorescent Peptide Sensor for the Selective Detection of Cu2+. Talanta, 71, 2015-2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2006.09.009
  25. Mei, Y.J., Bentley, P.A. and Wang, W. (2006) A Selective and Sensitive Chemosensor for Cu2+ Based on 8-Hydroxy- quinoline. Tetrahedron Letters, 47, 2447-2449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.01.091
  26. Ayyadurai, N., Prabhu, N.S., Deepankumar, K., Lee, S.G., Jeong, H.H., Lee, C.S. and Yun, H. (2011) Development of a Selective, Sensitive, and Reversible Biosensor by the Genetic Incorporation of a Metal-Binding Site into Green Fluorescent Protein. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 50, 6534-6537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201008289
  27. Rahimi, Y., Shrestha, S., Banerjee, T. and Deo, S.K. (2007) Copper Sensing Based on the Far-Red Fluorescent Protein, HcRed, from Heteractis crispa. Analytical Biochemistry, 370, 60-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2007.05.018
  28. Huang, L., Chen, F., Xi, P., Xie, G., Li, Z., Shi, Y., et al. (2011) A Turn-On Fluorescent Chemosensor for Cu2+ in Aqueous Media and Its Application to Bioimaging. Dyes and Pigments, 90, 265-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.01.003
  29. Zhang, J., Yu, C., Qian, S., Lu, G. and Chen, J. (2012) A Selective Fluorescent Chemosensor with 1,2,4-Triazole as Subunit for Cu(II) and Its Application in Imaging Cu(II) in Living Cells. Dyes and Pigments, 92, 1370-1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.09.020
  30. Jung, H.S., Kwon, P.S., Lee, J.W., Kim, J.I., Hong, C.S., Kim, J.W., et al. (2009) Coumarin-Derived Cu2+-Selective Fluorescence Sensor: Synthesis, Mechanisms, and Applications in Living Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 131, 2008-2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja808611d
  31. Xu, Y., Malkovskiy, A. and Pang, Y. (2011) A Graphene Binding-Promoted Fluorescence Enhancement for Bovine Serum Albumin Recognition. Chemical Communications, 47, 6662-6664.
  32. Yavari, F., Chen, Z., Thomas, A.V., Ren, W., Cheng, H.M. and Koratkar, N. (2011) High Sensitivity Gas Detection Using a Macroscopic Three-Dimensional Graphene Foam Network. Scientific Reports, Article No. 166.
  33. Ahmadipour, M., Rao, K.V. and Rajandar, V. (2012) Formation of Nanoscale Mg(x)Fe(1−x)O (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.4) Structure by Solution Combustion: Effect of Fuel to Oxidizer Ratio. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2012, Article ID: 163909. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/anp.2012.13006
  34. Ahmadipour, M., Hatami, M. and Rao, K.V. (2012) Preparation and Characterization of Nano-Sized (Mg(x)Fe(1−x)O/ SiO2) (x = 0.1) Core-Shell Nanoparticles by Chemical Precipitation Method. Advance in Nanoparticles, 1, 37-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/163909
  35. Zhu, Y., Murali, S., Cai, W., Li, X., Suk, J.W., Potts, J.R. and Ruoff, R.S. (2010) Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Advanced Materials, 22, 3906-3924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201001068
  36. Shenderovaab, O.A., Zhirnovac, V.V. and Brennera, D.W. (2002) Carbon Nanostructures. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, 27, 227-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408430208500497
  37. Dreyer, D.R., Park, S., Bielawski, C.W. and Ruoff, R.S. (2010) The Chemistry of Graphene Oxide. Chemical Society Reviews, 39, 228-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b917103g
  38. Wang, K., Ruan, J., Song, H., Zhang, J., Wo, Y. and Guo, S. (2011) Biocompatibility of Graphene Oxide. Nanoscale Research Letters, 6, 1-8.
  39. Hummers, W.S. and Offeman, R.E. (1958) Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 80, 1339-1339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a017
  40. Wang, X., Bai, H. and Shi, G. (2011) Size Fractionation of Graphene Oxide Sheets by pH-Assisted Selective Sedimen- tation. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 133, 6338-6342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja200218y
  41. Wang, S., Lin, H.E., Lin, H.D., Chen, K.Y., Tu, K.H., Chen, C.W., et al. (2008) Transport Behavior and Negative Magnetoresistance in Chemically Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanofilms. Nanotechnology, 22, Article ID: 335701.
  42. Wang, S., Chia, P.J., Chua, L.L., Zhao, L.H., Png, R.Q., Sivaramakrishnan, S., et al. (2008) Band-Like Transport in Surface-Functionalized Highly Solution-Processable Graphene Nanosheets. Advanced Materials, 20, 3440-3446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800279
  43. Jia, H.P., Dreyer, D.R. and Bielawski, C.W. (2011) Graphite Oxide as an Auto-Tandem Oxidation-Hydration-Aldol Coupling Catalyst. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, 353, 528-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201000748
  44. Daniel, R.D., Hong, P.J. and Christopher, W.B. (2010) Graphene Oxide: A Convenient Carbocatalyst for Facilitating Oxidation and Hydration Reactions. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 49, 6813-6816.
  45. Galande, C., Mohite, A.D., Naumov, A.V., Gao, W., Ci, L., Ajayan, A., et al. (2011) Quasi-Molecular Fluorescence from Graphene Oxide. Scientific Reports, 1, Article No. 85.
  46. Eda, G., Lin, Y.Y., Mattevi, C., Yamaguchi, H., Chen, H.A., Chen, I.S., et al. (2010) Blue Photoluminescence from Chemically Derived Graphene Oxide. Advanced Materials, 22, 505-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200901996
  47. Sun, X., Liu, Z., Welsher, K., Robinson, J.T., Goodwin, A., Zaric, S., et al. (2008) Nano-Graphene Oxide for Cellular Imaging and Drug Delivery. Nano Research, 1, 203-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8
  48. Luo, Z., Vora, P.M., Mele, E.J., Johnson, A.T.C. and Kikkawa, J.M. (2009) Photoluminescence and Band Gap Modulation in Graphene Oxide. Applied Physics Letters, 94, Article ID: 111909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3098358